ANALYZING THE SMOOTH AND STRIATED SPACE IN PASAR CIPUTAT TANGERANG SELATAN

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.20.3.331-343

Article Metrics: (Click on the Metric tab below to see the detail)

Article Info
Submitted: 27-12-2017
Published: 03-09-2018
Section: Articles
Tell your colleagues Email the author

Striated is seen as a fixed space and carries a sense of border. On the other hand, smooth space is seen as continuous and open interval. However, both terms are always intermingling, at one point smooth can be striated and vice versa. A city can be seen as a striated (border) and as smooth space (urban sprawl). Looking at a strip near Pasar Ciputat, Tangerang Selatan, this paper investigates how space changes function and identity overtime. The strip becomes a good example of analyzing the smooth and striated space practiced in everyday life. This strip is heavily populated by street vendors who has ‘occupying schedule’ and continuously changes the patterns of occupation. They prefer to sell goods on the road instead of in the provided building. By midnight, the road is not accessible as the vendors closed off and sell their goods on the road. In the morning and afternoon, some vendors disappear and their former space has been used by other vendors to sell different goods. Through observation, urban morphological mapping and photographic analysis, this paper uncovers the fluid uses and meaning of the space.

Keywords

fluid space; the image of the city; smooth and striated space

  1. Eka Permanasari  Scopus
    Departemen Arsitektur, Universitas Pembangunan Jaya, Indonesia
    Eka Permanasari currently works as the Vice Dean in Academic at the University of Pembangunan Jaya. She is a senior lecturer and has published several journal articles, book and chapter in books.
  2. Bonardo Tobing 
    Departemen Arsitektur, Universitas Pembangunan Jaya, Indonesia
  1. Adkins, B. (2015). Deleuze and Guattari's Thousand Plateaus: A Critical Introduction and Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  2. Deleuze, G. &. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schrizophrenia. London: University of Minesota Press.
  3. District, T. (2004). Surat Keputuasan Bupati Tangerang No 511.2/Kep 249-Huk/2004. Tangerang Regency: Bupati Tangerang.
  4. Dovey, K. (2010). Becoming Places. New York: london.
  5. Dovey, K; King, R. (2011). Forms of Informality: Morphology and Visibility of Informal Settlements. Built Environment, 11-29
  6. Kamalipour, H. (2016). Forms of Informality and Adaptations in Informal Settlements. Archnet-IJAR, Volume 10 - Issue 3 , 60-75
  7. Kusno, A. (2000). Architecture, Urban Space, and Political Cultures in Indonesia. London and New York: Routledge.
  8. Lynch, K. (1959). The Image of the City. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  9. Martin, R & Mathema, A. (2006). Clash of Civilization. In M. Huchzermeyer, & Karam, Informal Settlements (pp. 126-145). Cape Town: UCT Press.
  10. Nachimias, D. &. (1976). Research Methods in the Social Science. United Kingdom: Edward Arnold.
  11. Rossi, A. (1986). The Architecture of the City. US: The MIT Press.
  12. Rukayah, S., & Supriadi, B. (2017). Pasar di Sudut Tiga Koridor Lama Semarang Sebagai Pembentuk Place dan Linkage ekonomi. Tataloka, 82-92.
  13. Tangsel, P. K. (July 2010). Executive Summary: Kajian dan Evaluasi Pasar Ciputat. Tangerang selatan.
  14. Tangsel, P. K. (n.d.). Perjanjian Kerjasama Bersyarat No. 551.22/1755-Um/1992. 1992.