ANALYSIS OF FARMERS’ RISK PREFERENCES IN RICE FARMING INSURANCE PROGRAM IN SRAGEN REGENCY

Mochammad Immam Dzulfriansyah; Wiludjeng Roessali; I Ketut Kariyasa

doi:10.14710/agrisocionomics.v8i3.20760

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v8i3.20760

ANALYSIS OF FARMERS’ RISK PREFERENCES IN RICE FARMING INSURANCE PROGRAM IN SRAGEN REGENCY

*Mochammad Immam Dzulfriansyah - Agribusiness, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, Indonesia

Wiludjeng Roessali - Agribusiness, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, Indonesia

I Ketut Kariyasa - Ministry of Agriculture, Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{Agrisocionomics20760,
    author = {Mochammad Dzulfriansyah and Wiludjeng Roessali and I Ketut Kariyasa},
    title = {ANALYSIS OF FARMERS’ RISK PREFERENCES IN RICE FARMING INSURANCE PROGRAM IN SRAGEN REGENCY},
    journal = {Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian},
  volume = {8},
    number = {3},
    year = {2024},
    keywords = {agriculture insurance, rice farming, risk, risk preference},
    abstract = { Rice farming is closely related to climate and weather in the business process, especially the on-farm process in the crop area. Climate risk in rice farming is closely related to the occurrence of floods, droughts, and attacks of Plant Disturbing Organisms (OPT). Therefore, it is necessary to overcome uncertainty to protect farmers and their farms, namely agricultural insurance. Agricultural insurance shows partiality to farmers to anticipate the risk of farming losses. Sragen Regency is one of the rice production centers in Central Java Province, so its farms need to be protected from risks through Rice Farming Insurance (AUTP). The purpose of this study is to analyze farmers' behavior in conducting rice farming through their risk preferences in Sragen Regency. The research was conducted using the survey method. Data were collected by interview technique using questionnaires. The number of samples taken from 100 rice farmers in Sragen Regency from three representative Sub-districts with specific criteria, namely Tanon Sub-district, Sidoharjo Sub-district, and Sambirejo Sub-district. The population in this study are rice farmers who participated in the Rice Farming Insurance (AUTP) program from 2018 to 2020. Data analysis uses the Multiple Price List (MPL) approach. Some previous studies analysing farmers' willingness to pay premiums in the AUTP programme have not included farmers' risk preference factors in the analysis. In addition, there is no research that discusses farmers' willingness to pay for AUTP premiums in Sragen Regency. Therefore, this research is expected to be a literature study in formulating strategies related to the implementation of the AUTP programme in the future by considering farmers' risk preferences, especially in Sragen Regency. The results showed that rice farmers in Sragen Regency have a very risk-averse risk preference, which means that they are risk-averse individuals when farming. Therefore, the Rice Farming Insurance (AUTP) program can be utilized by farmers as a form of risk mitigation implementation in their farming operations. },
   issn = {2621-9778},   pages = {712--724}  doi = {10.14710/agrisocionomics.v8i3.20760},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/agrisocionomics/article/view/20760}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Rice farming is closely related to climate and weather in the business process, especially the on-farm process in the crop area. Climate risk in rice farming is closely related to the occurrence of floods, droughts, and attacks of Plant Disturbing Organisms (OPT). Therefore, it is necessary to overcome uncertainty to protect farmers and their farms, namely agricultural insurance. Agricultural insurance shows partiality to farmers to anticipate the risk of farming losses. Sragen Regency is one of the rice production centers in Central Java Province, so its farms need to be protected from risks through Rice Farming Insurance (AUTP). The purpose of this study is to analyze farmers' behavior in conducting rice farming through their risk preferences in Sragen Regency. The research was conducted using the survey method. Data were collected by interview technique using questionnaires. The number of samples taken from 100 rice farmers in Sragen Regency from three representative Sub-districts with specific criteria, namely Tanon Sub-district, Sidoharjo Sub-district, and Sambirejo Sub-district. The population in this study are rice farmers who participated in the Rice Farming Insurance (AUTP) program from 2018 to 2020. Data analysis uses the Multiple Price List (MPL) approach. Some previous studies analysing farmers' willingness to pay premiums in the AUTP programme have not included farmers' risk preference factors in the analysis. In addition, there is no research that discusses farmers' willingness to pay for AUTP premiums in Sragen Regency. Therefore, this research is expected to be a literature study in formulating strategies related to the implementation of the AUTP programme in the future by considering farmers' risk preferences, especially in Sragen Regency. The results showed that rice farmers in Sragen Regency have a very risk-averse risk preference, which means that they are risk-averse individuals when farming. Therefore, the Rice Farming Insurance (AUTP) program can be utilized by farmers as a form of risk mitigation implementation in their farming operations.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: agriculture insurance, rice farming, risk, risk preference

