DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dialogue.v5i1.15998

PENINGKATKAN KESEJAHTERAAN RUMAH TANGGA PENERIMA MANFAAT DI PERKOTAAN MELALUI PROGRAM KELUARGA HARAPAN PASCA COVID 19

*Topik ISMAIL orcid  -  Balai Besar Pendidikan dan Kesejahteraan Sosial Bandung, Indonesia
Septiana Dwiputrianti orcid scopus  -  Politeknik STIA LAN Bandung, Indonesia
Nita Nurliawati  -  Politeknik STIA LAN Bandung, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Program pengentasan kemiskinan terus menjadi salah satu program prioritas pemerintah, terutama sejak pandemic Covid-19. Data menunjukkan masih tingginya rumah tangga atau masyarakat mengalami kesulitan untuk memenuhi kebutuhan dasar, sementara lingkup pendukungnya kurang memberikan peluang dalam meningkatkan kesejahteraan secara kesinambungan atau untuk keluar dari kerentanan. Penelitian bertujuan menganalisis kondisi kesejahteraan rumah tangga miskin di perkotaan dengan mendekatkan kepada kebutuhan dasar dan lingkup kesejahteraan. dibutuhkan informasi lingkungan pendukung baik dari internal atau eksternal dalam upaya penanggulangan kemiskinan. Studi ini sangat dibutuhkan pemerintah daerah untuk mendukung program pengentasan kemiskinan.  Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan survey dari data kelompok rumah tangga penerima bantuan Program Keluarga Harapan di Kecamatan Babakan Ciparay yang diperoleh dari data e-pkh sejak adanya pandemic Covid 19. Data ini sangat mendukung untuk melakukan analisis tingkat kemiskinan secara multidimensi di wilayah perkotaan melalui Nested Spheres of Poverty (NESP). Studi ini menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata keluarga penerima manfaat yang tinggal di perkotaan menunjukan adanya optimisme untuk menjadi sejahtera, meskipun mereka mengalami krisis kebutuhan dasar dan lingkup kesejahteraan. Rekomendasi diberikan perlunya peningkatan evaluasi kesejahteraan rumah tangga penerima bantuan, agar lebih efektif dan berkelanjutan dengan mendekatkan multidimensi untuk melihat berbagai aspek subjektivitas dan objektivitas (kebutuhan dasar, seperti: pendidikan; kesehatan; standar hidup; dan lingkup kesejahteraan dengan pendekatan Sustainable Livelihoods).

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: kesejahteraan rumah tangga; kemiskinan perkotaan, nested spheres of poverty

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Infrastruktur Dikelurahan Cempedak Rahuk Kecamatan Tanah Putih FACTORS INFLUENCING INTENTION TO USE E-GOVERNMENT SERVICES AMONG STUDENTS IN UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET, INDONESIA Kepemimpinan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Sektor Publik More recent articles
  1. Alatartseva, E., & Barysheva, G. (2015). Well-being: Subjective and Objective Aspects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.479
  2. Alkire, S. (2015). The Capability Approach and Well-Being Measurement for Public Policy. In OPHI Working Paper 94 (Issue November 2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.18
  3. Alkire, S., Foster, J., Seth, S., Santos, M. E., Roche, J. M., & Ballón, P. (2015). Multidimensional Poverty Measurement and Analysis. In Oxford University Press (First, Vol. 11, Issue 3). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689491.001.0001
  4. Alkire, S., Nogales, R., Quinn, N. N., & Suppa, N. (2021). Global multidimensional poverty and COVID-19: A decade of progress at risk? Social Science and Medicine, 291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114457
  5. Azevedo, V., & Robles, M. (2013). Multidimensional Targeting: Identifying Beneficiaries of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs. Social Indicators Research, 112(2), 447–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0255-5
  6. Badolo, F., & Traoré, F. (2015). Impact of rising world rice prices on poverty and inequality in Burkina Faso. Development Policy Review, 33(2), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12099
  7. Behrman, J. R., Gallardo-García, J., Parker, S. W., Todd, P. E., & Vélez-Grajales, V. (2012). Are conditional cash transfers effective in urban areas? Evidence from Mexico. Education Economics, 20(3), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2012.672792
  8. BPS. Gini Ratio Provinsi 2022-2020 webiste https://www.bps.go.id/dynamictable/2017/04/26%2000:00:00/1116/gini-ratio-provinsi-2002-2018.html
  9. BPS. Garis Kemiskinan (Rupiahj/Kapita/Bulan) Menurut Provinsi dan Daerah 2021-2022 website https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/23/195/1/garis-kemiskinan-menurut-provinsi.html
  10. BPS. Jumlah Penduduk Miskin (Ribu Jiwa) Menurut Provinsi dan Daerah 2021-2022 website https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/23/185/1/jumlah-penduduk-miskin-menurut-provinsi.html
  11. Braun, R. A., & Ikeda, D. (2020). Why Cash Transfers Are Good Policy in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Policy Hub, 04. https://doi.org/10.29338/ph2020-04
  12. Budiantoro, S., Fanggidae, V., Saputra, W., Maftuchan, A., & Artha, D. (2013). Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI): Konsep dan Pengukurannya di Indonesia. In PRAKARSA Economic Policy Working Paper
