DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.20.2.181-194

KONSEP DESAIN EKOLOGIS RUANG TERBUKA HIJAU DI SUDIRMAN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (SCBD) SEBAGAI HABITAT BURUNG

Andi Gunawan  -  Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia
*Setia Permana  -  Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Landscape in Central Business District (CBD) is part of urban green spaces which have a role to enhance ecological value of the city, one of them is Sudirman Central Business Distict. The existence of birds will strengthen the ecological functions of the city. The aim of this study is to design the green spaces as bird habitat. Lot 17 SCBD has the potential to be developed as a bird sanctuary protection area divided into two areas: nesting and transition area. The method that will be used for this research is descriptive analysis through site survey and literature. The concept that used is eco-friendly bird park, a park that is able to present the directly or indirectly interaction between humans and birds without reducing the fulfillment of ecological functions of the park. The design concept applies the deco art style that has a dynamic impression and a pliable flexible shape. The dynamic impression will be applied in the form of arches on the park patterns and circulations to create natural impression. The existence of Lot 17 park can soften the surrounding condition, which is a storey building. Visitors can observe birds on tree canopies using binoculars that is placed on the deck view and canopy tree rail.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: bird attraction; bird conservation; landscape; sanctuary; protection area; urban park

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
POLA MIX USE RUANG RUMAH TINGGAL PENGRAJIN BATIK DESA BABAGAN YANG BERBASIS GENDER MENGATUR DESA WISATA: PERAN TOKOH MASYARAKAT MEMBANGUN INISIATIF KOLEKTIF DALAM PENGEMBANGAN PARIWISATA BERBASIS KOMUNITAS KONSEP DESAIN EKOLOGIS RUANG TERBUKA HIJAU DI SUDIRMAN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (SCBD) SEBAGAI HABITAT BURUNG Back matter Front matter More recent articles
  1. Aida N, Sasidhran S, Kamarudin N, Aziz N, Puan CL, Azhar B. 2016. Woody trees, green space and park size improve avian biodiversity inurban landscapes of Peninsular Malaysia. Ecological Indicators, 69:176–183
  2. Barth BJ, FitzGibbon SI, Wilson RS. 2014. New urban development that retain more remnant trees have greater bird diversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 136:122–129
  3. Breeding Biology Research & Monitoring Database [BBIRD] University of Montana. 2010. Kriteria luas habitat burung ideal. Montana (US)
  4. Booth NK. 1983. Basic Elements of Landscape Architectural Design. Illinois (US): Waveland Press
  5. Chong KY, Teo S, Kurukulasuriya B, Chung YF, Rajathurai S, Tan HTW. 2014. Not all green is as good: Different effects of the natural and cultivated components of urban vegetation on bird and butterfly diversity. Biological Conservation, 171:299–309
  6. Conole LE. Dan Kirkpatrick JB. 2011. Functional and spatial differentiation of urban bird assemblages at the landscape scale. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100:11–23
  7. Higuchi H. 2016. Rekam Jejak Perjalanan Migrasi Burung Menggunakan Teknologi Satellite-Tracking. Syartinilia, penerjemah; Mulyani YA, editor. Bogor (ID): IPB Press. Terjemahan dari: The Journey of Birds Satellite-Tracking Bird Migration. Ed ke-1
  8. Mariski, Nasrullah N, Gunawan A. 2017. Persepsi dan Preferensi Pengunjung Terhadap Kenyamanan Klimatologis di Taman Menteng dan Taman Honda Tebet. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia, 9(1):24–35
  9. Nieuwolt S, McGregor GR. 1998. Tropical Climatology. England (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd
  10. Pellissier V, Cohen M, Boulay A, Clergeau P. 2012. Birds are also sensitive to landscape composition and configuration within the city centre. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104:181–188
  11. Pratiwi V, Gunawan A, Fatima IS. 2014. Kajian Ecodesign Lanskap Permukiman Perkotaan. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia, 6(1):25–31
  12. Ramirez PC. Dan Zuria I. 2011. The value of small urban greenspaces for birds in a Mexican city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100:213–222
  13. Reis E, Ibora GBL, Pinheiro RT. 2012. Changes in bird species richness through different levels of urbanization: Implications for biodiversity conservation and garden design in Central Brazil. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107:31–42
  14. Sandstorm UG, Angelstam P, Mikusinski G. 2006. Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 77:39–53
  15. Sembiring. 2010. http:// antaranews.com. [21.59, 25 Desember 2012]
  16. Setiawan A, Alikodra HS, Gunawan A, Darnaedi D. 2006. Keanekaragaman jenis pohon dna burung di beberapa areal Hutan Kota Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 12(1):1–13
  17. Shwartz SE. 2008. Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth’s climate system. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113
  18. Strohbach MW, Lerman SB, Warren PS. 2013. Are small greening areas enhancing bird diversity? Insights from community-driven greening projects in Boston. Landscape and Urban Planning, 114:69-79
  19. Sulaiman S, Mohamad NHN, Idilfitri S. 2013. Contribution of Vegetation in Urban Parks as Habitat for Selective Bird Community. Social and Behavioral Science, 85:267–281
  20. Van der Ryn S. Dan Cowan S. 1996. Ecological Design. Washington DC: Island Press

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.