DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v9i3.27479

Analysis of Qr Code Technology Acceptance in Cocoa Production Forecasting Based on Motivation, Farmer Characteristics, and Innovation Nature

*Ramdan Ramdan  -  Postgraduate Agricultural Economic Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Padjajaran University, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Iwan Setiawan orcid scopus  -  Department of Agro Socio-Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia, Indonesia
Anne Charina orcid scopus  -  Department of Agro Socio-Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2025 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

QR Code technology is used to help record cocoa production forecasts efficiently and accurately, so that farmers can easily update data in real-time. However, in its application, farmers still record production forecasts manually, which often results in discrepancies between forecasts and actual results and takes a long time in the process. This study aims to analyze QR Code technology acceptance among farmers assisted by PT X in the process of forecasting cocoa production in terms of the influence of motivation, farmer characteristics, and the nature of the innovation contained in the technology. This study used a quantitative verification method, supported by the SEM-PLS analysis tool. Samples were taken using a census method from 108 cocoa farmers assisted by PT X  in Bulungan Regency. The results of the study showed that motivation, farmer characteristics, and the nature of innovation have a direct, positive and significant effect on QR code technology acceptance. Furthermore, QR Code technology acceptance is positively and significantly influenced by farmer characteristics through motivation as a mediating variable. However, the nature of innovation does not have a positive and significant effect on QR Code technology acceptance through motivation, and the nature of innovation also does not have a direct, positive and significant effect on motivation. These findings confirm that farmer motivation and characteristics need to be improved to increase QR Code technology acceptance. This will enable production forecasting to generate accurate data to inform cocoa production decisions and ensure the availability of cocoa bean raw materials for processors.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: motivation, nature of technological innovation, production forecasting, qr code, technology acceptance

