LIVELIHOOD MASYARAKAT KAMPUNG PELANGI, GUNUNG BRINTIK, KOTA SEMARANG MELALUI PENDEKATAN SUSTAINABLE URBAN LIVELIHOOD (SUL)

*Tia Adelia Suryani  -  Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Haryo Winarso scopus  -  Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Received: 1 Sep 2018; Published: 29 Nov 2019.
Open Access
Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: EN
In Vol 21, No 4 (2019): Volume 21 No 4, November 2019 (on progress)
Statistics: 60

Abstract

The rapid growth of the population of Semarang City and the limited land for settlements resulted in the emergence of illegal slums. One of the government's efforts to revitalize the slum area by coloring Gunung Brintik village area which became known as Kampung Pelangi. Some slum revitalization programs in other countries have not succeeded in increasing residents’ livelihood. The purpose of this study was to examine the success of the government in improving the livelihood of Kampung Pelangi in Semarang City, through the Sustainable Urban Livelihood (SUL) approach with quantitative descriptive methods and scoring analysis techniques. The study was conducted at two different times; before the implementation of the Semarang City Government program (in 2016) and after the implementation (in 2018). As a control, Kampung Pandean was chosen because it had similar conditions but did not get any program from the government. The results showed that there was a change in the livelihood of the population in Kampung Pelangi include the quality of human capital, natural capital, social capital, and physical capital, while the condition of Kampung Pandean does not show any changes during 2016-2018. This change is not due to coloring but due to improvements in physical conditions.

 

Keywords
kampung; revitalization; slums; urban livelihood.

Article Metrics:

  1. Archer, D. (2012). Baan Mankong participatory slum upgrading in Bangkok, Thailand: Community perceptions of outcomes and security of tenure. Habitat International, 36(1), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.08.006
  2. Ashley, C., & Carney, D. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods: Lessons from early experience. Development, 64.
  3. Balchin, P. N. (1979). Housing Improvement and Social Inequality: Case Study of an Inner City. Saxon House.
  4. Balee, G. J., & Jruek, K. (2006). Kajian penghidupan berkelanjutan, (497).
  5. Calderon, C. (2012). Social Urbanism: Participatory urban upgrading in Medelin, Colombia. Requalifying the Built Environment: Challenges and Responses, 179–198.
  6. Chambers, R., & Conway, G. R. (1991). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. Ids Discussion Paper, 296(Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex), 29. https://doi.org/ISBN 0 903715 58 9
  7. de Sherbinin, A., VanWey, L. K., McSweeney, K., Aggarwal, R., Barbieri, A., Henry, S., … Walker, R. (2008). Rural household demographics, livelihoods and the environment. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.005
  8. Dianingrum, A., Faqih, M., & Septanti, D. (2017). Development of Kampung Improvement Program in Surabaya, Indonesia. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 6(7), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.9790/1813-0607014147
  9. Erman, T. (2016). Formalization by the State, Re-Informalization by the People: A Gecekondu Transformation Housing Estate as Site of Multiple Discrepancies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(2), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12349
  10. Fang, Y. P., Fan, J., Shen, M. Y., & Song, M. Q. (2014). Sensitivity of livelihood strategy to livelihood capital in mountain areas: Empirical analysis based on different settlements in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River, China. Ecological Indicators, 38, 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.007
  11. FAO. (2008). Socio-Economic & Livelihood Analysis in Investment Planning ©.
  12. Farrington, J., Ramasut, T., & Walker, J. (2002). Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches in Urban Areas: General Lessons, with Illustrations from Indian Cases. London.
  13. Ikatan Ahli Perencanaan Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya. (1998). Kamus Tata Ruang. Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya, Departemen Pekerjaan Umum bekerjasama dengan Ikatan Ahli Perencanaan Indonesia.
  14. Khalifa, M. A. (2015). Evolution of informal settlements upgrading strategies in Egypt: From negligence to participatory development. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 6(4), 1151–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2015.04.008
  15. Liu, X., Han, S. S., & O’Connor, K. (2013). Art villages in metropolitan Beijing: A study of the location dynamics. Habitat International, 40, 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.04.005
  16. Liu, Z., & Liu, L. (2016). Characteristics and driving factors of rural livelihood transition in the east coastal region of China: A case study of suburban Shanghai. Journal of Rural Studies, 43, 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.008
  17. McGee, T. G. (1996). On the utility of dualism: the informal sector and mega - urbanization in developing countries. Regional Development Dialogue, 17(1), 1–15.
  18. Meikle, S., Ramasut, T., & Walker, J. (2001). Sustainable Urban Livelihoods: Concepts and Implications for Policy Sustainable Urban Livelihoods: Concepts and Implications for Policy Sustainable Urban Livelihoods: Concepts and Implications for Policy. Development, 33(112), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290610660643
  19. Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 02 Tahun 2016 tentang Kualitas Terhadap Perumahan Kumuh dan Permukiman Kumuh. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum Dan Perumahan Rakyat,. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum Dan Perumahan Rakyat, 1–36.
  20. Nas, P. J. M. (Ed.). (1986). The Indonesian City: Studies in Urban Development and Planning. Dordrecht: Dordrecht, Holland ; Cinnaminson, N.J. : Foris Publications.
  21. Patel, K. (2013). A successful slum upgrade in Durban: A case of formal change andinformal continuity. Habitat International, 40, 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.05.005
  22. Pemerintah Kota Semarang. (2014). Lampiran Keputusan Wali Kota Semarang Nomor 050/801/2014 Tentang Penetapan Lokasi lingkungan Perumahan dan Permukiman Kumuh Kota Semarang.
  23. Saragih, S., J. L. dan A. R. (2007). Kerangka Penghidupan Berkelanjutan Sustainable Livelihood Framework.
  24. Turner, J. C. (1968). Housing Priorities, Settlement Patterns, and Urban Development in Modernizing Countries. Journal of the American Planning Association, 34(6), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366808977562
  25. Undang Undang No.1. (2011). Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 tentang Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman. Republik Indonesia, 136.

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to TATALOKA, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University as publisher of the journal.

In consideration for publication of your work, if published on behalf of the TATALOKA, the author agrees to transfer the work to the TATALOKA, including full and exclusive rights to publication in all media now known or later developed, including but not limited to electronic databases.