skip to main content

SOCIAL CAPITAL AND FARMERS' DECISION TO CULTIVATE PULU MANDOTI EMAS (PME) LOCAL RICE: A PROBIT MODEL

*Muhammad Taufik Saputra  -  Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
Jangkung Handoyo Mulyo  -  Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
Dwijono Hadi Darwanto  -  Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2024 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Salukanan Village, Enrekang Regency, is the production center of inherited local rice through generations, known as "pulu mandoti emas" (PME). The PME local rice has a unique aroma and can exclusively grow in the village of Salukanan, Enrekang Regency. The relatively long cultivation period (six months) drives the farmers neglecting PME cultivation. However, the higher selling price of PME (in average of Rp 72,200/kg) compared to regular rice makes the consumers only purchase it when needed for traditional events (weddings ceremonies, funerals, housewarming ceremonies, etc.). It is suspected that the social capital possessed by farmers influences their motivation to continue cultivating PME. This article aims to analyze social capital (communication frequency regarding PME cultivation with external parties, social trust, institutional trust, and norms of reciprocity) other factors such as socio-economy characteristics and institutional factors that affect farmers' decisions to continue cultivating PME. The study was conducted in Salukanan Village, Enrekang Regency, by collecting data from 96 farmer respondents selected through simple random sampling. A probit model regression analysis was used and the result indicated that strengthening social capital among farmers by improving communication, trust, and reciprocity, along with leveraging their existing experience through mentoring and knowledge-sharing initiatives, can significantly encourage the continued cultivation of PME local rice. Comprehensive support through inclusive policy development, training, counseling services, and active engagement initiatives is essential for sustaining PME local rice cultivation in Salukanan Village.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: farmer decision, probit model, pulu mandoti emas, social capital

Article Metrics:

