skip to main content

Participatory Flood Risk Mapping Using the Geographic Information System (DIG-GIS) Integration in Beru-Beru Village, Mamuju Regency

Department of Urban Planning, Universitas Sulawesi Barat, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright 2025 Journal of Architectural Design and Urbanism under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Recurring floods in Beru-Beru Village, West Sulawesi, devastate 200 hectares annually, resulting in economic losses of Rp 2 billion. This study presents a participatory approach that combines Geographic Information Systems (GIS) with Disaster Imagination Games (DIG) to transform community-based flood risk assessment. Utilizing structured stakeholder engagement with 40 people, we employed the risk formula R = (H × V × (1-C))¹/² on 1,401.2 hectares, uncovering significant regional variation. 15.4% of high-risk areas are centered in the Kampung Baru and Kampung Rea hamlets, whilst 30.1% of the region exhibited very low adaptive capacity. The incorporation of DIG-GIS facilitated unparalleled community engagement, converting passive risk recipients into proactive risk evaluators, hence allowing for real-time verification of technical studies through the amalgamation of local expertise. This methodology, in contrast to traditional top-down approaches, attained 89% stakeholder consensus in risk prioritization and enhanced hazard awareness by 340% relative to the first survey. This framework's primary novelty is the democratization of scientific risk assessment, coupled with technical rigor, resulting in spatially explicit risk maps that are comprehensible and trusted by the community. Research findings demonstrate that participatory GIS, when integrated with serious games, can effectively connect expert knowledge with community perceptions, fundamentally shifting catastrophe planning from a reactive to a proactive framework. This methodological advancement provides a quantifiable option for flood-prone developing areas where community endorsement is crucial for the efficacy of interventions.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: participatory GIS, Disaster Imagination Game (DIG), community-based flood risk assessment, flood risk mapping, stakeholder involvement

Article Metrics:

