DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijpd.4.2.57-68

Developing a Dynamic Model for Sustainable Development in Yogyakarta City

*Didi Nuryadin  -  Policy Studies, Postgraduate School, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia
Samsubar Saleh  -  Faculty of Economics and Business, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia
Amirullah Setya Hardi  -  Faculty of Economics and Business, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia
Evita Hanie Pangaribowo  -  Faculty of Geography, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia
Received: 26 Feb 2019; Published: 31 Oct 2019.
Editor(s): Surjono Surjono
Open Access Copyright (c) 2019 The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Developments in Yogyakarta City have driven residents of the city and its outskirts to access available social facilities, such as education, healthcare, and employment. If this continues, various social and urban problems may emerge, including increased population density and traffic congestion. Another implication of this process is decreased environmental carrying capacity as a result of continued use of non-sustainable approaches to development. This study aims to model the complexity of the relationships between aspects i.e., social, economic, and environmental of the area studied. The system dynamics method is used, as it is a disciplinary approach that is able to fully explore problems that occur in interconnected systems rather than examining incidents partially. As the basis for this model, the causal loop diagram (CLD) model has been applied based on literature studies and field observations. The result shows that developments in the tourism and education sectors are the main factors affecting the intersections of social, economic, and environmental considerations.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: education; sustainable development; system dynamics; tourism

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Renewable Energy Cost Estimation on Smart On Grid Actuator Innovation for the Development of Alternative Rural Electricity Public Green Space Availability in Semarapura Urban Area Public Spending and Poverty Reduction in Indonesia: The Effects of Economic Growth and Public Spending on Poverty Reduction in Indonesia 2009-2018 More recent articles
  1. Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., … Pimentel, D. (1995). Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Ecological Applications, 15(2), 91–95. doi: 10.2307/2269541
  2. Asriningtyas, V., & Putra, D. P. E. (2006). Ten year groundwater simulation in Merapi aquifer, Sleman, DIY, Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Geography, 38(1), 1–14. doi: 10.22146/ijg.2232
  3. Atmasari, N. (2014). Air di Jogja: Setiap tahun turun 30 centimeter, ini penyebabnya. Retrieved from https://jogjapolitan.harianjogja.com/read/2014/09/15/510/536326/air-di-jogja-setiap-tahun-turun-30-centimeter-ini-penyebabnya
  4. Badan Lingkungan Hidup Yogyakarta. (2014). Laporan hasil pemantauan kualitas sir sungai tahun 2014. Yogyakarta
  5. Bappeda DI Yogyakarta. (2016). Seri analisis pembangunan wilayah provinsi di Yogyakarta, Tahun 2016. Yogyakarta: Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (Bappeda) DI Yogyakarta
  6. Bappeda Kota Yogyakarta. (2016). Seri analisis PDRB Kota Yogyakarta, tahun 2016. Yogyakarta
  7. Basiago, A. D. (1998). Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. The Environmentalist, 19(2), 145–161. doi: 10.1023/A:1006697118620
  8. Bassi, A. M. (2009). Analyzing the role of integrated, dynamic, national development planning models to support policy formulation and evaluation. In The 3rd OECD World Forum on “Statistics, Knowledge and Policy”, Charting Progress, Building Visions, Improving Life. Busan, Korea: OECD World Forum. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/site/progresskorea/44120838.pdf
  9. Bassi, A. M. (2010). Evaluating the use of an integrated approach to support energy and climate policy formulation and evaluation. Energies, 3(9), 1604–1621. doi: 10.3390/en3091604
  10. Beckerman, W. (1992). Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? whose environment? World Development, 20(4), 481–496. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(92)90038-W
  11. Bossel, H. (1998). Earth at a crossroads: Paths to a sustainable future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  12. Bossel, H. (1999). Indicators for sustainable development: Theory, method, applications. Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
