Copyright as an Object of Banking Guarantee (Comparative Study of Indonesia and Singapore)

Salsabillah Suci Rahmadani  -  Faculty Of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
*Desy Rizky Mahrunnisa  -  Faculty Of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Aliffia Intan Maharani  -  Faculty Of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Immanuela Yvette Aveyory  -  Faculty Of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2023 Diponegoro Private Law Review

How to cite (IEEE): S. S. Rahmadani, D. R. Mahrunnisa, A. I. Maharani, and I. Y. Aveyory, "Copyright as an Object of Banking Guarantee (Comparative Study of Indonesia and Singapore)," Diponegoro Private Law Review, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 34-46, Dec. 2023. [Online]. Retrieved from :
Citation Format:
Abstract

Copyright as an object of guarantee is stated in the 2014 UUHC No. 28 article 16 paragraph (3) that copyright can be used as an object of fiduciary guarantee. In practice, no bank has issued a regulation related to this. Through research with a statutory approach and comparing it with Singapore, the author finds that there are several gaps, where Singapore already has clear rules, specialized banks, valuation agencies and IP market agencies. Meanwhile, Indonesia is still constrained by the unpreparedness of banking institutions.

Keywords: copyright, warranty, singapore, intellectual property rights.


Fulltext View|Download
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Legal Uncertainty In Fiduciary Guarantee Law: An Analysis Of Reality And Its Impact On Creditors Copyright as an Object of Banking Guarantee (Comparative Study of Indonesia and Singapore) Bentuk Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah Dalam Permasalahan Kreditur Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Jika Pengajuan Pailit Ditolak Oleh Pengadilan Niaga More recent articles
  1. Arifin, Z. (2020). Perlindungan Hak Cipta dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional. Jurnal Hukum Res Publica, 7(2), 93–100
  2. Atsar, A. (2018). Mengenal Lebih Dekat Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Deepublish
  3. Banerjee, D. S., Banerjee Chatterjee, T., & Raychaudhuri, A. (2008). Optimal enforcement and anti-copying strategies to counter copyright infringement. Japanese Economic Review, 59(4), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5876.2008.00424.x
  4. Cadavid, J. A. P. (2014). Copyright Challenges of Legal Deposit and Web Archiving in the National Library of Singapore. Alexandria: The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues, 25(1–2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.7227/alx.0017
  5. Cheng, S. L. (2003). Is there a Defence of Public Interest in the Law of Copyright in Singapore? Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 519–556
  6. Direktoral Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. (2007). Buku Panduan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. DKI Jakarta: Direktoral Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual
  7. Ernst & Young. (2016). Australian Intellectual Property Financing Market Review Ref No: C2015/12414
  8. Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia. UU Hak Cipta. http://www.setneg.go.id/index.php?option=com_perundangan&task=detail&id=404271&catid=1&tahun=2014&catname=UU
  9. Kurnianingrum, T. P. (2017). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Kredit Perbankan (Intellectual Property As Banking Credit Guarantee). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan, 8(1), 31-54
  10. Law UI. Hak Cipta Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia Terhambat Sistem Valuasi. https://law.ui.ac.id/hak-cipta-sebagai-jaminan-fidusia-terhambat-sistem-valuasi/
  11. Marditia, P. P. R. (2023). Regulation Model for Intellectual Property Financing Scheme (IPFS) Optimizing MSME Capital for the Tourism Sector Comparative Study: Singapore and Malaysia. In the 3rd International Conference on Business Law and Local Wisdom in Tourism (ICBLT 2022). Atlantis Press, 710–728
  12. Mustafa, Murni, Aneka Penegakan Hukum Hak Cipta, Paten, Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis (Bandung: Penerbit Alumni, 2022)
  13. Nurani, N. C. C., & Budiman, I. (2020). Copyright as a Guarantee of Fidusia in The Efforts to Accelerate Indonesia’s Creative Economic Growth. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(5), 691–704
  14. Prabandani, H. Studi Perbandingan Mengenai Pengaturan Perlindungan Hukum Hak Kekayaan (HKI) Di Internet (Suatu Tinjauan Sistem Hukum Indonesia, Amerika Dan Wipo Copyright Treaty 1996). Universitas Sebelas Maret
  15. Pasal 2 UU No. 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan
  16. Sembiring, S. (2002). Hak kekayaan intelektual dalam berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan. Yrama Widya
  17. Simatupang, T. H. (2021). Choosing a Copyright Assessment Method in Evaluating a Fiduciary Guarantee Object in Indonesia. In 1st International Conference on Law and Human Rights 2020 (ICLHR 2020). Atlantis Press, 314–322
  18. Suteki. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Rajawali Press
  19. Tsakalerou, M. (2018). Intellectual property as a key driver of business performance: the case of Singapore and its implications for innovation in a knowledge-based economy. Dalam Int. J. Learning and Intellectual Capital (Vol. 15, Nomor 1)
  20. Wawointana, R. (2013). Manfaat Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kredit Bank. Jurnal Lex Privatum, 1(3), 101–109

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.