KONSEP DESAIN EKOLOGIS RUANG TERBUKA HIJAU DI SUDIRMAN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (SCBD) SEBAGAI HABITAT BURUNG

Andi Gunawan; Setia Permana

doi:10.14710/tataloka.20.2.181-194

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.20.2.181-194

KONSEP DESAIN EKOLOGIS RUANG TERBUKA HIJAU DI SUDIRMAN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (SCBD) SEBAGAI HABITAT BURUNG

Andi Gunawan - Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia

*Setia Permana - Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia

Citation Format:

Abstract

Landscape in Central Business District (CBD) is part of urban green spaces which have a role to enhance ecological value of the city, one of them is Sudirman Central Business Distict. The existence of birds will strengthen the ecological functions of the city. The aim of this study is to design the green spaces as bird habitat. Lot 17 SCBD has the potential to be developed as a bird sanctuary protection area divided into two areas: nesting and transition area. The method that will be used for this research is descriptive analysis through site survey and literature. The concept that used is eco-friendly bird park, a park that is able to present the directly or indirectly interaction between humans and birds without reducing the fulfillment of ecological functions of the park. The design concept applies the deco art style that has a dynamic impression and a pliable flexible shape. The dynamic impression will be applied in the form of arches on the park patterns and circulations to create natural impression. The existence of Lot 17 park can soften the surrounding condition, which is a storey building. Visitors can observe birds on tree canopies using binoculars that is placed on the deck view and canopy tree rail.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: bird attraction; bird conservation; landscape; sanctuary; protection area; urban park

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 20, No 2 (2018): Volume 20 Number 2, May 2018

Recent articles

PERAN PERTAMBANGAN TERHADAP PENGEMBANGAN WILAYAH KABUPATEN TANGGAMUS PROVINSI LAMPUNG PENGEMBANGAN KAWASAN PARIWISATA DANAU TOBA, KABUPATEN TOBA SAMOSIR KEBIJAKAN PENGEMBANGAN INDUSTRI BATIK DI KABUPATEN KLATEN, QUO VADIS? Front matter Back matter More recent articles

Aida N, Sasidhran S, Kamarudin N, Aziz N, Puan CL, Azhar B. 2016. Woody trees, green space and park size improve avian biodiversity inurban landscapes of Peninsular Malaysia. Ecological Indicators, 69:176–183
Barth BJ, FitzGibbon SI, Wilson RS. 2014. New urban development that retain more remnant trees have greater bird diversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 136:122–129
Breeding Biology Research & Monitoring Database [BBIRD] University of Montana. 2010. Kriteria luas habitat burung ideal. Montana (US)
Booth NK. 1983. Basic Elements of Landscape Architectural Design. Illinois (US): Waveland Press
Chong KY, Teo S, Kurukulasuriya B, Chung YF, Rajathurai S, Tan HTW. 2014. Not all green is as good: Different effects of the natural and cultivated components of urban vegetation on bird and butterfly diversity. Biological Conservation, 171:299–309
Conole LE. Dan Kirkpatrick JB. 2011. Functional and spatial differentiation of urban bird assemblages at the landscape scale. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100:11–23
Higuchi H. 2016. Rekam Jejak Perjalanan Migrasi Burung Menggunakan Teknologi Satellite-Tracking. Syartinilia, penerjemah; Mulyani YA, editor. Bogor (ID): IPB Press. Terjemahan dari: The Journey of Birds Satellite-Tracking Bird Migration. Ed ke-1
Mariski, Nasrullah N, Gunawan A. 2017. Persepsi dan Preferensi Pengunjung Terhadap Kenyamanan Klimatologis di Taman Menteng dan Taman Honda Tebet. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia, 9(1):24–35
Nieuwolt S, McGregor GR. 1998. Tropical Climatology. England (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Pellissier V, Cohen M, Boulay A, Clergeau P. 2012. Birds are also sensitive to landscape composition and configuration within the city centre. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104:181–188
Pratiwi V, Gunawan A, Fatima IS. 2014. Kajian Ecodesign Lanskap Permukiman Perkotaan. Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia, 6(1):25–31
Ramirez PC. Dan Zuria I. 2011. The value of small urban greenspaces for birds in a Mexican city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100:213–222
Reis E, Ibora GBL, Pinheiro RT. 2012. Changes in bird species richness through different levels of urbanization: Implications for biodiversity conservation and garden design in Central Brazil. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107:31–42
Sandstorm UG, Angelstam P, Mikusinski G. 2006. Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 77:39–53
Sembiring. 2010. http:// antaranews.com. [21.59, 25 Desember 2012]
Setiawan A, Alikodra HS, Gunawan A, Darnaedi D. 2006. Keanekaragaman jenis pohon dna burung di beberapa areal Hutan Kota Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 12(1):1–13
Shwartz SE. 2008. Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth’s climate system. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113
Strohbach MW, Lerman SB, Warren PS. 2013. Are small greening areas enhancing bird diversity? Insights from community-driven greening projects in Boston. Landscape and Urban Planning, 114:69-79
Sulaiman S, Mohamad NHN, Idilfitri S. 2013. Contribution of Vegetation in Urban Parks as Habitat for Selective Bird Community. Social and Behavioral Science, 85:267–281
Van der Ryn S. Dan Cowan S. 1996. Ecological Design. Washington DC: Island Press

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

As an article writer, the author has the right to use their articles for various purposes, including use by institutions that employ authors or institutions that provide funding for research. Author rights are granted without special permission.

Author who publishes a paper at Tataloka has the broad right to use their work for teaching and scientific purposes without the need to ask permission, including: used for (i) teaching in the author's class or institution, (ii) presentation at meetings or conferences and distributing copies to participants ; (iii) training conducted by the author or author's institution; (iv) distribution to colleagues for research use; (v) use in the compilation of subsequent authors' works; (vi) inclusion in a thesis or dissertation; (vi) reuse of part of the article in another work (with citation); (vii) preparation of derivative works (with citation); (viii) voluntary posting on open websites operated by authors or author institutions for scientific purposes.

Authors and readers can copy and redistribute material in any media or format, and mix, modify, and build material for any purpose but they must provide appropriate credit (provide article citation or content), providing links to the license, and indicate if there are changes.

The authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Tataloka . Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.

Reproduce any part of this journal, its storage in the database or its transmission by all forms or media is permitted does not need for written permission from Tataloka . However, it should be cited as an honor in academic manners

Tataloka and the Department of Urban and Regional Planning of Diponegoro University and the Editor make every effort to ensure that there are no data, opinions, or false or misleading statements published in Tataloka. However, the content of the article is the sole and exclusive responsibility of each author.

The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form - Indonesian] [Copyright Transfer Form - English]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editor in the form of printed letters, scanned documents sent via email or fax.