  13. Boulding, K. (1966). The economics of the coming spaceship earth. In Environmental quality in a growing economy, resources for the future (pp. 3–14). Baltimore
  14. BPS Kota Yogyakarta. (2015). Kota Yogyakarta dalam angka tahun 2015. Yogyakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Yogyakarta
  15. Cavana, R. Y., & Ford, A. (2004). Environmental and resource systems: Editors’ introduction. System Dynamics Review, 20(2), 1–11. doi: 10.1002/sdr.293
  16. Cerin, P. (2006). Bringing economic opportunity into line with environmental influence: A discussion on the Coase theorem and the Porter and van der Linde hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 56(2), 209–225. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.016
  17. Chen, M.-C., Ho, T.-P., & Jan, C.-G. (2006). A system dynamics model of sustainable urban development: Assessing air purification policies at Taipei City. Asian Pacific Planning Review, 4(1), 29–52. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-System-Dynamics-Model-of-Sustainable-Urban-Air-at-Chen-Ho/fd35538a23ba41d390b2356adcc01415355f80c4#citing-papers
  18. Dernbach, J. C. (1998). Sustainable development as a framework for national governance. Case W. Res. L. Rev., 49(1)
  19. Dernbach, J. C. (2003). Achieving sustainable development: The centrality and multiple facets of integrated decisionmaking. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 10(1), 247–284. doi: 10.2979/gls.2003.10.1.247
  20. Dietz, T., & Stern, P. C. (1998). Science, values, and biodiversity. BioScience, 48(6), 441–444. doi: 10.2307/1313241
  21. Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kota Yogyakarta. (2015). Status Lingkungan Hidup Daerah (SLHD) Kota Yogyakarta tahun 2015. Yogyakarta
  22. Dorner, D. (2003). The mathematics of emotions. In F. Detje, D. Dörner, & H. Schaub (Eds.), Fifth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 75–79). Bamberg: Universität Bamberg. Retrieved from https://fis.uni-bamberg.de/handle/uniba/9236
  23. Duran-Encalada, J. A., & Paucar-Caceres, A. (2009). System dynamics urban sustainability model for Puerto Aura in Puebla, Mexico. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 22(2), 77–99. doi: 10.1007/s11213-008-9114-8
  24. Economides, G., & Philippopoulos, A. (2008). Growth enhancing policy is the means to sustain the environment. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(1), 207–219. doi: 10.1016/j.red.2007.05.001
  25. Ehrenfeld, J. R. (2005). The roots of sustainability. WINTER, 46(2), 23–25. Retrieved from http://sloanreview.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/saleable-pdfs/46207.pdf
  26. Elkington, J., & Rowlands, I. H. (1999). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Alternatives Journal, 25(4), 42–43. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/openview/804cc9d98196ef6e26d88748e89f8db0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=35934
  27. Ewers, H., & Nijkamp, P. (1990). Sustainability of urban system. Gower Publishing Ltd. Aldershot
  28. Forrester, J. W. (1971). World Dynamics. Cambridge, Mass., Wright-Allen Press. Cambridge, Mass., Wright-Allen Press
  29. Friends of the Earth. (1994). Planning for the planet: Sustainable development policies for local and strategic plans. London: Friends of the Earth
  30. Goldin, C., & Lawrence F. Katz. (2009). The Race between education and technology. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of harvard University Press
  31. Gregory, R. (2000). Using stakeholder values to make smarter environmental decisions. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 42(5), 34–44. doi: 10.1080/00139150009604888
  32. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. doi: 10.2307/2118443
  33. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1996). The inverted-U: what does it mean? Environment and Development Economics, 1(1), 119–122. doi: 10.1017/S1355770X00000450
  34. Hadi, M. P., & Sa’duddin. (2015). Beban emisi sektor transportasi di Kota Yogyakarta. In The 18th FSTPT International Symposium (p. 10). Lampung: Universitas Lampung. Retrieved from http://eng.unila.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/RT073.pdf
  35. Hale, E. O. (1993). Successful public involvement. Journal of Environmental Health, 55(4), 17–19. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/44535851
  36. Harris, J. M. (2009). Basic principles of sustainable development. In K. S. Bawa & R. Seidler (Eds.), Dimensions of sustainable development - Volume I (pp. 21–40). Oxford: Eolss Publisher Co. Ltd
