IDENTIFIKASI INDEKS KENYAMANAN  KOTA YOGYAKARTA BERDASARKAN KRITERIA CULTURAL HERITAGE

Ayu Candra Kurniati; Fahril Fanani

doi:10.14710/tataloka.21.4.634-648

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.21.4.634-648

IDENTIFIKASI INDEKS KENYAMANAN KOTA YOGYAKARTA BERDASARKAN KRITERIA CULTURAL HERITAGE

*Ayu Candra Kurniati

- Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Nasional (STTNAS) Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Fahril Fanani - Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Nasional (STTNAS) Yogyakarta, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{tataloka3336,
    author = {Ayu Kurniati and Fahril Fanani},
    title = {IDENTIFIKASI INDEKS KENYAMANAN  KOTA YOGYAKARTA BERDASARKAN KRITERIA CULTURAL HERITAGE},
    journal = {TATALOKA},
  volume = {21},
    number = {4},
    year = {2019},
    keywords = {livable index; cultural heritage building; city identity},
    abstract = { The ideal city planning, in fact is the combination between livable and sustainable city, where the city is able to maintain the quality of life in the present as well as the future, furthermore it generates a comfortable atmosphere for a place to live as seen from many aspects.  Yogyakarta is one of the livable cities in Indonesia with the highest index score, 68.14% for social life and 70.89% for the preservation of cultural heritage building. Considering the mission of Yogyakarta which is to enhance cultural quality and strengthen morality, behavior and cultural value of the community, it is considerable to conduct a research regarding to livable city index in Yogyakarta based on the criteria of cultural heritage.   Furthermore, this research used scoring dichotomy data as a methodology with variables: the changes in building's form and function, the ownership status and the usage of cultural heritage building, as well as the amount of cultural heritage buildings that have been demolished and/or in the process of demolition. The results show the highest livable index for preservation of cultural heritage building is in cultural preservation area Kotagede (41.77%), followed by Kraton (20.66%), Malioboro (14.06%), Pakualaman (13.21%) and the least is Kotabaru (10.03%). Kotagede has the highest livable index due to the amount of cultural heritage building compared to other preservation areas. From the total percentage, 42.9% of the buildings are in the original form, 30% have its function changed, 70% are in personal ownership, 21.6% are in group/association, and 45.5% are not demolished. The conclusion of this study is that the existence of cultural heritage building in the city will increase the value of environmental identity which is resembles the character of the area and the community within },
   issn = {2356-0266},   pages = {634--648}  doi = {10.14710/tataloka.21.4.634-648},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/tataloka/article/view/3336}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

The ideal city planning, in fact is the combination between livable and sustainable city, where the city is able to maintain the quality of life in the present as well as the future, furthermore it generates a comfortable atmosphere for a place to live as seen from many aspects. Yogyakarta is one of the livable cities in Indonesia with the highest index score, 68.14% for social life and 70.89% for the preservation of cultural heritage building. Considering the mission of Yogyakarta which is to enhance cultural quality and strengthen morality, behavior and cultural value of the community, it is considerable to conduct a research regarding to livable city index in Yogyakarta based on the criteria of cultural heritage. Furthermore, this research used scoring dichotomy data as a methodology with variables: the changes in building's form and function, the ownership status and the usage of cultural heritage building, as well as the amount of cultural heritage buildings that have been demolished and/or in the process of demolition. The results show the highest livable index for preservation of cultural heritage building is in cultural preservation area Kotagede (41.77%), followed by Kraton (20.66%), Malioboro (14.06%), Pakualaman (13.21%) and the least is Kotabaru (10.03%). Kotagede has the highest livable index due to the amount of cultural heritage building compared to other preservation areas. From the total percentage, 42.9% of the buildings are in the original form, 30% have its function changed, 70% are in personal ownership, 21.6% are in group/association, and 45.5% are not demolished. The conclusion of this study is that the existence of cultural heritage building in the city will increase the value of environmental identity which is resembles the character of the area and the community within

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: livable index; cultural heritage building; city identity

Funding: Kementerian Riset, Teknologi dan Perguruan Tinggi

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 21, No 4 (2019): Volume 21 No 4, November 2019

Recent articles

IDENTIFIKASI INDEKS KENYAMANAN KOTA YOGYAKARTA BERDASARKAN KRITERIA CULTURAL HERITAGE ANALISIS SPASIAL KEMISKINAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION: STUDI KASUS KABUPATEN PANDEGLANG DAN LEBAK LIVELIHOOD MASYARAKAT KAMPUNG PELANGI, GUNUNG BRINTIK, KOTA SEMARANG MELALUI PENDEKATAN SUSTAINABLE URBAN LIVELIHOOD (SUL) STUDY OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOPMENT OF NGADAS TRADITIONAL TOURISM VILLAGE IN PONCOKUSUMO DISTRICT, MALANG REGENCY THE MULTI-LAYERED IDENTITY OF A CITY: ARTICULATING CITIZENS’ AND PLACE IDENTITIES IN YOGYAKARTA AS THE CITY OF PHILOSOPHY THE INFLUENCE OF THE TRADITIONAL MARKET IMAGE ON THE SUCCESS OF SOLO CITY BRANDING Back matter Front matter More recent articles