  13. Cahyadi, N., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., Prima, R. A., Satriawan, E., & Syamsulhakim, E. (2020). Cumulative Impacts of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: Experimental Evidence from Indonesia. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 12(4), 88–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20190245
  14. Cahyat, A., Gönner, C., & Haug, M. (2007). Assessing Household Poverty and Wellbeing – A Manual with Examples from Kutai Barat, Indonesia. Center for International Forestry Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/002265
  15. Camfield, L., & Skevington, S. M. (2008). On subjective well-being and quality of life. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(6), 764–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105308093860
  16. Chiappori, P. (2016). Welfare and the Household. March 2018, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.26
  17. Chiappori, P. A., & Meghir, C. M. (2014). INTRA-HOUSEHOLD WELFARE. In NBER Working Papers 20189, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. (Vol. 39, Issue 20189). http://www.nber.org/papers/w20189.pdf
  18. Cummins, R. A. (2018). Subjective Wellbeing as a Social Indicator. Social Indicators Research, 135(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1496-x
  19. Data Kota Bandung. Website Indeks Survey Skor Kecamatan di Kota Bandung: http://data.bandung.go.id/dashboard/indeks-survey/skor-kecamatan di akses 18 Juni 2022
  20. Diener, E. (1984). Subjektive Well-being. In Psychological Bulletin (Vol. 95, Issue 3, pp. 542–575). American Psychological Association, Inc
  21. Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2015). Subjective well-being : a general overview. 39(4), 391–406
  22. Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L., & Diener, M. (1993). The Relationship Between Income and Subjective Well-being Realtive or Absolute? Social Indicators Research, 28, 195–223
  23. Dolan, P., Layard, R., & Metcalfe, R. (2011). Measuring subjective well-being for public policy. February. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/
  24. Etikan, I., & Babatope, O. (2019). A Basic Approach in Sampling Methodology and Sample Size Calculation. Med Life Clin, 1(1006), 50–54
  25. Feng, N. (2021). The Effect of Sibling Size on Childrens Educational Attainmenty: Evidence From Indonesia. ECNU Review of Education, 4(4), 830–856. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/209653112092170
  26. Gonner, C., Haug, M., Cahyat, Wollenberg, de Jong, W., Limberg, G., Cronkleton, P., Moeliono, M., & Becker. (2007). Capturing nested spheres of poverty: a model for multidimensional poverty analysis and monitoring. Capturing Nested Spheres of Poverty: A Model for Multidimensional Poverty Analysis and Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/002255
  27. Hadna, A. H., & Askar, M. W. (2022). The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Low-Income Individuals in Indonesia. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 15(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0067
  28. Hastuti, Ruhmaniyati, & Widyaningsih, D. (2020). Pelaksanaan PKH dan Program Sembako dalam Rangka Mitigasi Dampak Covid-19. In Catatan Penelitian SMERU (Issue 2)
  29. Hayati, H., & Syafrida Nasution, E. (2020). Influencing Factors to the Family Welfare in Mulyasejati Village Torwards Citarum Harum. KnE Social Sciences, 2020, 194–205. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i14.7873
  30. Ismail, T., Dwiputranti, S., & Nurliawati, N. (2022). Faktor Kesejahteraan Objektif Dalam Subjektifitas Penerima Manfaat Program Keluarga Harapan Di Wilayah Perkotaan. Jurnal Media Administrasi Terapan, 03(2), 158–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31113/jmat.v3i2.63
  31. Kalama, K. K., Hoqueb, M. K. A., & Jahanc, W. (2021). Ichrd 2021. April. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Khaled-Kalam-2/publication/351578708_INTERNATIONAL_SEMINAR_ON_HUMAN_RESOURCE_DEVELOPMENT_ICHRD_2021_ICHRD_2021_Analysis_of_Financial_Performance_and_Corporate_Sustainability_Performance_Linkage_Evidence_from_the_Bankin
  32. Kementrian Sosial. Sebaran KPM dan SDM PKH di Indonesia. Website https://pkh.kemensos.go.id/?pg=dashome
  33. Khomaini, A. A. (2020). Dampak Program Bantuan Tunai (Cash Transfer) terhadap Kesejahteraan Subyektif di Indonesia. Indonesian Treasury Review Jurnal Perbendaharaan Keuangan Negara Dan Kebijakan Publik, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.33105/itrev.v5i1.161
  34. Kittiprapas, S. (2009). Subjective-well-being: New paradigm for measuring progress and public policies. 3rd OECD World Forum
  35. Kuhumab, S. K. (2018). Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach as theoretical foundation of human development. Journal of Sociology and Development, 1(March), 128–134
  36. Lehman, A. F., Rachuba, L. T., & Postrado, L. T. (1995). Demographic influences on quality of life among persons with chronic mental illnesses. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(95)00006-W
  37. Levine, S., Batana, J., Muwonge, & Maweki, Y. (2012). OPHI W ORKING P APER N O . 55 A Robust Multidimensional Poverty Profile for Uganda. In Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative. http://ophi.qeh.ox.ac.uk/
  38. Martínez, D. M., & Maia, A. G. (2018). The Impacts of Cash Transfers on Subjective Wellbeing and Poverty: The Case of Colombia. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 39(4), 616–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-018-9585-4
