skip to main content

THE COMPETITIVENESS OF COMMODITIES SEAWEED USING POLICY ANALYSIS MATRIX (PAM)

*Elly Jumiati scopus  -  Agricultural Science Masters Study Program, Agriculture Faculty, Universitas Borneo Tarakan, Tarakan, North Kalimantan, Indonesia, Indonesia
Ahmad Mubarak  -  Agricultural Science Masters Study Program, Agriculture Faculty, Universitas Borneo Tarakan, Tarakan, North Kalimantan, Indonesia, Indonesia
Khalid Sunny  -  Agricultural Science Masters Study Program, Agriculture Faculty, Universitas Borneo Tarakan, Tarakan, North Kalimantan, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2024 Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Seaweed products from the city of Tarakan have been traded to outside areas such as Makassar and Surabaya before being exported overseas. This study aims to analyze the competitiveness of seaweed in Tarakan City using the policy analysis matrix (PAM) method. The PAM method is used two main indicators for measuring competitiveness, namely the Private Cost Ratio (PCR) as an indicator of competitive advantage and the Domestic Resource Cost Ratio (DRCR) which is an indicator of comparative advantage. The results showed that seaweed in Tarakan City had a PCR value of 0.37 and a DRC of 0.08, the private profit (PP) obtained was Rp 6,444,319 financially has a competitive advantage at the business level farmer. Social profit (PS) of Rp 30,386,901 economically or the economy as a whole has a comparative advantage which means efficient use of resources. The impact of government policies on the output of seaweed cultivation is not protective with an NPCO value of 0.34. The impact of government policies on seaweed cultivation inputs is not protective with an NPCI value of 1.29, meaning that farmers have not received positive incentives from the current input subsidy policy. The EPC value of 0.31 means that the overall impact of government policies on input-output is protective and provides positive incentives to farmers, but is still relatively weak and very vulnerable if policy changes occur. The regional government is expected to provide protection to seaweed cultivators in the form of setting costs for purchasing seaweed and also to strictly supervise cartel practices in the seaweed trading system.

 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: competitiveness, pam, seaweed, Tarakan

Article Metrics:

  1. BPS. 2020. Import Foreign Trade Statistics Bulletin. Jakarta: Central Bureau of Statistics. April
  2. Dwiyitno. 2011. Seaweed as a Potential Source of Food Fiber. Squalen's Journal, 6(1): 9-17
  3. Fadli, Pambudy, R. & Harianto. 2017. Analysis of Competitiveness of Seaweed Agribusiness In East Lombok District. Agribisnis Indonesia Journal, 5(2): 89-102
  4. Feryanto. 2010. Analysis of Competitiveness and Impact of Government Policy on Local Cow's Milk Commodities in West Java. Thesis. Institut Pertanian Bogor Postgraduate School
  5. Handayani, P., & Fuad Muchlis. 2020. Analysis of the Competitiveness of the Libtukom Coffee Farming Business in West Tanjung Jabung Regency. In Journal Of Agribusiness and Local Wisdom. 3(2)
  6. Haryono, D., Hartadi, R., & Murti Mulyo Aji, J. 2011. Analysis of Competitiveness and Impact of Government Policy on Cocoa Production in East Java Sosial, Ekonomi Pertanian Journal, 5(2): 72-82
  7. Kariyasa. K. 2003. Impact of Import Tariffs and Performance of Indonesian Rice Basic Ilarga Policy in World Market. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian Journal, 1(4): 315-330
  8. Mahatama E., & Farid M. 2013. Competitiveness and marketing channels of seaweed: the case of Jeneponto Regency, South Sulawesi. Trade Research and Development Scientific Bulletin, 7(1): 64-72
  9. Mallu, M. H., Darwanto, D. H., Hartono, S., & Handoyo Mulyo, J. 2018. The Competitiveness of Beef Cattle Breeding Business on Community Livestock-Based in North Penajam Paser Regency, East Kalimantan Province. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 07(05): 5–8. https://doi.org/10.4172/2162-6359.1000548
  10. Marine and Fisheries Ministry. 2015. Potential and Volume of Indonesian Seaweed Production 2014. Jakarta: KKP
  11. Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. 2020. Government Report on the Implementation of the Semester State Budget Fiscal Year 2020. Jakarta
  12. Monke, E.A. & S.R. Pearson. 1995. The Policy Analysis Matrix for Agricultural Development. Cornell University Press. Ithaca and London. Revised Edition 2005. Jakarta: Publisher. Indonesian Torch Foundation
  13. Putri, T. W. S., Suryantini, A., & Utami, A. W. 2019. The Competitiveness of Stevia rebaudiana as A Sweetener Alternative in Tawangmangu Subdistrict of Karanganyar Regency. Agro Ekonomi, 20(10): 10–20. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.22146/ae.46979
  14. Radiarta, I. N., Erlania, Haryadi J., & Rosdiana A.. 2016. Analysis of the development of seaweed cultivation on Sebatik Island, Nunukan Regency, North Kalimantan. Kebijakan Perikanan Indoneia Journal, 8(1): 29-40
  15. Rahmaniyah, F., & Rum M. 2020. Competitiveness Analysis Of MH-3 Madura Superior Hybrid Corn in Bangkalan. Agriscience Journal, 1(2): 367-382. http://journal.trunojoyo.ac.id/agriscience
  16. Yusriadin, Budiyanto, Rosmawaty, & I. Fausayana. 2019. Competitiveness Analysis of Seaweed Farming in Konawe Selatan Regency. Jurnal Sosio Agribisnis (JSA), 4(2): 41-50

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.