  37. Ho, Y., & Wang, S. (2005). System dynamics model for the sustainable development of science city. In The 23rd International Conference of System Dynamics Society, Sloan School of Management, MIT, USA. Taipei: Chungkuo Inslitute of Technolog. Retrieved from http://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/2005/proceed/papers/HO240.pdf
  38. Holmberg, J. (1992). Making development sustainable: Redefining institutions policy and economics. Washington, D.C.: Island Press
  39. Jaba, E., Balan, C. B., & Robu, I.-B. (2014). The relationship between life expectancy at birth and health expenditures estimated by a cross-country and time-series analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15(14), 108–114. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00454-7
  40. Jackson, Michael C. (1999). Towards coherent pluralism in management science. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(1), 12–22. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600661
  41. Jackson, Mike C. (1997). Pluralism in systems thinking and practice. In Multimethodology: the theory and practice of combining management science methodologies (pp. 347–378). John Wiley
  42. Kamath, G. B., Kamath, V., & Rodrigues, L. L. R. (2014). The dynamics of social and ecosystem for the sustainable development of mankind: a system dynamics perspective. International Journal of Renewable Energy and Environmental Engineering, 2(1), 53–57. Retrieved from http://eprints.manipal.edu/id/eprint/143353
  43. Keating, M. (1993). The earth summit’s agenda for change : A plain language version of agenda 21 and the other rio agreements. Centre for Our Common Future
  44. Khan, M. A. (1995). Sustainable development: The key concepts, issues and implications. Sustainable Development, 3(2), 63–69. doi: 10.1002/sd.3460030203
  45. Lektauers, A. (2015). System dynamics framework for sustainable development analysis of local governments. Eastern European Business and Economics Journal, 1(2), 85–101. Retrieved from http://eebej.eu/2015v1n2/85-101.pdf
  46. Manzi, T., Lucas, K., Lloyd-Jones, T., & Allen, J. (2010). Understanding social sustainability: key concepts and developments in theory and practice. In Social sustainability in urban areas: communities, connectivity, and the urban fabric (pp. 19–52). London: Earthscan
  47. Markandya, A. (1998). Poverty, income distribution and policy making. Environmental and Resource Economics, 11, 459–472. doi: 10.1023/A:1008209712672
  48. Meadows, D. H. (1999). Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system. Sustainability Institute Hartland, VT. Retrieved from http://www.donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/
  49. Millennium Institute. (2005). Threshold 21 (T21) Overview. Arlington, VA, USA: Millenium Institute a sustainable future for earth is possible
  50. Millennium Institute. (2007). Technical Documentation for the Threshold21 Starting Framework model (Version of). Millenium Institute a sustainable foture for earth is possible
  51. Mingers, J, & Brocklesby, J. (1996). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for critical pluralism. Systemist, 18(3), 101–132
  52. Mingers, John. (1997a). Multi-paradigm multimethodology. In Mingers John & A. Gill (Eds.), Multimethodology: Theory and practice of combining management science methodologies (pp. 1–20). Chichester: University of Kent. Retrieved from https://kar.kent.ac.uk/3805/1/Multi-paradigm Multimethodology.pdf
  53. Mingers, John. (1997b). Towards critical pluralism. In John Mingers & A. Gill (Eds.), Multimethodology: towards theory and practice for mixing and matching methodologies (pp. 407–440). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons
  54. Muibi, S. O., & Sinbo, O. O. (2013). Macroeconomic determinants of tax revenue in Nigeria (1970-2011). World Applied Sciences Journal, 28(1), 27–35. doi: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.28.01.1189
  55. Rahayu, S. (2009). Kajian konversi lahan pertanian di daerah pinggiran Kota Yogyakarta bagian Selatan (Studi kasus di sebagian daerah Kecamatan Umbulharjo). Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota, 5(3), 365-365. Retrieved from http://eprints.undip.ac.id/27432/
  56. Ratnasari, A., Sitorus, S. R., & Tjahjono., B. (2015). Perencanaan kota hijau Yogyakarta berdasarkan penggunaan lahan dan kecukupan RTH. Tata Loka, 17(4), 196–208. doi: 10.14710/tataloka.17.4.196-208
