BibTex Citation Data :
@article{ALJ6532, author = {Budi Ispriyarso}, title = {Penyatuan Pembinaan Pengadilan Pajak}, journal = {Administrative Law and Governance Journal}, volume = {2}, number = {4}, year = {2019}, keywords = {}, abstract = { Abstract Tax Courts in Indonesia based on Law Number 14 of 2002 concerning Tax Courts. Tax Court contains many weaknesses. One of its weaknesses is the dualism of building the Tax Court, namely the Ministry of Finance and the Supreme Court. This dualism of formation must be eliminated. The problem is how to eliminate the dualism of coaching. The dualism of coaching the Tax Court can be removed by uniting the coaching of the Tax Court in both the technical coaching of the judiciary and the coaching of the organization, administration, and finance under the Supreme Court. The dualism provisions of coaching the tax court in the Tax Court Law must be immediately amended. Keywords: Coaching Dualism, Tax Court, Integration . Abstrak Pengadilan Pajak di Indonesia berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2002 tentang Pengadilan Pajak. Pengadilan Pajak, banyak mengandung kelemahan. Salah satu kelemahannya adalah adanya dualisme pembinaan Pengadilan Pajak, yaitu oleh Kementerian Keuangan dan Mahkamah Agung. Dualisme pembinaan ini harus dihilangkan. Permasahannya adalah bagaimana cara menghilangkan dualisme pembinaan tersebut. Dualisme pembinaan Pengadilan Pajak, dapat dihilangkan dengan cara menyatukan pembinaan Pengadilan Pajak baik pembinaan teknis peradilan maupun pembinaan organisasi, administrasi dan keuangan di bawah Mahkamah Agung. Ketentuan dualisme pembinaan pengadilan pajak dalam UU Pengadilan Pajak harus segera diubah. Kata Kunci : Dualisme Pembinaan, Pengadilan Pajak, Penyatuan. }, issn = {2621-2781}, pages = {650--660} doi = {10.14710/alj.v2i4.650-660}, url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/alj/article/view/6532} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Abstract
Tax Courts in Indonesia based on Law Number 14 of 2002 concerning Tax Courts. Tax Court contains many weaknesses. One of its weaknesses is the dualism of building the Tax Court, namely the Ministry of Finance and the Supreme Court. This dualism of formation must be eliminated. The problem is how to eliminate the dualism of coaching. The dualism of coaching the Tax Court can be removed by uniting the coaching of the Tax Court in both the technical coaching of the judiciary and the coaching of the organization, administration, and finance under the Supreme Court. The dualism provisions of coaching the tax court in the Tax Court Law must be immediately amended.
Keywords: Coaching Dualism, Tax Court, Integration.
Abstrak
Pengadilan Pajak di Indonesia berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2002 tentang Pengadilan Pajak. Pengadilan Pajak, banyak mengandung kelemahan. Salah satu kelemahannya adalah adanya dualisme pembinaan Pengadilan Pajak, yaitu oleh Kementerian Keuangan dan Mahkamah Agung. Dualisme pembinaan ini harus dihilangkan. Permasahannya adalah bagaimana cara menghilangkan dualisme pembinaan tersebut. Dualisme pembinaan Pengadilan Pajak, dapat dihilangkan dengan cara menyatukan pembinaan Pengadilan Pajak baik pembinaan teknis peradilan maupun pembinaan organisasi, administrasi dan keuangan di bawah Mahkamah Agung. Ketentuan dualisme pembinaan pengadilan pajak dalam UU Pengadilan Pajak harus segera diubah.
Kata Kunci : Dualisme Pembinaan, Pengadilan Pajak, Penyatuan.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Administrative Law & Governance Journal published by State Administrative Law Department Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to the Administrative Law & Governance Journal and Administrative Law Department, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University as the publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses the rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Administrative Law & Governance Journal and Administrative Law Department, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the Administrative Law & Governance Journal are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form Administrative Law & Governance Journal]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original mail, scanned document:
Muhamad Azhar (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of Administrative Law & Governance Journal
Administrative Law Department, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University
Campus Prof. Dr. Satjipto Raharjo, S.H,Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH., Tembalang, SemarangIndonesia 50275
Administrative Law and Governance Journal (e-ISSN 2621-2781) published by the State Administrative Law Department
Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
alj@live.undip.ac.id
https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/alj