Bell, Karen. 2000. Urban Amenity Indicators: The Livability of Our Urban Environments. Ministry for the Environment of Auckland City
Darise D.I, Tondobala L, Gosal P.H.2015. Kajian Kota Manado sebagai Kota Layak Huni berdasarkan Kriteria (IAP) Ikatan Ahli Perencanaan. [Skripsi]: Universitas Sam Ratulangi. 1(1): 131-140
Dinas Perizinan dan Penanaman Modal DIY, 2018
Hadiyanta Ign, Eka. 2015. Kawasan Cagar Budaya di Yogyakarta: Citra, Identitas, dan Branding Ruang. Yogyakarta: Jurnal Widya Prabha. Vol. 04/ IV/ 2015
Ikatan Ahli Perencanaan (IAP). 2016. The Most Liveable City in Indonesia. https://issuu.com/iapindonesia/docs/mlci_2014_presentasi_compatibility. Diakses pada 03 Juni 2017
Marbun J. 2012. Pelestarian Benda dan Bangunan Cagar Budaya di Yogyakarta. https://joemarbun.wordpress.com/permasalahan-kawasan-cagar-budaya. Diakses pada 28 April 2018
Muttaqin D. 2010. Most Livable City Index, Tantangan Menuju Kota Layak Huni. Bulletin Tata Ruang Edisi Januari-Februari 2010. ISSN: 1978-1571. Jakarta: Badan Koordinasi Penataan Ruang Nasional
Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta. 2017. Visi dan misi Kota Yogyakarta. Diakses pada 28 Agustus 2018 dari https://jogjaprov.go.id/profil/4-visi-misi-tujuan-dan-sasaran
Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta No 10 Tahun 2012 tentang Pelestarian Warisan Budaya dan Cagar Budaya. Yogyakarta
Peraturan Gubernur Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Nomor 62 Tahun 2013 tentang Pelestarian Cagar Budaya. (2013)
Sujarweni, Wiranta. 2015. SPPS untuk Penelitian. Pustaka Baru Press. Yogyakarta
Tan, Thye, et all. 2014. A New Approach to Measuring the Liveability of Cities: the Global Liveable Cities Index. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development. Vol 11, No.2, 2014
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1992, tentang Benda dan Bangunan Cagar Budaya
Wahyudi D. 2012. Kepemilikan Benda Cagar Budaya (Antara Kewajiban dan Hak). http://pusakanuswantara.blogspot.com/2012/10/kepemilikan-benda-cagar-budaya-antara.html. Diakses 27 Mei 2018
Wheleer, Stephen. 2004. The Sustainable Urban Development Reader. Psychological Press. New York
Widyanto, Andreas Haryo. 2016. Perizinan pemanfaatan bangunan cagar budaya untuk bisnis waralaba London Beauty Center (LBC) di Kota Yogyakarta. Diakses pada 27 Agustus 2018 dari http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/id/eprint/11582
Wirastari, Amanda & Suprihardjo, Rimadewi. 2012. Pelestarian keawasan cagar budaya berbasis partisipasi masyarakat (studi kasus: kawasan cagar budaya Bubutan, Surabaya). Jurnal teknik ITS, 1(1), 63-67

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

As an article writer, the author has the right to use their articles for various purposes, including use by institutions that employ authors or institutions that provide funding for research. Author rights are granted without special permission.

Author who publishes a paper at Tataloka has the broad right to use their work for teaching and scientific purposes without the need to ask permission, including: used for (i) teaching in the author's class or institution, (ii) presentation at meetings or conferences and distributing copies to participants ; (iii) training conducted by the author or author's institution; (iv) distribution to colleagues for research use; (v) use in the compilation of subsequent authors' works; (vi) inclusion in a thesis or dissertation; (vi) reuse of part of the article in another work (with citation); (vii) preparation of derivative works (with citation); (viii) voluntary posting on open websites operated by authors or author institutions for scientific purposes.

Authors and readers can copy and redistribute material in any media or format, and mix, modify, and build material for any purpose but they must provide appropriate credit (provide article citation or content), providing links to the license, and indicate if there are changes.

The authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Tataloka . Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.

Reproduce any part of this journal, its storage in the database or its transmission by all forms or media is permitted does not need for written permission from Tataloka . However, it should be cited as an honor in academic manners

Tataloka and the Department of Urban and Regional Planning of Diponegoro University and the Editor make every effort to ensure that there are no data, opinions, or false or misleading statements published in Tataloka. However, the content of the article is the sole and exclusive responsibility of each author.

The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form - Indonesian] [Copyright Transfer Form - English]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editor in the form of printed letters, scanned documents sent via email or fax.