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 8, No 3 (2024): November 2024

Recent articles

TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF LEISA SYSTEM SHALLOT FARMING IN BANTUL REGENCY A COLLABORATIVE MODEL FOR SUSTAINABLE COCOA PRODUCTION THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL ON THE SUCCESS OF URBAN FARMING PROGRAMS AT THE DAHLIA FARMERS' GROUP SEMARANG CITY More recent articles

Ainurrahman, F., Fariyanti, A., & Tinaprilla, N. 2022. Preferensi Risiko dan Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Keikutsertaan Asuransi Usahatani Padi (AUTP) di Kabupaten Jember. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia (Journal of Indonesian Agribusiness), 10(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.29244/jai.2022.10.2.235-245
Anderson, L. R., & Mellor, J. M. 2009. Are Risk Preferences Stable? Comparing an Experimental Measure with a Validated Survey-based Measure. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39(2), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11166-009-9075-Z/TABLES/6
Aripbilah, S. N., & Suprapto, H. 2021. Analisis Kekeringan di Kabupaten Sragen Dengan Metode Palmer, Thornthwaite, dan Standardized Precipitation Index. Jurnal Sumber Daya Air, 17(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.32679/JSDA.V17I2.742
Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah Provinsi Jawa Tengah. 2015. Dokumen Kejadian Risiko Bencana (KRB) Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2016-2020
BMKG. 2022. Climate Outlook 2023
BPS Kabupaten Sragen. (2017). Letak Geografi Kabupaten Sragen. https://sragenkab.bps.go.id/statictable/2017/02/22/273/letak-geografi-kabupaten-sragen.html
Dewi, L. U. H. W. L., & Suamba, I. K. 2020. Manfaat Asuransi Usahatani Padi dalam Menanggulangi Risiko Usahatani Krama Subak di Kecamatan Penebel Kabupaten Tabanan. Jurnal Agribisnis Dan Agrowisata E-ISSN, 2685, 3809
Di Falco, S., & Vieider, F. M. 2022. Environmental Adaptation of Risk Preferences. The Economic Journal, 132(648), 2737–2766. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueac030
Ditjen Prasarana dan Sarana Pertanian Kementerian Pertanian. 2022. Realisasi Asuransi Usaha Tani Padi Provinsi Jawa Tengah 2017-2021
Estiningtyas, W. 2015. Asuransi Pertanian Berbasis Indeks Iklim: Opsi Pemberdayaan Dan Perlindungan Petani Terhadap Risiko Iklim. Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2017/jsdl.v9n1.2015.%p
Fahad, S., & Jing, W. 2018. Evaluation of Pakistani farmers’ willingness to pay for crop insurance using contingent valuation method: The case of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. Land Use Policy, 72, 570–577. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.024
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. 2002. Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects. The American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3083270
Jin, J., Wang, W., & Wang, X. 2016. Farmers’ Risk Preferences and Agricultural Weather Index Insurance Uptake in Rural China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 7(4), 366–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13753-016-0108-3/TABLES/7
Lybaws, D. F., Alamsyah, Z., & Nainggolan, S. 2020. Analisis Preferensi Risiko Produksi dan Hubungannya dengan Keikutsertaan Petani dalam Program Asuransi Usahatani Padi (AUTP) di Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur. Journal of Agribusiness and Local Wisdom, 3(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/jalow.v3i1.9788
Mohapatra, L., Dhaliwal, R. K., & Kaur, M. 2016. Farmers knowledge about the agricultural insurance scheme in Punjab. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 16(1), 49–53
Muraya, D., Chege, S., & Munyiri, S. 2024. Determinants of Khat Farmers' Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Insurance. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 9(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20240902.15
Nordmeyer, E. F., & Mußhoff, O. 2023. Understanding German farmers’ intention to adopt drought insurance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118866. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118866
Pasaribu, S. M. 2015. Risiko Produksi Pangan: Tantangan dan Peluang. In E. Pasandaran, (pp. 206-224). In E. Pasandaran (Ed.), Memperkuat Kemampuan Swasembada Pangan (pp. 206–224). Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development Press
Pasaribu, S. M., Lokollo, E. M., Anugrah, I. S., Agustin, N. K., Tarigan, H., Hestina, J., & Supriatna, Y. 2010. Pengembangan Asuransi Usahatani Padi untuk Menanggulangi Risiko Kerugian 75% Akibat Banjir, Kekeringan dan Hama Penyakit. Laporan Teknis Penelitian. Kerjasama Pusat Analisis Sosial Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Pertanian Dengan Kementerian Riset Dan Teknologi. Bogor
Prastiwi, W. D., Dalmiyatun, T., & Roessali, W. 2023. Farmers’ preference of agricultural insurance product’s attributes in Pati Regency. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2586(1), 050006. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0106702
Pratiwi, E. P. A., Hartono, A. O., Wijdan, H. Z., Nurrochmad, F., & Setyawan, C. 2020. Precipitation and flood impact on rice paddies: Statistics in Central Java, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 612(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/612/1/012040
