skip to main content

Urgensi Transformasi Pelayanan Publik melalui E-Government Pada New Normal dan Reformasi Regulasi Birokrasi

*Anggita Doramia Lumbanraja  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Covid-19 pandemic has a significant impact on society in Indonesia. New Normal discourse will be applied soon in Indonesia. Basically, it will give the same restriction and limitation of the interaction between individuals. Before pandemic, Conventional Public services required direct interaction between citizens and public servants in public office. But then, there will be a limitation to this direct interaction, and it also has to switch into the online services model. This study examined the urgency of the transformation of public services during the New Normal period through E-Government. This research used the normative juridical method. The author finds that the use of e-government in Indonesia is still far below Singapore. Indonesia needs to optimize the use of vertical and horizontal integration models that present one-stop service network services that require the transformation of public services from the Old Public Administration model to the New Public Service. This transformation should also be supported by regulatory reforms in the field of State Administration to increase synergy and harmonization between government institutions, so there is no overlapping of authority and conflicts between institutions that can hinder service delivery to the public.

 

Keywords : Transformation of Government Services; E-Government; New Normal

 

Abstrak

 

Pandemi Covid-19 membawa dampak yang besar bagi masyarakat di Indonesia. Wacana New Normal yang akan diberlakukan, secara garis besar tetap membatasi interaksi antar individu. Pelayanan publik yang selama ini dilakukan dengan beinteraksi secara langsung harus dibatasi bahkan harus beralih kepada pelayanan secara online. Penelitian ini hendak mengkaji urgensi transformasi pelayanan publik pada masa New Normal melalui E-Government. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif. Penulis menemukan bahwa penggunaan e-government di Indonesia masih jauh di bawah negara Singapura. Indonesia perlu mengoptimalkan penggunaan model integrasi vertikal dan integrasi horizontal yang menghadirkan network service layanan satu pintu yang membutuhkan transformasi pelayanan publik dari model Old Administration Public menuju New Public Service. Hal ini perlu juga ditunjang dengan adanya reformasi regulasi di bidang Administrasi Negara untuk meningkatkan sinergitas dan harmonisasi antar lembaga pemerintah, agar tidak terjadi tumpang tindih kewenangan dan konflik antar lembaga yang dapat menghambat pemberian layanan kepada masyarakat.

 

Kata Kunci : Transformasi Pelayanan Publik; E-Government; New Normal
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Transformasi Pelayanan Publik; E-Government; New Normal

Article Metrics:

  1. McClure, D. L. (2000). Statement of David L. McClure, U.S. General Accounting Office, before the Subcommittee on Government Management, Information and Technology, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives. Available: http://www.gao.gov
  2. Denhardt, Janet, V., & Denhardt, Robert B. (2003). The New Public Service. Armonk, New York : M.E. Sharpe
  3. Agostino, Deborah., Arnaboldi, Michela., & Lema, Melisa Diaz. (2012). Public Money and Management, pp 1-4 https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1764206
  4. Fang, Zhiyuan. (2002). E-Government in Digital Era : Concept, Practice, and Development. International Journal of The Computer, The Internet and Management, Vol 10, No 2, pp 1-22
  5. Hermana, Budi, & Silfianti, Widya. (2011). Evaluating E-Government Implementation by Local Government : Digital Divide in Internet Based Public Services in Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol 2, No 3, pp 156-163
  6. Himawan, Hidayatulah. (2012). Implementasi Dan Analisa Regulasi Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Mendukung Perkembangan E-Government. Seminar Nasional Informatika (SEMNASIF), Vol 1, No 4
  7. Layne, Karen, & Lee, Jungwoo. (2001). Developing Fully Functional E-Government : A Four Stage Model. Government Information Quarterly, Vol 18, Issue 2, pp 122-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
  8. Silcock, Rachel. (2001). What is E-Government?. Parliamentary Affairs, Vol 54, Issue 1, pp 88-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/54.1.88
  9. United Nations. (2008). UN E-Government Survey 2008: From E-Government to Connected Governance. New York: United Nations Publication
  10. United Nations. (2010). UN E-Government Survey 2010: Leveraging E-Government at a Time of Financial and Economic Crisis. New York: United Nations Publication
  11. United Nations. (2012). UN E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for The People. New York: United Nations Publication
  12. United Nations. (2014). UN E-Government Survey 2014: E-Government For The Future We Want. New York: United Nations Publication
  13. United Nations. (2016). UN E-Government Survey 2016: E-Government for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations Publication
  14. United Nations. (2018). UN E-Government Survey 2018 : FromGearing E-Government to Support Transformation Towards Sustainable and Resilient Societies. New York : United Nations Publication
  15. Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
  16. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Kebijakan dan Strategi Nasional Pengembangan E-Government
  17. Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik
  18. PP Nomor 82 Tahun 2012 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik
  19. Instruksi Presiden 3 Tahun 2003 tentang Kebijakan dan Strategi Nasional Pengembangan E-Government

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.