  1. Aronsson-Storrier, M. (2021). Kantor PBB untuk Pengurangan Risiko Bencana (2019). Buku Tahunan Internasional Bencana Hukum Online, 2(1), 377–382. https://doi.org/10.1163/26662531_00201_016
  2. Aulady, M. F. N., & Fujimi, T. (2019). Earthquake loss estimation of residential buildings in Bantul regency, Indonesia. Jàmbá Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v11i1.756
  3. Ayuningtyas, E. A., Hizbaron, D. R., & Kanthi, N. S. (2017). Integrasi Kearifan Lokal Berbasis SIG untuk Pemetaan Partisipatif Jalur Evakuasi Bencana Tsunami di Desa Srigading, Bantul
  4. Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana (BNPB). (2022). Indeks Rawan Bencana Indonesia (IRBI) Tahun 2022
  5. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Kabupaten Mamuju. (2024). Statistik Daerah Kabupaten Mamuju 2024
  6. Daimon, H., Miyamae, R., & Wang, W. (2023). Menavigasi Teori-teori Tindakan dalam Pencegahan Bencana: Tinjauan Sistematis tentang Penelitian Bencana di Jepang. Bahaya Alam
  7. Hartono, D., Khoirudin Apriyadi, R., Winugroho, T., Aprilyanto, A., Hadi Sumantri, S., Wilopo, W., & Surya Islami, H. (2021). Analisis Sejarah, Dampak, Dan Penanggulangan Bencana Gempa Bumi Pada Saat Pandemi Covid-19 Di Sulawesi Barat. PENDIPA Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 5(2), 218-224. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.2.218-224. Teknologi Informasi di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Geosains Indonesia, 10 (2), 201214.
  8. Imansyah, F. (2021). Spatial Decision Support Systems untuk Aplikasi Pengelolaan Database Penduduk Miskin Perkotaan. Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi (Justin), 9(4), 398. https://doi.org/10.26418/justin.v9i4.46773
  9. Irfan, M., Soma, A. S., & Barkey, R. A. (2021). Analysis of flood vulnerability in the lawo watershed Soppeng Regency. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 886(1), 012091. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/886/1/012091
  10. Jena, R., & Pradhan, B. (2020). Earthquake Social Vulnerability Assessment Using Entropy Method. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 540(1), 012079. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/540/1/012079
  11. Lanya, I., Netera Subadiyasa, N., Sardiana, K., Ratna Adi, G. P., & Gunasih, M. T. (2019). Remote sensing and GIS applications for sustainable food agricultural land mapping and supporting the preparation of regional spatial plans (case study of Badung Regency). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 284(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/284/1/012001
  12. Lessy, M. R., Wahiddin, N., & Nagu, N. (2018). Flood Risk Assessment and Its Vulnerability in Coastal Villages, Central Halmahera District – North Maluku. Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2018). Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2018), Bali, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/icst-18.2018.79
  13. Mah, J. C., Penwarden, J. L., Pott, H., Theou, O., & Andrew, M. K. (2023). Social vulnerability indices: A scoping review. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 1253. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16097-6
  14. Mahful, R., Algifari, A., Jacobus, J., & Haqiq, A. (2020). EPIC (Education Priority Compact) Strategy as A Solution for Education of Post-Disaster Refugee Children in Palu City, Central Sulawesi. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 875(1), 012086. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/875/1/012086
  15. Mahful, R., Lestari, S. A. P., Maharani, A. P., Sintia, W. S., Deril, V. E. Y., Pratam, F., & Djohan, I. (t.t.). Integration of Disaster Imagination Game and Geographic Information System Methods in Mapping Earthquake Disaster Risk in Botteng Village, Mamuju Regency
  16. Morales, G., & Reyes Gallardo, M. (2023, Juni 25). Mempromosikan Kesadaran Risiko Tsunami melalui Pembelajaran Layanan dan Penerapan Permainan Imajinasi Bencana (DIG) dalam Teknik Kelautan: Analisis Persepsi Mahasiswa Beberapa Tahun Kemudian. Prosiding Konferensi & Eksposisi Tahunan ASEE 2023. 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--43989
  17. Naryanto, H. S. (2021). Analisis Risiko Bencana Gempa Bumi di Kabupaten Serang. Jurnal ALAMI : Jurnal Teknologi Reduksi Risiko Bencana, 4(2), 114-123. https://doi.org/10.29122/alami.v4i2.4541
  18. Prasetyo, B. E., Idfi, G., Mujiyono, & Suwarno, E. (2019). Application of steady flow model to overcome inundation based on eco drainage system in the Port Area of Dobo City, Aru Islands Regency. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 669(1), 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/669/1/012028
  19. Purwanto, H., Suhari, K. T., Tjahjadi, M. E., & Setyawan, D. A. (2022). 3D Topography Modeling from Integrating Bathymetric and Aerial Imagery for Sermo Reservoir Monitoring. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1051(1), 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1051/1/012008
  20. Raduszynski, T., & Numada, M. (2023). Measure and spatial identification of social vulnerability, exposure and risk to natural hazards in Japan using open data. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 664. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27831-w
  21. Ramlah, R., Indrastuti, I., Haerani, H., & Mahful, R. (2023). Pemanfaatan Diversifikasi Pangan Sehat Jewawut Sebagai Peluang Usaha Masyarakat Desa Lego Polewali-Mandar. 2(2)
  22. Reyes, M., & Miura, F. (2017). KINERJA DAN EVALUASI PERMAINAN IMAJINASI BENCANA (DIG) DI CHILE
  23. Robiul Awaliah, M. A., & Marsisno, W. (2024). Pemanfaatan Hasil Data Digital Elevation Model untuk Estimasi Produksi Pertambangan Pasir dan Batu. Seminar Nasional Official Statistika, 2024(1), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.34123/semnasoffstat.v2024i1.2093 Review,24(2).
  24. Saiman, S., Hijri, Y. S., & Hadi, K. (2022). Pendampingan dan Pelatihan Peningkatan Kapasitas Desa Tangguh Bencana Sebagai Upaya Pengurangan Risiko Bencana (PRB) Berbasis Masyarakat Di Desa Gajahrejo Kecamatan Gedangan Kabupaten Malang. Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.55824/jpm.v1i2.79
  25. Seniarwan, S., Baskoro, D. P. T., & Gandasasmita, K. (2013). ANALISIS SPASIAL RISIKO BANJIR WILAYAH SUNGAI MANGOTTONG DI KABUPATEN SINJAI, SULAWESI SELATAN. Jurnal Ilmu Tanah dan Lingkungan, 15(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.29244/jitl.15.1.39-44
  26. Sipayung, W. Y., Maryani, E., Somantri, L., & Setiawan, I. (2023). ANALISIS TINGKAT KERENTANAN BENCANA (STUDI KASUS: KAWASAN CAGAR BUDAYA CANDI MUARA JAMBI)
  27. Ujianti, RMD, Novita, M., & Muflihati, I. (2023). Strategi mitigasi bencana berbasis teknologi informasi di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Geosains Indonesia , 10 (2), 201-214
  28. Wibowo, Y. A., Marfai, M. A., Hadi, M. P., Fatchurohman, H., Ronggowulan, L., & Arif, D. A. (2022). Geospatial technology for flood hazard analysis in Comal Watershed, Central Java, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1039(1), 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1039/1/012027
  29. Widiastutik, R., & Bukhori, I. (2018). KAJIAN RISIKO BENCANA LONGSOR KECAMATAN LOANO KABUPATEN PURWOREJO. JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN WILAYAH & KOTA, 14(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v14i2.19258
  30. Wiguna, S., & Gao, J. (2019). MODELLING OF POPULATION EXPOSURE TO LANDSLIDE RISK IN SUKABUMI, INDONESIA USING GIS. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-3/W8, 461–468. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W8-461-2019
  31. Ynaotou, Jayadi, R., Rahardjo, A. P., & Puspitosari, D. A. (2021). Identification of Flood-prone Areas using HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS, the Case of Ciberang River Basin, Lebak District of Banten Province. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 930(1), 012082. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/930/1/012082

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.