Evaluasi Pembangunan Berkelanjutan dengan Rendah Karbon pada Sektor Pertanian Padi

Dwi Sartika Adetama; Akhmad Fauzi; Bambang Juanda; Dedi Budiman Hakim

doi:10.14710/tataloka.25.1.50-69

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.25.1.50-69

Evaluasi Pembangunan Berkelanjutan dengan Rendah Karbon pada Sektor Pertanian Padi

*Dwi Sartika Adetama

- Badan Ketahanan Pangan, Kementerian Pertanian, Indonesia

Akhmad Fauzi - Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia

Bambang Juanda - Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia

Dedi Budiman Hakim - Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia

under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{tataloka12596,
    author = {Dwi Adetama and Akhmad Fauzi and Bambang Juanda and Dedi Hakim},
    title = {Evaluasi Pembangunan Berkelanjutan dengan Rendah Karbon pada Sektor Pertanian Padi},
    journal = {TATALOKA},
  volume = {25},
    number = {1},
    year = {2023},
    keywords = {Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, Pertanian, Padi, Rap_withoutLCD, Rendah Karbon},
    abstract = {Pembangunan nasional berkelanjutan yang selama ini dilakukan oleh pemerintah tingkat keberhasilannya masih belum dinikmati oleh setiap provinsi di Indonesia, sebagian didominasi di Pulau Jawa. Pembangunan selama ini menggunakan skenario business as usual (BAU) diukur berdasarkan aspek pertumbuhan ekonomi tapi tidak memperhitungkan dampak lingkungan. Permasalahan mulai muncul disaat terdapat ketimpangan antara dimensi ekonomi dengan dampak lingkungan yaitu emisi gas rumah kaca. Penelitian ini mengusulkan pendekatan dalam mengevaluasi pembangunan nasional BAU dengan rendah karbon menggunakan Teknik Rap_withoutLCD  berdasarkan Multi Dimensional Scalling (MDS). Objek penelitian pada tanaman padi, data yang dianalisis adalah data sekunder tahun 2014-2018, beberapa literature dan penelitian lain. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan nilai tukar petani, konsumsi beras, produksi padi, penduduk buta huruf, persebaran penduduk, persentase penduduk miskin, percetakan sawah, curah hujan, suhu, tekonologi informasi, pompa air, Rice Milling Unit, penggunaan pupuk organik, peraturan rendah karbon, dan emisi gas rumah kaca merupakan atribut yang sensitif terhadap pembangunan nasional berkelanjutan. Artinya jika atribut tersebut dihilangkan maka akan berdampak pada status keberlanjutan. Penelitian ini menunjukkan hasil evaluasi eksisting pembangunan konsep BAU dengan rendah karbon didominasi antara kurang (less sustainable) dan cukup (quite sustainable) di setiap provinsi sehingga pemerintah perlu menerapkan kebijakan transformasi pembangunan pertanian rendah karbon yang dapat menunjang produktivitas pertanian dan juga pembangunan nasional di Indonesia.   },
   issn = {2356-0266},   pages = {50--69}  doi = {10.14710/tataloka.25.1.50-69},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/tataloka/article/view/12596}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Pembangunan nasional berkelanjutan yang selama ini dilakukan oleh pemerintah tingkat keberhasilannya masih belum dinikmati oleh setiap provinsi di Indonesia, sebagian didominasi di Pulau Jawa. Pembangunan selama ini menggunakan skenario business as usual (BAU) diukur berdasarkan aspek pertumbuhan ekonomi tapi tidak memperhitungkan dampak lingkungan. Permasalahan mulai muncul disaat terdapat ketimpangan antara dimensi ekonomi dengan dampak lingkungan yaitu emisi gas rumah kaca. Penelitian ini mengusulkan pendekatan dalam mengevaluasi pembangunan nasional BAU dengan rendah karbon menggunakan Teknik Rap_withoutLCD berdasarkan Multi Dimensional Scalling (MDS). Objek penelitian pada tanaman padi, data yang dianalisis adalah data sekunder tahun 2014-2018, beberapa literature dan penelitian lain. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan nilai tukar petani, konsumsi beras, produksi padi, penduduk buta huruf, persebaran penduduk, persentase penduduk miskin, percetakan sawah, curah hujan, suhu, tekonologi informasi, pompa air, Rice Milling Unit, penggunaan pupuk organik, peraturan rendah karbon, dan emisi gas rumah kaca merupakan atribut yang sensitif terhadap pembangunan nasional berkelanjutan. Artinya jika atribut tersebut dihilangkan maka akan berdampak pada status keberlanjutan. Penelitian ini menunjukkan hasil evaluasi eksisting pembangunan konsep BAU dengan rendah karbon didominasi antara kurang (less sustainable) dan cukup (quite sustainable) di setiap provinsi sehingga pemerintah perlu menerapkan kebijakan transformasi pembangunan pertanian rendah karbon yang dapat menunjang produktivitas pertanian dan juga pembangunan nasional di Indonesia.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, Pertanian, Padi, Rap_withoutLCD, Rendah Karbon

