skip to main content

BALANCING ACTS: UNVEILING SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSIONS OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY POLICIES IN INDONESIA

*Maddi - Maddi  -  Department of Foreign Languanges, Yangon University, Kamayot Township, Yangon I Yangon University, Myanmar

Citation Format:
Abstract

Rapid population increase, coupled with increasing urbanisation and industrialisation, is expected to create substantial demand for waste-to-energy (WtE) facilities in Indonesia. While the Indonesian government is working towards proper and economic handling of waste, there is a need to move beyond traditional incineration processes to more advanced WtE technologies in order to mitigate the adverse environmental impact. Along with this, a proper waste sorting system also needs to be established to improve the functioning of WtE facilities. However, challenges persist, including high capital costs, limited waste feedstock availability, and social acceptance concerns. Additionally, worries have been raised regarding the environmental and health impacts of WtE facilities, particularly their potential emissions of pollutants such as dioxins and furans. Overall, while WtE holds the potential to contribute to sustainable waste management and renewable energy development in Indonesia, careful planning and management are essential to ensure environmental, social, and economic sustainability. This study employs the Policy Effectiveness Assessment, guided by the Policy Implementation Theory, to evaluate WtE policies in Indonesia. By examining the intersection of environmental sustainability and socio-economic factors, the article aims to provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of current WtE policies. Through combining environmental, socio-economic, and technological perspectives, the article strives to offer a nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities, paving the way for informed policy decisions and sustainable waste management practices in the country.

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

  1. Afifa, L. (2024, February 10). Jakarta cleans up waste from 2024 election campaign equipment, some used for power plant fuel. Tempo. https://en.tempo.co/read/1832017/jakarta-cleans-up-waste-from-2024-election-campaign-equipment-some-used-for-power-plant-fuel
  2. AHK Indonesien. (2021). Indonesia's waste management sector is still going strong. https://indonesien.ahk.de/en/infocenter/news/news-details/indonesias-waste-management-sector-still-going-strong#:~:text=According%20to%20data%20from%20the,national%20waste%20management%20to%2049.18%25
  3. Asian Development Bank. (2019). ADB Annual Report 2018. ADB Annual Reports. https://doi.org/10.22617/fls190058
  4. Asian Development Bank. (2021). Indonesia Energy Sector Assessment, Strategy and Road Map Update. https://doi.org/10.22617/tcs200429
  5. BPS-Statistics Indonesia. (2023). Energy Balances of Indonesia 2018-2022. 25 (2)
  6. Bumimas Group. (2020). Bumimas Group Profile and Projects. cool hit counter. https://bumimasgroup.co.id/sejarah-singkat/
  7. Chakraborty, S. (2023, September 12). Dual advantage: Waste-to-energy deployment in Indonesia. Southeast Asia Infrastructure. https://southeastasiainfra.com/dual-advantage-waste-to-energy-deployment-in-indonesia/#:~:text=The%20WtE%20project%20will%20be,as%20fuel%20for%20power%20plants
  8. Darmawan , A. R., & Nathania, B. (2022, June 8). Indonesia should take a leadership role in the global plastics treaty (commentary). Mongabay Environmental News. Retrieved February 8, 2023, from https://news.mongabay.com/2022/06/indonesia-should-take-a-leadership-role-in-the-global-plastics-treaty-commentary/
  9. Data Insights. (2024, February 2). Power plant profile: Makassar waste to Energy Plant, Indonesia. Power Technology. https://www.power-technology.com/data-insights/power-plant-profile-makassar-waste-to-energy-plant-indonesia/
  10. Dryzek, J. S. (2009). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press
  11. Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge University Press
  12. Geels, F. W. 2002. “Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study.” Research Policy 31 (8/9):1257–74
  13. Jabar Bersih Lestari. (2023, November 13). PT.Jabar Bersih Lestari. https://www.pt-jbl.co.id/
  14. Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K., & Zito, A. (2005). The rise of ‘new’ policy instruments in comparative perspective: Has Governance Eclipsed Government? Political Studies, 53(3), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00540.x
  15. Kristyawan, I. P., Wiharja, Shoiful, A., Hendrayanto, P. A., & Santoso, A. D. (2021). Update on waste reduction performance by waste-to-energy incineration pilot plant PLTSA Bantargebang Operations. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 922(1), 012059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/922/1/012059
  16. Mariska, D. (2022, February 26). Tangerang’s waste-to-energy plant will process 2,000 tons of waste daily. theindonesia.id. https://www.theindonesia.id/news/2022/02/26/081500/tangerangs-waste-to-energy-plant-will-process-2000-tons-of-waste-daily
  17. Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2020). Indonesian Policy On Combating Plastic Pollution: Avoiding And Reducing Single-Use Plastic And Developing Circular Economy. Retrieved 11 March 2023, from https://ec.europa.eu/environment/international_issues/pdf/01-02%20-%20Novrizal%20Tahar.pdf
  18. Muthiariny, D. E. (2021, March 10). Bantargebang waste-to-energy plant produces 783.63 mwh of electricity. Tempo. https://en.tempo.co/read/1440779/bantargebang-waste-to-energy-plant-produces-783-63-mwh-of-electricity
  19. Rogers, E. M. (2005). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press
  20. Sabatier, P. A., & Mazmanian, D. A. (1981). A Model of the Implementation of Public Policy: The Case of Food and Energy Legislation. Policy Sciences, 14(2), 123-153
  21. Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (2005). The Implementation of Public Policy: A Framework of Analysis. Policy Studies Journal. 8. 538 - 560. 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1980.tb01266.x
  22. Templeton, G. (2021). Financing waste infrastructure in Indonesia. Green Investment Group. London
  23. The Jakarta Post. (2019). Residents angry over imported waste ending up in Bekasi - City. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2019/08/05/residents-angered-as-imported-waste-ends-up-in-bekasi-village.html
  24. The Jakarta Post. (2022). Jakpro to commence construction of waste-to-energy plant ITF sunter after years of delays - Jakarta. https://www.thejakartapost.com/indonesia/2022/09/23/jakpro-to-commence-construction-of-waste-to-energy-plant-itf-sunter-after-years-of-delays.html
  25. Walker, B., & Bullard, R. D. (1992). Dumping in dixie: Race, class, and Environmental Quality. Journal of Public Health Policy, 13(4), 522. https://doi.org/10.2307/3342543
  26. Wang, Y., Karasik, R., & Virdin, J. (2022). Indonesia. Indonesia | UNEP Law and Environment Assistance Platform. Retrieved on March 25, 2024, from https://leap.unep.org/countries/id/case-studies/indonesia
  27. Windi, Y. K., Wijayanti, D., Wiyatno, E. R., & Rahariyani, L. D. (2021). The significance of Super Depo Sutorejo: Waste management project in Surabaya Municipality, Indonesia. Kesmas: National Public Health Journal, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.21109/kesmas.v16i2.3808
  28. Yudhatama, R., Public Private Partnership: Infrastructure Projects Plan in Indonesia (2022)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.