DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jadu.v5i2.17118

Systematic Literature Review of Housing Policies in Carbon Emission Reduction: Reflection for Indonesia

Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright 2023 Journal of Architectural Design and Urbanism under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

How to cite (BCREC): Buton, A. H., Yuli, N. G., Maharika, I. F. (2023). Systematic Literature Review of Housing Policies in Carbon Emission Reduction: Reflection for Indonesia. Journal of Architectural Design and Urbanism, 5 (2), 61-71 (doi:10.14710/jadu.v5i2.17118)
Citation Format:
Abstract
Housing cannot be separated from the discourse of carbon emissions in all building cycles: planning and design, material preparation, construction, operations, and demolition. Various countries have successfully reduced carbon emissions in the housing sector, one of which is by using policy instruments. However, reviewing the effectiveness of these policies has yet to be thoroughly explored. Using the systematic literature review method, this article aims to identify the policies implemented to reduce carbon emissions in housing and contextualize them for Indonesia. After careful identification of the relevant articles, 16 selected articles were reviewed. The study found that taxation, zero-carbonization, and strategies for retrofitting are adequate policies in many countries. Framework for Indonesia was discussed for recommendations.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Cover Letter
Cover Letter and Complete Manuscript
Subject
Type Cover Letter
  Download (572KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Carbon Emission; Zero-Emission, Housing Sector

