skip to main content


*Edi Purwanto  -  Jurusan Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
A Djunaedi  -  Jurusan Arsitektur dan Perencanaan, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
S Sudaryono  -  Jurusan Arsitektur dan Perencanaan, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
B.Hari Wibisono  -  Jurusan Arsitektur dan Perencanaan, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Corridor of Malioboro Street has the potential to spatial utilization conflict. Spatial agents think and attempt to build a strategy in order to remain and be able to utilize spaces for activities, but by reducing risks of conflicts as minimum as possible. The question is how is the strategy to manage spatial utilization conflict that they build together? This research applied the approach of phenomenology naturalistic, the research finding shows that the spatial consensus concept built in spatial utilization. The spatial consensus built based on compromises and negotiation has been built in a long period of time. The agreement based on their own initiatives, the representative system was through the community and association boards, and using the third party as facilitator. The substance contained in spatial consensus concept is building the communication to deal with the utilization of space collectively and in the same or different period of time by still prioritizing the principle of togetherness, tolerance, and mutual understanding not to harm others and then called as local values used as the norms and institution to agree with collectively.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: managing conflict, spatial compromise and negotiation, local values

Article Metrics:

  1. Aunurrohman, C., 2007, Malioboro: Soal Pembangunan Kawasan Pejalan Kaki dan Dusta-Dusta Proyek di Sana, Pustaka Pelajar
  2. Bell, P.A., 2001, Environmental Psychology, Harcourt Brace College Publisher, Forth Worth
  3. Bounds, M.l, 2004, Urban Social Theory : City, Self, and Society, Oxford Press
  4. Fukuyama, F., 2000. Social Capital and Civil Society. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, WP/00/74, 1-8. In Elinor Ostrom and T.K. Ahn. 2003. Foundation of Social Capital. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited
  5. Habraken, N.J., 1998, The Structure of the Ordinary : Form and Control in the Built Environment, MIT Press
  6. Hoban, T.J., 2004, Managing Conflict, A Guide for Watershed Partnership, dalam, diakses tanggal 6 Agustus 2006
  7. Ikaputra, 2004, Towards Open and Accessible Public Places in International Seminar Proceedings Managing Conflicts in Public Places Through Urban Design, March 2004, Master Program in Urban Design, Postgraduate Program, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta
  8. Lingern, H.G., 1996, Managing Conflicts Successfully, dalam family/heg.181.htm, diakses tanggal 6 Agustus 2006
  9. Prijosaksono, A. dan Sembel, R., 2002, Negosiasi, dalam 04/4/man01.html, diakses tanggal 6 Agustus 2006
  10. Purwanto, Edi, 2007, Rukun Kota: Ruang Perkotaan Berbasis Budaya Guyub, Penelitian Disertasi Program S3 Arsitektur UGM (tidak dipublikasikan)
  11. Purwanto, Edi, 2008, Social Capital in Urban Spaces -Learning from Malioboro Jogjakarta, International Symposium: Architecute, Development, and Urbanization, May 2008, University of Trikarya, Medan
  12. Sudaryono, dkk, 2004, Final Report : Karakter Ruang Lokal sebagai Sistem Mainstream Perencanaan Pembangunan Lokal, dalam : Riset Unggulan Terpadu Bidang Kemasyarakatan dan kemanusiaan (RUKK III)
  13. Wiggins., J.A., 1994, Social Psychology, Fifth Edition, 1994, McGraw-Hill, Inc

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-12-01 02:13:08

No citation recorded.