DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijpd.7.1.33-40

Implementation of Smart City Development Policy in Gedebage, Bandung, Indonesia

*Dimas Darmawansyah  -  Dinas Penataan Ruang Kota Bandung, Indonesia
Wisnu Pradoto scopus  -  Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Received: 30 Dec 2021; Published: 28 Feb 2022.
Editor(s): Rukuh Setiadi, Ph.D

Citation Format:
Abstract

The smart city concept aims to help the people by enhancing information to the community or institutions to carry out activities or anticipate unexpected events to manage resources more efficiently ultimately. Within the smart city field, the Technopolis sub-concept aims for developing a safe and comfortable city life technology supported by accessible, fast, smooth, and productive city management. This project is expected to provide main activities of trade and services, creative and high technology industries, tourism, and transportation. The case study of Gedebage district was chosen because of its power as a fast-growing economic potential by optimizing existing potential, both in the form of physical possibility, resources, and cooperation between the government and the private sector. This type of research is field research, which uses the object of research regarding a symptom or event in community groups. Therefore, this research can also be a case study with a descriptive-quantitative approach. Quantitative analysis shows an actual sign, can be studied epistemologically, and the research that will be carried out aims to find explanations between indicators.  Based on the findings of the analysis and research, it has been determined that the implementation of Bandung city government policies has a significant effect on community participation in planning the Gedebage Sub-region as the new city center of Bandung through the concept of technopolis.

 

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: implementation; policy; smart city development

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
  1. Abubakar, I.R. and Doan, P.L., 2017. Building new capital cities in Africa: Lessons for new satellite towns in developing countries. African Studies, 76(4), pp.546-565
  2. Ajikusumah, D. 2017. Kajian tentang Pembangunan Teknopolis dalam Perspektif Keberlanjutan Warga Pinggiran Kota (Studi Kasus: Warga Kampung Rancabayawak Gedebage Kota Bandung). Tesis Program Studi Magister Studi Pembangunan Institut Teknologi Bandung. Bandung
  3. Akoth Oloo and H. Bulla Orwar, (2016): Influence of participatory decision making of junior staff at Uchumi retail supermarkets in Kenya
  4. Angelidou, M., 2014. Smart city policies: A spatial approach. Cities, 41, pp.S3-S11
  5. Anttiroiko, A., 2004. Global competition of high-tech centres international. Journal of Technology Management, 28(3/4), p.5
  6. Appio, F.P., Lima, M. and Paroutis, S., 2019. Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, pp.1-14
  7. Biswas, R.R., 2004. Making a technopolis in Hyderabad, India: The role of government IT policy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(8), pp.823-835
  8. Chase, Richard B., F. Robert Jacobs, dan Nicholas J. Aquilano. (2004). Operation Management for Competitive Advantage. Singapore: McGraw Hill
  9. Chen, H., 2014. Support Mechanism in technopolis toward green growth. In Technopolis (pp. 117-129). Springer, London
  10. Chen, Yu Shan. 2014. The Driver of Green Innovation and Green Image- Green Core Competence.Journal of Business Ethics. Volume 81 Tahun 2014. Pg 531-543
  11. Conyers, D. 1994. Perencanaan Sosial di Dunia Ketiga. Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta
  12. Dabinett, G., 2014. A New Strategic Approach to Science Cities: Towards the Achievement of Sustainable and Balanced Spatial Development. In Technopolis (pp. 3-21). Springer, London
  13. Dunn, William N. 2000. Pengantar Analisa Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada Press
  14. Edwards III George. 1980. Implementing Public Policy. Washington, D.C. Robert L. Peabody
  15. Filipić, P. (2016). Economic Effects of the Capital City. Split University's Economics Faculty. University of Split
  16. Harold D. Laswell, Abraham Kaplan. 1970. Power and Society, New Haven: Yale University Press
  17. Hilman, M., 2004. Perkembangan lokasi perumahan di wilayah gedebage kota bandung akibat pemekaran kota. DIMENSI: Journal of Architecture and Built Environment, 32(2)
  18. Illmann, E., 2015. Reasons for relocating capital cities and their implications
  19. Kustiwan, I. and Ladimananda, A., 2016. Pemodelan Dinamika Perkembangan Perkotaan dan Daya Dukung Lahan di Kawasan Cekungan Bandung. Tataloka, 14(2), pp.98-112
  20. Kyaw, A., 2001. Technopolis and regional development in Japan: A statistical analysis
  21. Lee, E.H. and Oh, D.S., 2016. Endogenous Development Strategy of Technopolis in Korea: Case of Daedeok INNOPOLIS. World Technopolis Review, 5(1), pp.2-18
  22. Monzon, A., 2015, May. Smart cities concept and challenges: Bases for the assessment of smart city projects. In 2015 international conference on smart cities and green ICT systems (SMARTGREENS) (pp. 1-11). IEEE
  23. Nam, T. and Pardo, T.A., 2011, September. Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance (pp. 185-194)
  24. Oh, D.S., 2014. Business incubation strategy of high-tech venture firms in a science park. In Technopolis (pp. 145-167). Springer, London
  25. Phillips, F., 2014. Toward a sustainable technopolis. In Technopolis (pp. 169-183). Springer, London
  26. Potts, D., 1985. Capital relocation in Africa: The case of Lilongwe in Malawi. Geographical Journal, pp.182-196
  27. Smilor, R.W., Gibson, D.V. and Kozmetsky, G., 1989. Creating the technopolis: High-technology development in Austin, Texas. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(1), pp.49-67
  28. Su, K., Li, J. and Fu, H., 2011, September. Smart city and the applications. In 2011 international conference on electronics, communications and control (ICECC) (pp. 1028-1031). IEEE
  29. Sutriadi, R., 2016. A Communicative City as a Preliminary Step towards a Technopolis Agenda. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, pp.623-629

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.