DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dialogue.v5i1.17339

FACTORS INFLUENCING INTENTION TO USE E-GOVERNMENT SERVICES AMONG STUDENTS IN UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET, INDONESIA

Rahmad Agus Dwianto  -  Master of Government Affairs and Administration|Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
*Arief Bakhtiar Darmawan orcid  -  Department of International Relations|Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Indonesia
Joko Santoso  -  Department of Sociology|Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Indonesia
Ulung Pribadi  -  Department of Government Affairs and Administration|Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study aims to examine the factors that influence the intention of students to use e-government. The study used a survey method with 102 students as respondents from various study departments at Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia, in 2021. The analysis was carried out using the Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with the test R-square, path coefficients, outer loading, cross-loading, average variance extracted (AVE), Cronbach's alpha, and composite reliability. The results showed that students' desire to use or access e-government was positively and significantly influenced by students' trust in the government. Students trust to government is influenced by factors perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and security risk. The limitation of this research is that there is no analysis of the mediation test and moderation test.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: intention of student; e-government; trust; Universitas Sebelas Maret

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Kepemimpinan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Sektor Publik PERAN DEKRANASDA KOTA PROBOLINGGO DALAM PENGEMBANGAN UMKM/IKM BERBASIS INDUSTRI KREATIF LOKAL Kebijakan Adaptif Terhadap Penanganan Pandemi Covid-19 More recent articles
  1. Al-Jamal, M., & Abu-Shanab, E. (2015). Privacy Policy of E-Government Websites and the Effect on Users' Privacy. Conference: The 7th International Conference on Information Technology, 338–344. https://doi.org/10.15849/icit.2015.0066
  2. Almaiah, M.A. (2018). Acceptance and usage of a mobile information system services in University of Jordan. Education and Information Technologies, 23(10), 1–23
  3. Almaiah, M.A. and Al Mulhem, A. (2018b). A conceptual framework for determining the success factors of e-learning system implementation using Delphi technique. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(17), 1–37
  4. Al-Qeisi, K., Dennis, C., Alamanos, E. and Jayawardhena, C. (2014). Website design quality and usage behavior: unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 2282–2290
  5. Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2011). The Trouble with Transparency: A Critical Review of Openness in e-Government. Policy & Internet, 3(1), 158–187. https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1076
  6. Camilleri, MA (2019). Exploring the Behavioral Intention To Use E-Government Services: Validating the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. In Kommers, P. (Ed), 9th International Conference on Internet Technologies & Society, 27-34. Hong Kong: Lingnan University. https://doi.org/10.33965/its2019_201901l004
  7. Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation, and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
  8. Chen, L., & Aklikokou, AK (2020). Determinants of E-government Adoption: Testing the Mediating Effects of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(10), 850–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1660989
  9. Collier, J.E. and Bienstock, C.C. (2009). Model misspecification: contrasting formative and reflective indicators for a model of e-service quality. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(3), 283–293
  10. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003
  11. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. D. & Beale, R. (2004). Human-Computer Interaction (3 edn). London: Addison-Wesley Pearson Education
  12. Elbahnasawy, NG (2021). Can e-government limit the scope of the informal economy? World Development, 139(C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105341
  13. Fitria, NJL (2020). Penerapan work from home dan work from office dengan absensi online sebagai implikasi E-Government di masa new normal. Civil Service Journal, 14(1), 69–84
  14. Glyptis, L., Christofi, M., Vrontis, D., Giudice, M. Del, Dimitriou, S., & Michael, P. (2020). E-Government implementation challenges in small countries: The project manager's perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152(C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119880
  15. Hair, Jr et.al. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed). United States: Pearson
  16. Kasiram, Mohammad. 2008. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif-Kualitatif. Malang: UIN
  17. Kim, C., & Kim, KA (2021). The institutional change from E-Government toward Smarter City; comparative analysis between royal borough of Greenwich, UK, and Seongdong-gu, South Korea. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010042
  18. Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2012). E-Participation, transparency, and trust in local government. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 819–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02593.x
  19. Kurfalı, M., Arifoğlu, A., Tokdemir, G. and Paçin, Y. (2017). Adoption of e-government services in Turkey. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 168–178
  20. Lallmahomed, M.Z.I., Lallmahomed, N. and Lallmahomed, G.M. (2017). Factors influencing the adoption of e-Government services in Mauritius. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 57–72
  21. Lee, Y. and Kozar, K.A. (2006). Investigating the effect of website quality on e-business success: an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1383–1401
  22. Li, Y., & Shang, H. (2020). Service quality, perceived value, and citizens' continuous-use intention regarding e-government: Empirical evidence from China. Information and Management, 57(3), 103197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103197
  23. Mensah, IK, & Adams, S. (2020). A Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Political Trust on the Adoption of E-Government Services. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(8), 682–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1645687
  24. Mutaqin, KA, & Sutoyo, E. (2020). Analysis of Citizens Acceptance for e-Government Services in Bandung, Indonesia: The Use of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model. Bulletin of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, 1(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.25008/bcsee.v1i1.3
  25. Nzaramyimana, L., & Susanto, TD (2019). Analysis of factors affecting behavioural intention to use e-government services in Rwanda. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.133
  26. Pérez-Morote, R., Pontones-Rosa, C., & Núñez-Chicharro, M. (2020). The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154[119973]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119973
  27. Sani, A. (2017). Badan Kepegawaian dan Pengembangan SDM Daerah | Provinsi Kepulauan Bangka Belitung. Retrieved from https://bkpsdmd.babelprov.go.id/content/otonomi-daerah-esensi-tujuan-dan-manfaatnya-bagi-provinsi-kepulauan-bangka-belitung
  28. Tan, P.J.B. (2013). Applying the UTAUT to Understand Factors Affecting the Use of English eLearning Websites in Taiwan. SAGE Open. 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013503837
  29. Yera, A., Arbelaitz, O., Jauregui, O., & Muguerza, J. (2020). Characterization of e-Government adoption in Europe. PLoS ONE, 15(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231585
  30. Yusuf, RMS, & Jumhur, HM (2018). Penerapan E-Government Dalam Membangun Smart City Pada Kota Bandung Tahun 2018. E-Proceeding of Management, 5(3), 3126-3130

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.