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Material-Based Learning in Architecture Design Studio: From ‘Beaux-Arts’ to ‘Bauhaus’ into Current Educational Era Toward Utilizing IoT Open Data Set to Identify the Room Thermal Comfort Cultural Acculturation Study of Visual Form of Facades and Spatial Organization of Glodok’s Shophouses, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia More recent articles
  1. Bobrova, Y., Papachristos, G., & Chiu, L. F. (2021). Homeowner low carbon retrofits: Implications for future UK policy. Energy Policy, 155(July 2020), 112344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112344
  2. Dubois, G., Sovacool, B., Aall, C., Nilsson, M., Barbier, C., Herrmann, A.,
  3. Bruyère, S., Andersson, C., Skold, B., Nadaud, F., Dorner, F., Moberg, K. R., Ceron, J. P., Fischer, H., Amelung, D., Baltruszewicz, M., Fischer, J., Benevise, F., Louis, V. R., & Sauerborn, R. (2019). It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures. Energy Research and Social Science, 52(March), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.001
  4. Edmondson, D. L., Rogge, K. S., & Kern, F. (2020). Zero carbon homes in the UK? Analysing the co-evolution of policy mix and socio-technical system. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35(April), 135–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.02.005
  5. European Standard EN 15978:2011. Sustainability of construction works. Assessment of environmental performance of buildings. Calculation method
  6. Fan, Y., Zhao, X., Li, J., Li, G., Myers, S., Cheng, Y., Badiei, A., Yu, M., Golizadeh Akhlaghi, Y., Shittu, S., & Ma, X. (2020). Economic and environmental analysis of a novel rural house heating and cooling system using a solar-assisted vapour injection heat pump. Applied Energy, 275(February), 115323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115323
  7. Faure, C., Guetlein, M. C., Schleich, J., Tu, G., Whitmarsh, L., & Whittle, C. (2022). Household acceptability of energy efficiency policies in the European Union: Policy characteristics trade-offs and the role of trust in government and environmental identity. Ecological Economics, 192(October 2021), 107267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107267
  8. Forde, J., Osmani, M., & Morton, C. (2021). An investigation into zero-carbon planning policy for new-build housing. Energy Policy, 159(September), 112656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112656
  9. Giordano R, Gallina F, Quaglio B. (2021) Analysis and Assessment of the Building Life Cycle. Indicators and Tools for the Early Design Stage. Sustainability 13(11):6467. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116467
  10. Hardani, Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Sukmana, D. J., & Istiqomah, R. R. (2017). Buku Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif (H. Abadi (ed.); Issue April). Pustaka Ilmu
  11. Hasanbeigi, A., Lu, H., Williams, C., & Price, L. (2012). International Best Practices for Pre- Processing and Co-Processing Municipal Solid Waste and Sewage Sludge in the Cement Industry (Issue July)
  12. Heffernan, E., Pan, W., Liang, X., & de Wilde, P. (2015). Zero carbon homes: Perceptions from the UK construction industry. Energy Policy, 79(2015), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.005
  13. Jiang, Y., Long, Y., Liu, Q., Dowaki, K., & Ihara, T. (2020). Carbon emission quantification and decarbonization policy exploration for the household sector - Evidence from 51 Japanese cities. Energy Policy, 140(March), 111438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111438
  14. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat (10 January 2023) Citing Internet sources URL https://pu.go.id/berita/dukung-kebijakan-pengurangan-emisi-karbon-kementerian-pupr-bangun-50-ribu-unit-rumah-berkonsep-green-building
  15. Keskin, F. S., Martinez-Vazquez, P., & Baniotopoulos, C. (2020). An overview of sustainability policies and strategies on buildings in Turkey. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 39(9), 843–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2020.1768094
  16. Kurdi, S. Z. (2008). Pengaruh Emisi co2 dari Sektor Perumahan Perkotaan Terhadap Kualitas Lingkungan Global. Jurnal Permukiman, 3(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.31815/jp.2008.3.137-150
  17. Kusminingrum, N. (2018). Efektifitas Reduksi Polusi Udara Dengan Metode Vertical Garden (the Effectiveness of Air Pollution Reduction With Vertical Garden Method). Jurnal Jalan-Jembatan, 33(2), 102–114. http://jurnal.pusjatan.pu.go.id/index.php/jurnaljalanjembatan/article/view/59
  18. Lane, M., van der Horst, D., Tingey, M., Smith, C., & Webb, J. (2020). Social innovation in the shadow of policy failure: Energy efficiency in self-build housing. Global Transitions, 2, 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2020.08.001
  19. Li, H. X., Moore, T., Huang, J., Zhang, P., & Costin, G. (2022). Towards zero carbon housing in Victoria, Australia: A policy and incentive framework. Energy Strategy Reviews, 40, 100802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100802
  20. Lolo, L. D. F. A., Maulana, A. D., & Pasaribu, D. N. (2022). Transparansi Pajak Karbon: Digitalisasi Pajak Karbon Sebagai Katalisator Dalam Pembangunan Rendah Karbon di Indonesia. Jurist-Diction, 5(1), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v5i1.32981
  21. Malafry, L., & Brinca, P. (2022). Climate policy in an unequal world: Assessing the cost of risk on vulnerable households. Ecological Economics, 194(January), 107309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107309
  22. Moz-Christofoletti, M. A., & Pereda, P. C. (2021). Distributional welfare and emission effects of energy tax policies in Brazil. Energy Economics, 104(June 2019), 105616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105616
  23. O’Neill, K., & Gibbs, D. (2020). Sustainability transitions and policy dismantling: Zero carbon housing in the UK. Geoforum, 108(January 2019), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.11.011
  24. Ott, L., & Weber, S. (2022). How effective is carbon taxation on residential heating demand? A household-level analysis. Energy Policy, 160, 112698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112698
  25. Pacheco-Torres, R., Jadraque, E., Roldán-Fontana, J., & Ordóñez, J. (2014). Analysis of CO2 emissions in the construction phase of single-family detached houses. Sustainable Cities and Society, 12(November 2019), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.01.003
  26. Patrianti, T., & Shabana, A. (2020). GAS RUMAH KACA UNTUK MENGATASI PERUBAHAN IKLIM GOVERNMENT RISK COMMUNICATION ON GREENHOUSE GAS. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Opini Publik Vol., 24(2), 156–170
  27. Sassi, P. (2006). Strategies for Sustainable Architecture. Taylor & Francis
  28. Shang, M., & Geng, H. (2021). A study on carbon emission calculation of residential buildings based on whole life cycle evaluation. E3S Web of Conferences, 261. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126104013
  29. Shigetomi, Y., Kanemoto, K., Yamamoto, Y., & Kondo, Y. (2021). Quantifying the carbon footprint reduction potential of lifestyle choices in Japan. Environmental Research Letters, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abfc07
  30. Sutartib, M., & Purwana, A. S. (2021). TANTANGAN ADMINISTRASI PENGENAAN PAJAK KARBON DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Anggaran Dan Keuangan Negara Indonesia, 3(2)
  31. The World Bank (10 January 2023) Citing Internet sources URL https://data.worldbank.org/country/indonesia?view=chart
  32. Trotta, G. (2018). The determinants of energy efficient retrofit investments in the English residential sector. Energy Policy, 120(April), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.024
  33. Utami, T. K., & Puriningsih, F. S. (2014). Penghitungan Kadar Emisi Gas Buang Di Pelabuhan Belawan. Warta Penelitian Perhubungan, 26(5), 285. https://doi.org/10.25104/warlit.v26i5.891
  34. Vidyattama, Y., Tanton, R., & Nakanishi, H. (2021). Investigating Australian households’ vehicle ownership and its relationship with emission tax policy options. Transport Policy, 114(February), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.09.017
  35. Xiao, Yu & Watson, Maria (2017). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 39(1) 93–112 https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
  36. Zhang, S., Wang, K., Xu, W., Iyer-Raniga, U., Athienitis, A., Ge, H., Cho, D. woo, Feng, W., Okumiya, M., Yoon, G., Mazria, E., & Lyu, Y. (2021). Policy recommendations for the zero energy building promotion towards carbon neutral in Asia-Pacific Region. Energy Policy, 159(July), 112661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112661

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.