  39. McGuire, J., Kaiser, C., & Bach-Mortensen, A. M. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of cash transfers on subjective well-being and mental health in low- and middle-income countries. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(3), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01252-z
  40. Muhammed, Z., & Abubakar, I. R. (2020). Improving the Quality of Life of Urban Communities in Developing Countries. January, 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95726-5_25
  41. Nieto-Aleman, P. A., Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, J. M., Roig-Tierno, N., & Mas-Verdú, F. (2019). Factors of regional poverty reduction in Colombia: Do institutional conditions matter? Social Policy and Administration, 53(7), 1045–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12474
  42. Nugroho, T. W., Hanani, N., Toiba, H., & Sujarwo, S. (2022). Promoting Subjective Well‐Being among Rural and Urban Residents in Indonesia: Does Social Capital Matter? Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042375
  43. Pukuh, N., & Widyasthika, H. F. (2018). Women Left Behind? Findings from Female Headed Household in Indonesia. International Conference and Workshop on Gender, October, 397–410
  44. Puteri, G. C. (2021). The Importance Of Strengthening Mechanism And Instruments For Resertification/Graduation Of Family Hope Program Beneficiaries. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Terapan, 3(2), 41–46. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.7454/Jsht.V3i2.140
  45. Ravindra Deyshappriya, N. ., & Minuwanthi, R. W. W. . (2020). Determinants of Poverty: Is Age Non-Linearly Related with Poverty? Evidence from Sri Lanka. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 10(4), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2020.104.181.192
  46. Rojas, M. (2014). Well-being and the Complexity of Poverty : A Subjective Well-being Approach. January
  47. Rossel, C., Courtoisie, D., & Marsiglia, M. (2019). How could conditional cash transfer programme conditionalities reinforce vulnerability? Non-compliers and policy implementation gaps in Uruguay’s Family Allowances. Development Policy Review, 37(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12327
  48. Rubio-Sanchez, Y. Y., Rodríguez-Juárez, E., & Polo Jiménez, S. D. (2021). Effect of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs When the Head of the Household Is Female in Mexico. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 22(3), 3–12
  49. Rukumnuaykit, P. (2015). Urbanisation, Poverty and Subjective Well-Being: Empirical Evidence from Thailand. Urban Policy and Research, 33(1), 98–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2014.980901
  50. Sembiring, R. K. (2022). Analysis of Non Poor Households Have Received Conditional Cash Transfer. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Pembangunan, 5(1), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.33005/jdep.v5i1.316
  51. Serrat, O. (2017). Knowledge Solutions: Tools, Methods, and Approaches to Drive Organizational Performance. Knowledge Solutions: Tools, Methods, and Approaches to Drive Organizational Performance, 1–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9
  52. Su, F., Song, N., Ma, N., Sultanaliev, A., Ma, J., Xue, B., & Fahad, S. (2021). An assessment of poverty alleviation measures and sustainable livelihood capability of farm households in rural china: A sustainable livelihood approach. Agriculture (Switzerland), 11(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11121230
  53. Syamsulhakim, E., & Khadijah, N. (2021). Graduating from a Conditional Cash Transfer Program in Indonesia. In Graduating from a Conditional Cash Transfer Program in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1596/36784
  54. Taherdoost, H. (2020). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology ; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research Hamed Taherdoost To cite this version : HAL Id : hal-02546796 Sampling Methods in Research Methodology ; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 5(2296–1747), 18–27
  55. Takeshi, A. (2018). Subjective Well-Being and Objective Poverty Indices: Evidence from Panel Data in South Africa Takeshi Aida. 1–6
  56. Thaariq, R. M., Wahyu, M. F. R., Ningrum, D. R., & Aidha, C. N. (2020). Prakarsa Working Paper 01 - Multidimensional Poverty and the Risk of COVID-19 in Indonesia. Perkumpulan PRAKARSA
  57. Weyers, S., Dragano, N., Möbus, S., Beck, E. M., Stang, A., Möhlenkamp, S., Jöckel, K. H., Erbel, R., & Siegrist, J. (2008). Low socio-economic position is associated with poor social networks and social support: Results from the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. International Journal for Equity in Health, 7, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-7-13
  58. Wietzke, F.-B. (2015). Who is poorest? An asset-based analysis of multidimensional wellbeing. Development Policy Review, 33(1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12091
  59. World Bank. (2011). Program Keluarga Harapan: Main Findings from the Impact Evaluation of Indonesia’s Pilot Household Conditional Cash Transfer Program (Issue June)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.