  57. Riddell, W. C., & Song, X. (2011). The impact of education on unemployment incidence and re-employment success: Evidence from the U.S. labour market. Labour Economics, 18(4), 453–463. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2011.01.003
  58. Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48(4), 369–384. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.017
  59. Rotmans, J. (1998). Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 3, 155–179. doi: 10.1023/A:1019019024003
  60. Roy, S., Byrne, J., & Pickering, C. (2012). A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(4), 351–363. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.006
  61. Saeed, K. (1998). Sustainable trade relations in a global economy. System Dynamics Review, 14(2), 107–128. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1727(199822/23)14:2/3<107::aid-sdr145>3.0.co;2-h
  62. Schellnhuber, H.-J., & Wenzel, V. (2012). Earth system analysis: Integrating science for sustainability. (H.-J. Schellnhuber & V. Wenzel, Eds.). Postdam: Springer Science & Business Media
  63. Selden, T. M., & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(2), 147–162. doi: 10.1006/jeem.1994.1031
  64. Shafik, N., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic growth and environmental quality: Time-series and cross-country evidence. World Bank Publications
  65. Sluijs, J. P. (1997). Anchoring amid uncertainty: On the management of uncertainties in risk assessment of anthropogenic climate change. Utrecht University, Utrecht
  66. Springael, J., Kunsch, P. L., & Brans, J.-P. (2002). A multicriteria-based system dynamics modelling of traffic congestion caused by urban commuters
  67. Central European Journal of Operational Research, 10(1), 81–97. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/download/48582530/A_multicriteria-based_system_dynamics_mo20160905-24547-10fbltj.pdf
  68. Stave, K. A. (2002). Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions. System Dynamics Review: The Journal of the System Dynamics Society, 18(2), 139–167. doi: 10.1002/sdr.237
  69. Sterman, J. D. (1994). Learning in and about complex systems. System Dynamics Review, 10(2–3), 291–330. doi: 10.1002/sdr.4260100214
  70. Sterman, J. D. (2002). All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist. System Dynamics Review, 18(4), 501–531. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.261
  71. Sterman, J. D., & Sweeney, L. B. (2002). Cloudy skies: assessing public understanding of global warming. System Dynamics Review, 18(2), 207–240. doi: 10.1002/sdr.242
  72. Stoddart, H. (1992). A pocket guide to sustainable development governance. In United Nations conference on the human environment - Rio declaration on environment and development. Rio de Janiero, Brazil: United Nations
  73. Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. D. (2000). Bathtub dynamics: initial results of a systems thinking inventory. System Dynamics Review, 16(4), 249–286. doi: 10.1002/sdr.198
  74. The World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development : Our common future acronyms and note on terminology chairman ’ s foreword. Oslo. Retrieved from https://naaee.org/sites/default/files/our-common-future.pdf
  75. Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. (2009). Economic development 10th edition. Addison Wesley. Boston: Addison Wesley
  76. UN Habitat. (2010). Planning sustainable cities: UN-Habitat practices and perspectives. UN Habitat. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN-HABITAT)
  77. United Nations General Assembly. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. United Nations General Assembly, Development and International Cooperation: Environment (Vol. 10). Oslo, Norway
  78. Wahyuni, S. (2009). Analisis sektor-sektor ekonomi unggulan di provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (periode 2003 – 2007). Institut Pertanian Bogor
  79. Wiranatha, A. S., & Smith, P. N. (2000). A conceptual framework for a dynamic model for regional planning: Towards sustainable development for Bali, Indonesia. In 1st International Conference on System Thinking in Management. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f77e/3026725ef635fa4f921b3fbaeb2c52f02bad.pdf
  80. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press
  81. Zgurovsky, M. Z. (2009). Global analysis of sustainable development in context of quality and security of human life. System Research and Information Technologies, 1, 7–21. Retrieved from http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/12400

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.