DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jadu.v6i2.21705

Characteristics of Public Open Space Area in the Kampung Settlement (Case Study: Kampung Cungkeng)

Architecture Study Program, Faculty of Infrastructure and Regional Technology, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright 2024 Journal of Architectural Design and Urbanism under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study investigates the characteristics of public space areas in kampung settlement, Kampung Cungkeng, Teluk Betung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia. The study aims to identify the public space utilization and the elements moulding open space in this urban kampung. This study is to identify the characteristics of public space, the social interaction of communities and the dynamic interplay between public space and activities. It identifies the utilization of public open space which communities or dwellers use to interact and socialize in some activities in Kampung Cungkeng. The research is framed by qualitative method descriptively through collecting data and observing areas is accomplished by a snapshot surveying in a certain time. The method of data analysis is constructed by technical quality analysis based on facts and perception. The findings are the shortage of public space availability influences dwellers’ interaction and they bond engagement in semi-public zones, such as terraces and yards, where dwellers share the private house area to facilitate social activities. The lack of public space availability makes folks reorganise the existing public space and complete the additional facilities, features, or infrastructure to facilitate better social interaction and enhance comfort in Kampung Cungkeng. 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: public space, social interaction, kampung, settlement

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Spatial Configuration & Management Street Vendors in Public Space House Privacy in Densely Populated Settlements Extraction Process of Precedent Study in the Student Studio Scheme More recent articles
  1. Alexander, Christopher, Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A Pattern Language; Towns, Building, Construction. Oxford University Press
  2. Asriana, N. (2021). Pedestrian Behavior for Developing Strategy in Tourism Area; Agent-Based Simulation. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 48(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.48.1.65-74
  3. Asriana, N., & Indraprastha, A. (2016). Making sense of agent-based simulation: Developing design strategy for pedestrian-centric urban space. CAADRIA 2016, 21st International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia - Living Systems and Micro-Utopias: Towards Continuous Designing, 343–352
  4. Carmona, M., Magalhaes, C. de, & Hammond, L. (2008). Public Space. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927229
  5. Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1993). Public Space. Cambridge University Press
  6. Darmawan, S., & Utami, T. B. (2018). POLA PEMANFAATAN RUANG TERBUKA PADA PEMUKIMAN KAMPUNG KOTA. Vitruvian
  7. Funo, S., Yamamoto, N., & Silas J. (2002). Typology of Kampung Houses and Their Transformation Process a A Study on Urban Tissues of Indonesian City. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering , 1(2), 193–200
  8. Gehl, J. (2006). Life between Buildings; Using Public Space (Sixth). The Danish Architectural Press
  9. Hakim, R. (1987). Unsur Dalam Perancangan Arsitektur Lanskap. Balai Pustaka
  10. Hantono, D. (2019). KAJIAN PERILAKU PADA RUANG TERBUKA PUBLIK. NALARs, 18(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.24853/nalars.18.1.45-56
  11. Hickman, P. (2013). “Third places” and social interaction in deprived neighbourhoods in Great Britain. Journal If Housing and the Built Environment, 28(2), 221–236
  12. Krier, R. (1979). Urban Space. Academy Group
  13. Mehta, V. (2013). The Street. Routledge
  14. Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418
  15. Nurhijrah, N., & Wikantaria, R. (2019). Manfaat Ruang Terbuka dan Hubungannya dengan Kegiatan Interaksi Sosial Studi Kasus: Perumahan Nusa Tamalanrea Indah Makassar. JURNAL ARSITEKTUR, 9(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.36448/jaubl.v9i2.1261
  16. Purnamasari, W., Rudinanda, O., & Wijaya, I. N. (2019). TIPOLOGI DAN KUALITAS PENGGUNAAN RUANG PUBLIK PERMUKIMAN KAMPUNG KOTA MALANG. Tata Kota Dan Daerah, 11(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.takoda.2019.011.01.5
  17. Setiawan, B., Oblo, D., & Djati, R. (2010). Kampung Kota dan Kota Kampung Potret: Tujuh Kampung Kota di Jogja (Urban Kampung and Kampung Urban: Portrait of Seven Urban Kampungs in Jogja)
  18. Setyowati, S. (n.d.). PERAN RUANG TERBUKA SEBAGAI RUANG SOSIALISASI ANAK DALAM MEMBENTUK KARAKTER BANGSA
  19. Shirvani, H. (1985). The Urban Design Process. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company
  20. Siahaan, J. (2010). Ruang Publik: Antara Harapan dan Kenyataan. Buletin Tata Ruang, 11–16

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.