LIVELIHOOD MASYARAKAT KAMPUNG PELANGI, GUNUNG BRINTIK, KOTA SEMARANG MELALUI PENDEKATAN SUSTAINABLE URBAN LIVELIHOOD (SUL)

Tia Adelia Suryani; Haryo Winarso

doi:10.14710/tataloka.21.4.678-688

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.21.4.678-688

LIVELIHOOD MASYARAKAT KAMPUNG PELANGI, GUNUNG BRINTIK, KOTA SEMARANG MELALUI PENDEKATAN SUSTAINABLE URBAN LIVELIHOOD (SUL)

*Tia Adelia Suryani - Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung, Indonesia

Haryo Winarso

- Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia

Citation Format:

Abstract

The rapid growth of the population of Semarang City and the limited land for settlements resulted in the emergence of illegal slums. One of the government's efforts to revitalize the slum area by coloring Gunung Brintik village area which became known as Kampung Pelangi. Some slum revitalization programs in other countries have not succeeded in increasing residents’ livelihood. The purpose of this study was to examine the success of the government in improving the livelihood of Kampung Pelangi in Semarang City, through the Sustainable Urban Livelihood (SUL) approach with quantitative descriptive methods and scoring analysis techniques. The study was conducted at two different times; before the implementation of the Semarang City Government program (in 2016) and after the implementation (in 2018). As a control, Kampung Pandean was chosen because it had similar conditions but did not get any program from the government. The results showed that there was a change in the livelihood of the population in Kampung Pelangi include the quality of human capital, natural capital, social capital, and physical capital, while the condition of Kampung Pandean does not show any changes during 2016-2018. This change is not due to coloring but due to improvements in physical conditions.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: kampung; revitalization; slums; urban livelihood.

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 21, No 4 (2019): Volume 21 No 4, November 2019

Recent articles

ANALISIS SPASIAL KEMISKINAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION: STUDI KASUS KABUPATEN PANDEGLANG DAN LEBAK HUBUNGAN SPASIAL TRANSAKSI TANAH DENGAN PERKEMBANGAN WILAYAH DI KABUPATEN CIREBON, JAWA BARAT KESESUAIAN LOKASI PENGEMBANGAN KAWASAN INDUSTRI DI KABUPATEN BELITUNG THE MULTI-LAYERED IDENTITY OF A CITY: ARTICULATING CITIZENS’ AND PLACE IDENTITIES IN YOGYAKARTA AS THE CITY OF PHILOSOPHY STUDY OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOPMENT OF NGADAS TRADITIONAL TOURISM VILLAGE IN PONCOKUSUMO DISTRICT, MALANG REGENCY SUSTAINABILITY LEVEL OF DENSELY POPULATED AREA: JATIMULYO URBAN COMMUNITIES, LOWOKWARU DISTRICT, MALANG CITY Front matter Back matter More recent articles