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Farmers' Participation as an Accelerator in Digital Agriculture in Kendal Regency Sustainability Assessment of Integrated Pest Management Rice Farms to Enchange Food Security in Kediri District Risk Analysis of Mulu Bebe Banana Farming in West Halmahera Regency Province North Maluku More recent articles
  1. Alisambatra, R. V., Herimpitia, A. H., & Alfa, R. M. (2023). Impact Of Innovation In Agricultural Practice. The Case Of Lake Alaotra, Madagascar. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Review, 4(1), 48–59
  2. Amanathi, A., Setiawan, E., & Usman, M. (2023). Goodness Of Fit Test In Structural Equation Modeling with Unweighted Least Square (ULS) Estimation Method. Sciencestatistics: Journal of Statistics, Probability, and Its Application, 1(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.24127/sciencestatistics.v1i2.5021
  3. Ambong, R. M. A., & Paulino, M. A. (2020). Analyzing Rice Farmers’ Intention to Adopt Modern Rice Technologies Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Asian Research Journal of Agriculture, 13(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.9734/arja/2020/v13i130094
  4. Baluta, T., Chua, Z. L., Meel, K. S., & Saxena, P. (2021). Scalable quantitative verification for deep neural networks. Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering, 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00039
  5. Central Bureau of Statistics (2025). North Kalimantan Province in Figures. Central Bureau of Statistics of North Kalimantan Province
  6. Central Statistics Agency of North Kalimantan. (2024). Area of Plantation Crops in North Kalimantan by Regency/City (Hectares), 2021-2023
  7. East Kalimantan Plantation Service (2022). Berau Cocoa Obtains Geographical Indication Certificate. https://disbun.kaltimprov.go.id/artikel/kakao-berau-peroleh-sertifikat-indikasi-geografis
  8. Dong, Q., Chen, X., & Huang, B. (2024). Chapter 17 - Structural equation model. In Q. Dong, X. Chen, & B. Huang (Eds.), Data Analysis in Pavement Engineering (pp. 315–336). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15928-2.00010-0
  9. Elviana, D., & Inten, S. (2019). Study Of Motivation And Perception Of Cocoa (Theobroma Cacao L.) Commodity Farmers As An Effort To Develop Border Areas (Case Study Of Farmers In Maspul Village, Sebatik Tengah District, Nunukan Regency). Jurnal Hexagro, 3(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.36423/hexagro.v3i1.306
  10. Fahrenberg, U. (2022). A Generic Approach to Quantitative Verification. http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.11302
  11. Francisco, J. C. S., Mamangon, L. G. F., Pagaduan, E. E., C, R. L., & D, A. V. D. P. (2024). Farmers ’ Digital Transformation Preferences : Acceptability , Affordability , Accessibility , Awareness , and Availability. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science, 7, 9–12
  12. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) - Joseph F. Hair, Jr., G. Tomas M. Hult, Christian Ringle, Marko Sarstedt. In Sage
  13. Huang, Y., & Fu, S. (2023). Understanding farmers’ intentions to participate in traceability systems: evidence from SEM-ANN-NCA. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7(December), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1246122
  14. Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia (2023). COCOA PLANTATION COMMODITY OUTLOOK BOOK. Agricultural Data and Information System Center, Secretariat General - Ministry of Agriculture
  15. Larasati, N., Putri, A. A., Soemodinoto, A. S., Alyssa, N., & Shoofiyani, O. S. (2024). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model to understand farmer’s readiness: Implementation of precision agriculture based on digital IoT monitoring apps in West Java, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 14(4), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.55493/5005.v14i4.5258
  16. Mariati, R., Aida, S., & Aisy, D. N. R. (2023). Potential and Prospects for the Development of Cocoa Plants (Theobroma cacao L.) in Antutan Village, Tanjung Palas District, Bulungan Regency. J. Agrifarm, 12(2)
  17. Mariyono, J., & Kuntariningsih, A. (2024). Empowering farmer community with technology modernisation to improve rice farming performance through demonstration farms in East Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-12-2023-0271
  18. McCaig, M., Dara, R., & Rezania, D. (2023). Farmer-centric design thinking principles for smart farming technologies. Internet of Things, 23, 100898. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2023.100898
  19. McCormack, M., Buckley, C., & Kelly, E. (2021). Using a Technology Acceptance Model to investigate what factors influence farmer adoption of a nutrient management plan. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research, 60(1), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.15212/ijafr-2020-0134
  20. Park, I., Kim, D., Moon, J., Kim, S., Kang, Y., & Bae, S. (2022). Searching for New Technology Acceptance Model under Social Context: Analyzing the Determinants of Acceptance of Intelligent Information Technology in Digital Transformation and Implications for the Requisites of Digital Sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010579
  21. Patil, V., & Veettil, P. C. (2024). Farmers’ risk attitude, agricultural technology adoption and impacts in Eastern India. Agriculture and Food Security, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-024-00497-x
  22. Patricia, A., Vergel, R., Valentina, A., Rodriguez, C., Ramirez, O. D., Andrea, P., Velilla, A., & Gallego, A. M. (2022). A Crop Modelling Strategy to Improve Cacao Quality and Productivity. Plants, 1–16. https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/2/157
  23. Pedersen, S. M., Erekalo, K. T., Christensen, T., Denver, S., Gemtou, M., Fountas, S., Isakhanyan, G., Rosemarin, A., Ekane, N., Puggaard, L., Nertinger, M., Brinks, H., Puško, D., & Adrián, J. B. (2024). Drivers and barriers to climate-smart agricultural practices and technologies adoption: Insights from stakeholders of five European food supply chains. Smart Agricultural Technology, 8, 100478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100478
  24. Salleh, M. N. Bin, Azmi, R. S. B., Osman, W. N. Bin, Zulhumadi, F. Bin, & Zainol, M. R. Bin. (2024). Examining Factors Influencing Continuous Adoption of Drone Technology in Malaysian Paddy Farming Using an Adapted UTAUT Model. 2024 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems (ICAMechS), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAMechS63130.2024.10818828
  25. Sarie, F., Mohammad, W., Jamin, N. S., & Ramlan, W. (2023). The Influence of Demographic Factors, Farmer Knowledge, and Motivational Factors on the Adoption of Agricultural Technology Innovation: A Case Study on Dairy Farmers in South Bangka. West Science Agro, 1(01), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsa.v1i01.374
  26. Schukat, S., & Heise, H. (2021). Towards an understanding of the behavioral intentions and actual use of smart products among german farmers. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126666
  27. Setiawan, P., Setiawan, I., & Hapsari, H. (2023). Development Pattern of Kampung Agro Innovation System in Banjar City. Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 7(3), 671–683. https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v7i3.17439
  28. Syahza, A. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian. In Rake Sarasin (Revisi, Vol. 52, Issue Agustus). UR Press
  29. Tang, C.-W., Chang, Y.-H., Albanese, D. L., & Chuang, H.-H. (2024). The Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Studies of EMI: An Empirical Demonstration and Application Prospect. In S. M. Curle & J. Pun (Eds.), Researching English Medium Instruction: Quantitative Methods for Students and Researchers (pp. 73–91). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/9781009425407.010
  30. Thakkar, J. J. (2020). Introduction to Structural Equation Modelling. In Structural Equation Modelling: Application for Research and Practice (with AMOS and R) (pp. 1–11). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3793-6_1
  31. Ullah, A., Saqib, S. E., & Kächele, H. (2022). Determinants of Farmers’ Awareness and Adoption of Extension Recommended Wheat Varieties in the Rainfed Areas of Pakistan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063194
  32. Ventura, R. (2019). Quantitative methods in philosophy of language. Philosophy Compass, 14(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12609
  33. Widayanto, B., Senjawati, N. D., Rini, W. D. E., Utami, H. H., & Kafiya, M. (2022). Research Mentoring Methods. In Sleman: LPPM UPN Veteran Yogyakarta (Issue 0274)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.