FARMER SATISFACTION WITH THE FARMER CARD PROGRAM  IN KENDAL REGENCY, CENTRAL JAVA

Mukson Mukson; Titik Ekowati; Edy Prasetyo; Migie Handayani

doi:10.14710/agrisocionomics.v8i2.18136

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/agrisocionomics.v8i2.18136

FARMER SATISFACTION WITH THE FARMER CARD PROGRAM IN KENDAL REGENCY, CENTRAL JAVA

Mukson Mukson - Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, Indonesia

Titik Ekowati - Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, Indonesia

Edy Prasetyo - Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, Indonesia

*Migie Handayani - Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{Agrisocionomics18136,
    author = {Mukson Mukson and Titik Ekowati and Edy Prasetyo and Migie Handayani},
    title = {FARMER SATISFACTION WITH THE FARMER CARD PROGRAM  IN KENDAL REGENCY, CENTRAL JAVA},
    journal = {Agrisocionomics: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian},
  volume = {8},
    number = {2},
    year = {2024},
    keywords = {satisfaction, farmer card, fertilizer subsidy},
    abstract = { The subsidized fertilizer distribution program through farmer card (Kartu Tani), initiated since 2016, requires evaluation and improvement in its implementation. The use of subsidized fertilizers must be precise in its dose and timing in order to increase productivity.  The purpose of this study is to analyze the level of satisfaction of farmers with the farmer cardprogram related to subsidized fertilizers. This research employs the survey method. The location was determined by purposive sampling with five urban villages based on the number of distributed cards and each of them represents three regions; lowlands, midlands, and uplands. The respondents to this study were 100 people; 20 people from each urban village were selected using the random sampling method.   The data were taken using the interview method based on questionnaires distributed to farmers. The collected data was then analyzed using the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) and Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) methods. The results showed that most of the farmers who received the card in Kendal Regency were predominantly male, had high school education, and with an average land ownership of 0.5-1.0 hectares. The IPA analysis showed that in quadrant I (8 attributes need improvement), quadrant II (there are 16 achievement attributes that need to be maintained), quadrant III (11 low priority attributes) and quadrant IV (7 redundant attributes). Farmers' satisfaction with the farmer card program is at 71.69%, which is in the range of 61%-80.99%. In other words, the farmers are satisfied with the farmer ard services provided by the government. },
   issn = {2621-9778},   pages = {363--378}  doi = {10.14710/agrisocionomics.v8i2.18136},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/agrisocionomics/article/view/18136}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

The subsidized fertilizer distribution program through farmer card (Kartu Tani), initiated since 2016, requires evaluation and improvement in its implementation. The use of subsidized fertilizers must be precise in its dose and timing in order to increase productivity. The purpose of this study is to analyze the level of satisfaction of farmers with the farmer cardprogram related to subsidized fertilizers. This research employs the survey method. The location was determined by purposive sampling with five urban villages based on the number of distributed cards and each of them represents three regions; lowlands, midlands, and uplands. The respondents to this study were 100 people; 20 people from each urban village were selected using the random sampling method. The data were taken using the interview method based on questionnaires distributed to farmers. The collected data was then analyzed using the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) and Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) methods. The results showed that most of the farmers who received the card in Kendal Regency were predominantly male, had high school education, and with an average land ownership of 0.5-1.0 hectares. The IPA analysis showed that in quadrant I (8 attributes need improvement), quadrant II (there are 16 achievement attributes that need to be maintained), quadrant III (11 low priority attributes) and quadrant IV (7 redundant attributes). Farmers' satisfaction with the farmer card program is at 71.69%, which is in the range of 61%-80.99%. In other words, the farmers are satisfied with the farmer ard services provided by the government.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: satisfaction, farmer card, fertilizer subsidy

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 8, No 2 (2024): June 2024

Recent articles

THE IMPACT OF RESIDENTS ATTITUDE TOWARD SUSTAINABLE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT USING SUS-TAS: MEDIATING ROLE OF TOURISM INVOLVEMENT THE INFLUENCE OF BRAND IMAGE AND BRAND TRUST ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF FERTILIZER ON FARMERS IN BANTUL REGENCY TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF SHALLOT PRODUCTION IN PRODUCTION CENTERS IN JAVA AND OUTSIDE JAVA More recent articles