Archer, D. (2012). Baan Mankong participatory slum upgrading in Bangkok, Thailand: Community perceptions of outcomes and security of tenure. Habitat International, 36(1), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.08.006
Ashley, C., & Carney, D. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods: Lessons from early experience. Development, 64
Balchin, P. N. (1979). Housing Improvement and Social Inequality: Case Study of an Inner City. Saxon House
Balee, G. J., & Jruek, K. (2006). Kajian penghidupan berkelanjutan, (497)
Calderon, C. (2012). Social Urbanism: Participatory urban upgrading in Medelin, Colombia. Requalifying the Built Environment: Challenges and Responses, 179–198
Chambers, R., & Conway, G. R. (1991). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. Ids Discussion Paper, 296(Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex), 29. https://doi.org/ISBN 0 903715 58 9
de Sherbinin, A., VanWey, L. K., McSweeney, K., Aggarwal, R., Barbieri, A., Henry, S., … Walker, R. (2008). Rural household demographics, livelihoods and the environment. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.005
Dianingrum, A., Faqih, M., & Septanti, D. (2017). Development of Kampung Improvement Program in Surabaya, Indonesia. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 6(7), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.9790/1813-0607014147
Erman, T. (2016). Formalization by the State, Re-Informalization by the People: A Gecekondu Transformation Housing Estate as Site of Multiple Discrepancies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(2), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12349
Fang, Y. P., Fan, J., Shen, M. Y., & Song, M. Q. (2014). Sensitivity of livelihood strategy to livelihood capital in mountain areas: Empirical analysis based on different settlements in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River, China. Ecological Indicators, 38, 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.007
Farrington, J., Ramasut, T., & Walker, J. (2002). Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches in Urban Areas: General Lessons, with Illustrations from Indian Cases. London
Ikatan Ahli Perencanaan Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya. (1998). Kamus Tata Ruang. Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya, Departemen Pekerjaan Umum bekerjasama dengan Ikatan Ahli Perencanaan Indonesia
Khalifa, M. A. (2015). Evolution of informal settlements upgrading strategies in Egypt: From negligence to participatory development. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 6(4), 1151–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2015.04.008
Liu, X., Han, S. S., & O’Connor, K. (2013). Art villages in metropolitan Beijing: A study of the location dynamics. Habitat International, 40, 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.04.005
Liu, Z., & Liu, L. (2016). Characteristics and driving factors of rural livelihood transition in the east coastal region of China: A case study of suburban Shanghai. Journal of Rural Studies, 43, 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.008
McGee, T. G. (1996). On the utility of dualism: the informal sector and mega - urbanization in developing countries. Regional Development Dialogue, 17(1), 1–15
Meikle, S., Ramasut, T., & Walker, J. (2001). Sustainable Urban Livelihoods: Concepts and Implications for Policy Sustainable Urban Livelihoods: Concepts and Implications for Policy Sustainable Urban Livelihoods: Concepts and Implications for Policy. Development, 33(112), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290610660643
Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 02 Tahun 2016 tentang Kualitas Terhadap Perumahan Kumuh dan Permukiman Kumuh. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum Dan Perumahan Rakyat,. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum Dan Perumahan Rakyat, 1–36
Nas, P. J. M. (Ed.). (1986). The Indonesian City: Studies in Urban Development and Planning. Dordrecht: Dordrecht, Holland ; Cinnaminson, N.J. : Foris Publications
Patel, K. (2013). A successful slum upgrade in Durban: A case of formal change andinformal continuity. Habitat International, 40, 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.05.005
Pemerintah Kota Semarang. (2014). Lampiran Keputusan Wali Kota Semarang Nomor 050/801/2014 Tentang Penetapan Lokasi lingkungan Perumahan dan Permukiman Kumuh Kota Semarang
Saragih, S., J. L. dan A. R. (2007). Kerangka Penghidupan Berkelanjutan Sustainable Livelihood Framework
Turner, J. C. (1968). Housing Priorities, Settlement Patterns, and Urban Development in Modernizing Countries. Journal of the American Planning Association, 34(6), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366808977562
Undang Undang No.1. (2011). Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 tentang Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman. Republik Indonesia, 136

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

As an article writer, the author has the right to use their articles for various purposes, including use by institutions that employ authors or institutions that provide funding for research. Author rights are granted without special permission.

Author who publishes a paper at Tataloka has the broad right to use their work for teaching and scientific purposes without the need to ask permission, including: used for (i) teaching in the author's class or institution; (ii) presentation at meetings or conferences and distributing copies to participants; (iii) training conducted by the author or author's institution; (iv) distribution to colleagues for research use; (v) use in the compilation of subsequent authors' works; (vi) inclusion in a thesis or dissertation; (vi) reuse of part of the article in another work (with citation); (vii) preparation of derivative works (with citation); (viii) voluntary posting on open websites operated by authors or author institutions for scientific purposes.

Authors and readers can copy and redistribute material in any media or format, and mix, modify, and build material for any purpose but they must provide appropriate credit (provide article citation or content), providing links to the license, and indicate if there are changes.

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, non-exclusive right for publishing (publishing right) of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Publisher of Universitas Diponegoro Publishing Group.

Reproduce any part of this journal, its storage in the database or its transmission by all forms or media is permitted does not need for written permission from Tataloka . However, it should be cited as an honor in academic manners

Tataloka and the Department of Urban and Regional Planning of Diponegoro University and the Editor make every effort to ensure that there are no data, opinions, or false or misleading statements published in Tataloka. However, the content of the article is the sole and exclusive responsibility of each author.