DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijpd.10.2.66-75

Growth Center Identification and Accessibility-Based Spatial Interaction in Bondowoso Regency

*Indah Ludiana Putri  -  Major of Rural and Regional Development Planning Science, Faculty of Economics and Management, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia, Indonesia
Bambang Juanda  -  Department of Economics and Management, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia., Indonesia
Mangasa Augustinus Sipahutar  -  Department of Management, Faculty of Business, Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kesatuan, Bogor 16123, Indonesia, Indonesia
Received: 20 Feb 2025; Accepted: 11 Dec 2025; Available online: 16 Dec 2025; Published: 16 Dec 2025.
Editor(s): Surjono Surjono

Citation Format:
Abstract

Bondowoso Regency, as a developing rural and semi-urban area, faces dynamic development challenges, particularly inter-district development disparities and uneven concentrations of economic activity. This inequality reflects a disparity between districts in terms of facilities, accessibility, and the distribution of economic activity centers. The determination of growth centers is a crucial strategy for identifying areas with the potential to be drivers of development. This study aimed to determine the growth center and the accessibility-based spatial interaction in Bondowoso Regency, East Java, Indonesia. The methods used for this study were scalogram, gravity, and overlay analysis. The results showed that Bondowoso District has 561 facility units with a regional development index value of 69.86 (Hierarchy I). This indicates its role as a growth center that can influence the strength of spatial interactions between districts in Bondowoso Regency. The highest spatial interaction value was found in Tenggarang District at 39,708, while the lowest was in Sukosari District at 3,980. The optimization of these central places is expected to create a polarization effect and increase the attractiveness of the surrounding areas. This can be a consideration for the Bondowoso Regency government in determining the direction of development to reduce inter-regional inequality.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Accessibility Index; Bondowoso Regency; Growth Center.

