BibTex Citation Data :
@article{Agrisocionomics26380, author = {Fatmawati Kaddas and Firlawanti Baguna and Hamidin Rasulu and Mila Fatmawati}, title = {Risk Analysis of Mulu Bebe Banana Farming in West Halmahera Regency Province North Maluku}, journal = {Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian}, volume = {9}, number = {3}, year = {2025}, keywords = {Mulu Bebe Banana, Risk Analysis, Production Risk, Income Risk, Risk Mitigation}, abstract = { Food production problems can contribute to global food and energy inflation; therefore, this study aims to identify the risks faced by farmers in developing Mulu Bebe banana farming, analyze the levels of production and income risks, and explore appropriate mitigation strategies. The research was conducted in West Halmahera Regency, which serves as the main production center for Mulu Bebe bananas. The study employed interviews and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) to identify key risks experienced by local farmers. These findings were analyzed using a comprehensive risk assessment approach, including calculations of the likelihood and consequences of each risk, categorization into risk levels, grouping of risks, and prioritization of mitigation strategies, all of which were visualized through a risk map. The risks associated with Mulu Bebe banana farming were classified into two main categories: production risk and income risk. Based on the analysis, both risk types showed a coefficient of variation (CV) of less than 0.5 and a lower limit value (L) greater than 0. These indicators suggest that Mulu Bebe banana farmers generally operate under low-risk conditions and are likely to avoid significant losses in both production and income. This farming system is not entirely free from risk. Risk identification based on production and income aspects revealed several sources of risk ranging from low to high levels. The most critical risk, categorized as high, is related to technical errors in the cultivation process. Medium-level risks include pest attacks, input prices such as fertilizers and herbicides, fruit quality, seed availability, planting area, weather and climate conditions, and banana distribution infrastructure. Meanwhile, consumer preference was identified as a relatively low risk. }, issn = {2621-9778}, pages = {915--935} doi = {10.14710/agrisocionomics.v9i3.26380}, url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/agrisocionomics/article/view/26380} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Food production problems can contribute to global food and energy inflation; therefore, this study aims to identify the risks faced by farmers in developing Mulu Bebe banana farming, analyze the levels of production and income risks, and explore appropriate mitigation strategies. The research was conducted in West Halmahera Regency, which serves as the main production center for Mulu Bebe bananas. The study employed interviews and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) to identify key risks experienced by local farmers. These findings were analyzed using a comprehensive risk assessment approach, including calculations of the likelihood and consequences of each risk, categorization into risk levels, grouping of risks, and prioritization of mitigation strategies, all of which were visualized through a risk map. The risks associated with Mulu Bebe banana farming were classified into two main categories: production risk and income risk. Based on the analysis, both risk types showed a coefficient of variation (CV) of less than 0.5 and a lower limit value (L) greater than 0. These indicators suggest that Mulu Bebe banana farmers generally operate under low-risk conditions and are likely to avoid significant losses in both production and income. This farming system is not entirely free from risk. Risk identification based on production and income aspects revealed several sources of risk ranging from low to high levels. The most critical risk, categorized as high, is related to technical errors in the cultivation process. Medium-level risks include pest attacks, input prices such as fertilizers and herbicides, fruit quality, seed availability, planting area, weather and climate conditions, and banana distribution infrastructure. Meanwhile, consumer preference was identified as a relatively low risk.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Starting from 2021, the author(s) whose article is published in the Agrisocionomics journal attain the copyright for their article. By submitting the manuscript to Agrisocionomics, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.
The author(s) guarantee that:
The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
If the article was prepared jointly by more than one author, each author submitting the manuscript warrants that they have been given permission by all co-authors to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf, and agree to notify the co-authors of the terms of this policy. Agrisocionomics will not be held responsible for anything that may arise because of the writer's internal dispute. Agrisocionomics will only communicate with correspondence authors.
Authors should also understand that once published, their articles (and any additional files, including data sets, and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently featured on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Agrisocionomics allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Agrisocionomics to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.
View My Stats