Purnamayani, N. P. A., Susrusa, K. B., & Parining, N. 2022. Asuransi Usahatani Padi (AUTP) di Subak Gede Penarungan. Jurnal Agribisnis Dan Agrowisata (Journal of Agribusiness and Agritourism), 16(1), 552. https://doi.org/10.24843/JAA.2022.v11.i02.p07
Roessali, W., Mukson, M., Nurfadillah, S., & Budiraharjo, K. 2022. Farmer’s perceptions on risk and determinants of risk management strategy in integrated cattle and crops farming systems. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture, 47(2), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.14710/JITAA.47.2.146-154
Roessali, W., Nikmah, A., & Setiadi, A. 2022. Strategies For Increasing Participation in The Implementation of The AUTP Program in Kudus Regency. Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 6(2), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.14710/AGRISOCIONOMICS.V6I2.9578
Rustandi, Y., & Ismulhadi, I. 2017. Analisis Pengambilan Keputusan Keikutsertaan Petani Pada Program Asuransi Usaha Tani Padi (AUTP) di Kabupaten Malang. AGRIEKSTENSIA: Jurnal Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pertanian, 16(2), 276–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34145/agriekstensia.v16i2
Senapati, A. K. 2020. Evaluation of risk preferences and coping strategies to manage with various agricultural risks: evidence from India. Heliyon, 6(3), e03503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03503
Siregar, M. F., Alamsyah, Z., & Ningsih, R. 2022. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keikutsertaan Petani Dalam Program Asuransi Usaha Tani Padi (Autp) Di Kecamatan Tungkal Ulu Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat. Journal of Agribusiness and Local Wisdom, 5(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/jalow.v5i2.23102
Sugiyono. 2019. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. ALFABETA
Sumaryo, S., & Syarief, Y. A. 2020. Motivasi Petani Mengikuti Program Asuransi Usahatani Padi di Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. Suluh Pembangunan: Journal of Extension and Development, 2(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsp.v2i1.28
Sumastuti, E., & Pradono, N. S. 2016. Dampak Perubahan Iklim Pada Tanaman Padi di Jawa Tengah. Journal of Economic Education, 5(1), 31–38
Suratiyah, K. 2015. Ilmu Usahatani. Penebar Swadaya
Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. 1998. Cross-Cultural Differences in Risk Perception, but Cross-Cultural Similarities in Attitudes Towards Perceived Risk. Management Science, 44(9), 1205–1217. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.44.9.1205
Widyastuti, Y., Prabowo, R. N., Wibowo, B. P., Kartina, N., Rumanti, I. A., Agustiani, N., & Mulsanti, I. W. 2022. Produksi Benih Padi Hibdrida: Kemajuan, Tantangan, dan Peluang Pengembangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pertanian Vol, 41(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.21082/jp3.v41n1.2022.p12-20
Yanuarti, R., Aji, J. M. M., & Rondhi, M. 2019. Risk aversion level influence on farmer’s decision to participate in crop insurance: A review. Agricultural Economics, 65 (2019) (No. 10), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.17221/93/2019-AGRICECON
Zakirin, M., Yurisinthae, E., & Kusrini, N. 2013. Analisis Risiko Usahatani Padi Pada Lahan Pasang Surut di Kabupaten Pontianak. Jurnal Social Economic of Agriculture, 2(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.26418/J.SEA.V2I1.5122

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Starting from 2021, the author(s) whose article is published in the Agrisocionomics journal attain the copyright for their article. By submitting the manuscript to Agrisocionomics, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.

The author(s) guarantee that:

Their article is original, written by the mentioned author(s),
Has never been published before,
Does not contain statements that violate the law, and
Does not violate the rights of others, is subject to copyright held exclusively by the author(s), and is free from the rights of third parties, and that the necessary written permission to quote from other sources has been obtained by the author(s).

The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:

Copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article, such as patents,
The right to use the substance of the article in its own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for its own purposes,
The right to archive all versions of the article, and
The right to enter into separate additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of published versions of the article (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.

If the article was prepared jointly by more than one author, each author submitting the manuscript warrants that they have been given permission by all co-authors to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf, and agree to notify the co-authors of the terms of this policy. Agrisocionomics will not be held responsible for anything that may arise because of the writer's internal dispute. Agrisocionomics will only communicate with correspondence authors.

Authors should also understand that once published, their articles (and any additional files, including data sets, and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently featured on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Agrisocionomics allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Agrisocionomics to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.