  1. Amrullah, A., Tenriawaru, A. N., Viantika, N. M., Darma, R., Heliawaty, & Akib, M. N. 2020. An added value analysis of Pulu Mandoti rice agricultural commodities at farmers level. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 486(1), 012040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/486/1/012040
  2. Anthoni, A., & Yulianto, Y. 2023. Rice commodity agribusiness development strategy in improving food security after the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia: Case study in Tulang Bawang Regency. Research, Society and Development, 12(5), e12612541642. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i5.41642
  3. Anwar, Irmayani, & Nurhaedah. 2022. Analisis Pemasaran Komoditi Unggulan Beras Beraroma “Pulu Mandoti” di Desa Salukanan Kecamatan Baraka Kabupaten Enrekang. Jurnal Ilmiah Agrotani, 4(2), 67–74
  4. ASa, Z., Wikantaria, R., Mochsen Sira, Moh., Harisaha, A., & Mufti Radja, A. 2019. Makna Filosofi Spasial Horizontal dan Vertikal Rumah Tradisional Duri Di Kabupaten Enrekang. Talenta Conference Series: Energy and Engineering (EE), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.32734/ee.v2i1.414
  5. Ashraf, S., Khan, G. A., Ali, S., Ahmed, S., & Iftikhar, M. 2015. Perceived effectiveness of information sources regarding improved practices among citrus growers in Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 52(3), 861–866
  6. Aye, G. C., & Oji, O. 2009. Effects of poverty on risk attitudes of farmers in Benue state Nigeria. CBN Economic and Financial Review, 47(1), 89–104
  7. Belay, D. 2020. Determinants of individual social capital in dairy cooperatives in West Shoa, Ethiopia. Agrekon, 59(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2020.1743728
  8. Belay, D., & Fekadu, G. 2021. Influence of social capital in adopting climate change adaptation strategies: empirical evidence from rural areas of Ambo district in Ethiopia. Climate and Development, 13(10), 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2020.1862741
  9. Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. 2016. Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach, 7th Edition (7th ed.). John Wiley and Sons
  10. BPP Kecamatan Baraka. 2023. Programa Pertanian Kecamatan Baraka 2023
  11. Bui, H. T. M., & Nguyen, H. T. T. 2021. Factors influencing farmers’ decision to convert to organic tea cultivation in the mountainous areas of northern Vietnam. Organic Agriculture, 11(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-020-00322-2
  12. Chekene, M., & Chancellor, T. 2015. Factors Affecting the Adoption of Improved Rice Varieties in Borno State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 19(2), 21. https://doi.org/10.4314/jae.v19i2.2
  13. Edwards-Jones, G. 2006. Modelling farmer decision-making: concepts, progress and challenges. Animal Science, 82(6), 783–790. https://doi.org/10.1017/ASC2006112
  14. Grootaert, C., & Bastelar, T. Van. 2002. Understanding and Measuring Social Capital (C. Grootaert & T. Van Bastelar, Eds.). The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5068-4
  15. Hasmah, H. 2020. Pulu Mandoti: Makanan Tradisional Masyarakat Di Kabupaten Enrekang. Walasuji: Jurnal Sejarah Dan Budaya, 11(1), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.36869/wjsb.v11i1.75
  16. Indaryati, S., & Adriani, D. 2023. Determining Factors of Institutional Management of Downstream Agribusiness Subsystem in Sustainable Rice Food Business Development. Migration Letters, 584–604
  17. Ismail, I., & Dyah, M. M. M. 2023. Eksplorasi Makanan Khas Tradisional di Kabupaten Enrekang. Maspul Journal Of Community Empowerment, 5(1), 1–12
  18. Karunathilaka, S. D. D. D., & Thayaparan, A. 2016. Determinants of Farmers’ Perceptions towards the Adoption of New Farming Techniques in Paddy Production in Sri Lanka. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 7(12), 37–45
  19. Kehinde, A. D., Adeyemo, R., & Ogundeji, A. A. 2021. Does social capital improve farm productivity and food security? Evidence from cocoa-based farming households in Southwestern Nigeria. Heliyon, 7(3), e06592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06592
  20. Kustiari, T., Susanto, D., Sumardjo, S., & Pulungan, I. 2006. Faktor-Faktor Penentu Tingkat Kemampuan Petani Dalam Mengelola Lahan Marjinal Kasus di Desa Karangmaja, Kecamatan Karanggayam, Kabupaten Kebumen, Jawa Tengah). Jurnal Penyuluhan, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.25015/penyuluhan.v2i1.2136
  21. Latif, J., Busthanul, N., & Amrullah, A. 2020. Motivasi Petani Dalam Budidaya Padi Pulu Mandoti. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 16(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.20956/jsep.v16i1.8353
  22. Machmuddin, N. 2023. Factors Affecting Farmers’ Decisions To Apply Hydroponic Systems In Tarakan City. Agricultural Socio-Economics Journal, 23(1), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.agrise.2023.023.1.11
  23. Manson, S. M., Jordan, N. R., Nelson, K. C., & Brummel, R. F. 2016. Modeling the effect of social networks on adoption of multifunctional agriculture. Environmental Modelling & Software, 75, 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2014.09.015
  24. Miao, S., Heijman, W., Zhu, X., & Lu, Q. 2015. Social capital influences farmer participation in collective irrigation management in Shaanxi Province, China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 7(3), 448–466. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-05-2014-0044
  25. Moghfeli, Z., Ghorbani, M., Rezvani, M. R., Khorasani, M. A., Azadi, H., & Scheffran, J. 2023. Social capital and farmers’ leadership in Iranian rural communities: application of social network analysis. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66(5), 977–1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.2008329
  26. Mundiyah, A. I., & Tahir, R. 2020. Strategy To Improve Rice Seeds Based On Social Capital In Pangkep District South Sulawesi. Agroland The Agricultural Sciences Journal (e-Journal), 6(2), 107–117
  27. Santosa, I., Muslihudin, Adawiyah, W. R., Chairiah, A., Jati, B. K. H., & Aisyah, D. D. 2022. Characteristics and Functions of Balanced Reciprocity: Towards Farmer Independence. Res Militaris, 12(5), 64–72
  28. Saqib, S. e, Ahmad, M. M., Panezai, S., & Ali, U. 2016. Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of agricultural credit as a risk management strategy: The case of Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 17, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.008
  29. Sarker, A., & Itohara, Y. 2007. Information Sources Used by the Farmers Regarding Practice of Organic Farming. Journal of Rural Problems, 43(1), 234–239. https://doi.org/10.7310/arfe1965.43.234
  30. Sarma, P. K. 2021. Adoption and impact of super granulated urea (guti urea) technology on farm productivity in Bangladesh: A Heckman two-stage model approach. Environmental Challenges, 5, 100228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100228
  31. Sinha, H. 2016. Rediscovering the traditional paddy varieties in Jharkhand: conservation priority in hybrid rice era. Journal of Rural Development, 35(2)
  32. Suhesti, E. 2023. Pengembangan Plasma Nutfah Padi Lokal Sebagai Varietas Unggul (Studi Kasus “Padi Cerece” Desa Bugeman Kecamatan Kendit). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Unars Vol. 2 No. 1
  33. Tenrisau Adam, A. M., Ilsan, M., Rasyid, R., & Faharuddin, A.-Z. 2023. Strategi Keberlanjutan Pola Nafkah Rumah Tangga Petani Padi Pulu Mandoti di Desa Salukan, Kabupaten Enrekang. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 29(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.29.1.12
  34. Thompson, L. J. 2009. A farmer-centric approach to decision-making and behaviour change: unpacking the “black-box” of decision- making theories in agriculture
  35. Treuren, G., & Anderson, K. 2010. The Employment Expectations of Different Age Cohorts: Is Generation Y Really that Different? Australian Journal of Career Development, 19(2), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/103841621001900207
  36. Uphoff, N., & Wijayaratna, C. M. 2000. Demonstrated Benefits from Social Capital: The Productivity of Farmer Organizations in Gal Oya, Sri Lanka. World Development, 28(11), 1875–1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00063-2
  37. Wolfolds, S. E., & Siegel, J. 2019. Misaccounting for endogeneity: The peril of relying on the Heckman two‐step method without a valid instrument. Strategic Management Journal, 40(3), 432–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2995
  38. Yaméogo, T., Fonta, W., & Wünscher, T. 2018. Can Social Capital influence Smallholder Farmers’ Climate-Change Adaptation Decisions? Evidence from Three Semi-Arid Communities in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Social Sciences, 7(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7030033
  39. Yoder, L., & Roy Chowdhury, R. 2018. Tracing social capital: How stakeholder group interactions shape agricultural water quality restoration in the Florida Everglades. Land Use Policy, 77, 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.038
  40. Zain, M., Ibrahim, H., & Musdalifah, M. 2022. Knowledge sharing behavior among farmers in Indonesia: Does social capital matter? African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 22(115), 21972–21989. https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.115.22615
  41. Zapata-Salas, R., Guarín, J. F., & Ríos-Osorio, L. A. 2023. Trust and reciprocity norms in the analysis of social capital related to udder health. A mixed methods approach with dairy farmers and veterinarians from the north of Antioquia. Plos One, 18(11), e0277857. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277857

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.