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
  1. Ardeasari, F. (2021). Analisis Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan Di Kecamatan Ceper Kabupaten Klaten Tahun 2010 Dan 2020 [Skripsi]. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  2. Brueckner, M., & Lederman, D. (2018). Inequality and economic growth: The role of initial income. Journal of Economic Growth, 23(3), 341–366
  3. Dhali, M. K., Chakraborty, M., & Sahana, M. (2019). Assessing spatio-temporal growth of urban sub-centre using Shannon’s entropy model and principle component analysis: A case from North 24 Parganas, lower Ganga River Basin, India. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 22(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2018.02.002
  4. Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140
  5. Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2), 73–76
  6. Hariayanto, A. (2017). Studi Pengembangan Ekonomi Lokal Terkait Interaksi Desa-Kota. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.29313/jpwk.v14i1.2552
  7. He, J., Li, C., Yu, Y., Liu, Y., & Huang, J. (2017). Measuring urban spatial interaction in Wuhan Urban Agglomeration, Central China: A spatially explicit approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 32, 569–583
  8. Iyer, K. C., & Thomas, N. (2020). A Critical Review on Regional Connectivity Scheme of India. Transportation Research Procedia, 48, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.005
  9. Lakshmanan, T. R. (2011). The broader economic consequences of transport infrastructure investments. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(1), 1–12
  10. Laksono, H., Rustiadi, E., & Siregar, H. (2018). Spillover Spasial Negatif Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Antar Kabupaten/Kota Di Provinsi Jawa Timur. TATALOKA, 20(3), 266. https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.20.3.266-277
  11. Lee, C. (1973). Models in Planning (1st ed., Vol. 4). Pergamon Press
  12. Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Pan, X., & Ma, X. (2020). The spatial integration and coordinated industrial development of urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Cities, 104
  13. Liu, Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, J. (2019). Spatial accessibility and regional development: A case study of rural China. Sustainability, 11(12), 3431
  14. Mansury, Y., & Shin, J. K. (2015). Size, connectivity, and tipping in spatial networks: Theory and empirics. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54, 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.08.004
  15. Mastika, I. K., Harsono, S. S., Khristianto, W., Oktawirani, P., & Hutama, P. S. (2023). Creative strategies of local resources in managing geotourism in the Ijen Geopark Bondowoso, East Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11(1), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.01.002
  16. Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: Gerald Duckworth
  17. Nusantara, D. P., Kusuma, C. S., Anugrah, A. S., Pertiwi, C. M., Nursyifa, N., & Zahratunnisa, Z. (2024). Konsep Struktur Citra Kota pada Sistem Pusat Pelayanan Kecamatan Kaliori sebagai Solusi Kemacetan Juwana-Rembang. Jurnal Litbang: Media Informasi Penelitian, Pengembangan dan IPTEK, 20(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.33658/jl.v20i1.376
  18. Panuju, D. R., & Rustiadi, E. (2013). Teknik analisis perencanaan pengembangan wilayah
  19. Perroux, F. (1955). Note sur la notion de pole de croissance. Économie Appliquée, 8, 307–320
  20. Putra, N. A., Badjuri, B., & Anifatul, H. (2017). Penentuan Pusat Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Dalam Pengembangan Wilayah Di Eks. Karesidenan Besuki. e-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 4(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejeba.v4i1.4603
  21. Qibti, M. H. M., & Hendarto, R. M. (2020). Analisis Spillover Effect Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Antar Kabupaten/Kota di Kawasan Purwomanggung Jawa Tengah Tahun 1988-2018. 9
  22. Rachmawatie, D. (2024). Regional Development and The Direction for Regional Development: Empirical Study in Bogor Regency (Sectoral and Spatial Approaches). Journal of Environmental Economics and Sustainability, 1(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.47134/jees.v1i3.226
  23. Ristanto, D. A. (2024). Penentuan Hierarki Pusat Pertumbuhan pada Kawasan Selingkar Ijen Melalui Pendekatan Density Based Spatial Interaction Model [Thesis]. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  24. Rossi, U. (2020). Growth Poles and Growth Centers. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 6(2), 281–285
  25. Rustiadi, E., & Panuju, D. R. (2011). Teknik Analisis Perencanaan Pengembangan Wilayah. Bagian Perencanaan Pengembangan Wilayah IPB
  26. Safira, L., Samudro, B. R., & Mulyanto. (2023). Determination of the Center for Economic Growth in Surakarta City, Indonesia: Geospatial Approach. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(9), 2801–2810. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180918
  27. Sari, G. N., & Wahed, M. (2023). Analisis Spillover Effect Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Kabupaten/Kota Di Wilayah Bakorwil V Jember Jawa Timur Menggunakan Analisis VECM. JEMSI (Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi), 9(4), 1265–1275. https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v9i4.1283
  28. Suryana, S. K., Rahayu, P., & Rini, E. F. (2021). Kesenjangan Aksesibilitas Utara Dan Selatan Kota Surakarta. Desa-Kota, 3(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.20961/desa-kota.v3i2.44748.133-147
  29. Taufiqqurrachman, F. (2024). Kajian Indeks Skalogram, Indeks Sentralitas Marshall dan Indeks Gravitasi Pada Penentuan Pusat-Pusat Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Jawa Timur. Journal of social science research, 4(1), 5952–5963
  30. Tobler, W. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240
  31. Umage, I., Titaley, S., & Matitaputty, I. T. (2024). Perkembangan Pusat Pertumbuhan Kota Sanana Terhadap Wilayah Hinterland. Equilibrium: Journal of Economics and Development Studies, 1(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.30598/Equilibrium.1.2.98-108
  32. Vidriza, U. (2024). Interaksi dan Keterkaitan Spasial Wilayah di Kabupaten Penajam Paser Utara. Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 6(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.24036/jkep.v6i1.15841
  33. Wontiana, W., & Sunarto, S. (2018). Kesenjangan Fasilitas Publik antar Kabupaten/Kota Dan Kaitannya dengan Pusat Pertumbuhan. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 5(3), 337–344. https://doi.org/10.15294/edaj.v5i3.22159
  34. Yusliana, Y., Devi, M. K. D., & Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Institut Teknologi Nasional Yogyakarta. (2020). Interaksi Wilayah Pusat Pertumbuhan Melalui Pendekatan Skalogram dan Gravitasi di Wilayah Pesisir Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Geodika: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu dan Pendidikan Geografi, 4(2), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.29408/geodika.v4i2.2721

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.