Alam, A. S., & Oktavianti, N. 2020. Tingkat kepuasan petani terhadap kinerja penyuluh lapangan (Studi kasus di Desa Sukasari Kecamatan Cilaku Kabupaten Cianjur). Jurnal Agrita, 2(1) : 32-45
Ashari, M. L. & D. Hariani. 2019. Analisis efektivitas program kartu tani di Kecamatan Banjarnegara Kabupaten Banjarnegara. Journal of Public Policy and Management Review, 8(2): 574-594
Astuti, H. J. 2007. Analisis Kepuasan Konsumen (Servqual Model dan Important Performance Analysis Model). Jurnal Media Ekonomi, 7(1): 1-20
Jorgi, R. S., S. Gayatri, & T. Dalmiyatun. 2019. Hubungan tingkat pengetahuan petani dengan efektivitas pelaksanaan program kartu tani di Kabupaten Semarang. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research, 5(2): 88-98
Latu, T. M. & Everett, A.M., 2000. Review of Satisfaction Research and Measurement Approaches, Departement of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand
Minarni, E. & A. Nurhadi. 2016. Analisis tingkat kepuasan pelanggan terhadap pelayanan Pasar Tradisional Besuki Tulungagung. J. Benefit, 3(1): 45-58
Moko, K. W., Suwarto, S., & Utami, B. W. 2018. Perbedaan Persepsi Petani Terhadap Program Kartu Tani Di Kecamatan Kalijambe Kabupaten Sragen. Caraka Tani: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 32(1): 9-13
Mufidah, N & I. Prabawati. 2018. Implementasi program penyaluran pupuk bersubsidi melalui kartu tani di Desa Durung Bedug Kecamatan Candi Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Publika Jurnal Ilmu Adminitrasi Negara, 6(9)
Norfahmi, F., N. Kusnadi, R. Nurmalina, & R. Winandi. 2017. Analisis curahan kerja rumah tangga petani pada usahatani padi dan dampaknya terhadap pendapatan keluarga. J. Informatika Pertanian, 26(1): 13 – 22
Prasekti, Y. H. 2017. Peran wanita tani dalam menunjang perekonomian rumah tangga keluarga petani. J. Agribis, 13(15): 1-16
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Bisnis (pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta
Umam, R. K. & N. P. Hariastuti. 2018. Analisa kepuasan pelanggan dengan menggunakan metode Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) dan Importance Performance Analysis (IPA). Seminar Nasional Sains dan Teknologi Terapan: 339-344
Yuliana, A. & H. J. Nadapdap. 2020. Faktor yang memengaruhi keputusan adopsi petani terhadap kartu tani di Eks-Karesidenan Surakarta. J. Pertanian Agros, 22(2): 94-104

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Starting from 2021, the author(s) whose article is published in the Agrisocionomics journal attain the copyright for their article. By submitting the manuscript to Agrisocionomics, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.

The author(s) guarantee that:

Their article is original, written by the mentioned author(s),
Has never been published before,
Does not contain statements that violate the law, and
Does not violate the rights of others, is subject to copyright held exclusively by the author(s), and is free from the rights of third parties, and that the necessary written permission to quote from other sources has been obtained by the author(s).

The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:

Copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article, such as patents,
The right to use the substance of the article in its own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for its own purposes,
The right to archive all versions of the article, and
The right to enter into separate additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of published versions of the article (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.

If the article was prepared jointly by more than one author, each author submitting the manuscript warrants that they have been given permission by all co-authors to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf, and agree to notify the co-authors of the terms of this policy. Agrisocionomics will not be held responsible for anything that may arise because of the writer's internal dispute. Agrisocionomics will only communicate with correspondence authors.

Authors should also understand that once published, their articles (and any additional files, including data sets, and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently featured on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Agrisocionomics allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Agrisocionomics to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.