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : ID

In Vol 25, No 1 (2023): Volume 25 No. 1 February 2023

Recent articles

Evaluasi Pembangunan Berkelanjutan dengan Rendah Karbon pada Sektor Pertanian Padi The Decision-Making in Planning of Housing on Musi Riverbank, Palembang Korelasi Antar Aspek Pembentuk Tipologi Wilayah Peri Urban Kecamatan Sungai Raya More recent articles

Adiga, Suresha, Ananthan, Ramasubramanian, Divya Kumari. 2015. Validating RAPFISH sustainaibility indicators: focus on multi-disciplinary aspects of Indian marine fisheries. Marine Policy 60: 202-207
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Statistik Indonesia 2021. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik
Bai Yuping, Xiangzheng Deng, Sijian Jiang, Zhe Zhao, Yi Miao. 2018. Relationship between climate change and low-carbon agricultural production: A case study in Hebei Province, China. journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolind
Bain PG, Kroonenberg PM, Johanssom LO, Milfont TL, Crimston CR, Kurz T, Bushina E, Calligaro C, Demarque C, Guan Y, Park J. 2019. Public Views of The Sustainable Development Goals, in: International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
Daly HE. 1997. Beyond Growth: The Economics Of Sustainable Development. Beacon Press
Fauzi A. 2014. Valuasi Ekonomi dan Penilaian Kerusakan Sumber daya Alam dan lingkungan. Bogor: IPB Press
Fauzi A. 2019. Teknik Analisis Keberlanjutan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Fauzi A, Anna S. 2005. Permodelan Sumber Daya Perikanan dan Kelautan. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Fauzi A, Oxtavianus A. 2014. Pengukuran Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Mimbar Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 30:68-83
Humanities Education Centre Global Learning. 2009. What is sustainability? http://www. globalfootprints.org/sustainability
Kavanagh P, Pitcher. 2004. Implementing Microsoft Excel Software for Rapfish: A technique for the Rapid Appraisal of Fisheries Status. Fisheries Centre Research Reports 12 (2). University of British Columbia, Canda
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. 2019. Laporan Inventarisasi Gas Rumah Kaca (GRK) dan Monitoring, Pelaporan, Verifikasi (MPV) Tahun 2018. Jakarta: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan
Kholil, Ita Junita PD. 2014. The Use of MDS (Multidimensional Scaling) Method to Analyze the Level of Sustainability of Fisheries Resources Management in Thousand Islands, Indonesia. International Journal of Marine Science 2014, Vol.4, No.27, 245-252
Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, Lubchenco J. 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317(5844), 1513-1516
Liu X, Yansui L, Yang R, Jian Z, Xinzheng Z. 2020. Evaluation of sustainable agriculture and rural development in agro-pastoral ecotone under climate change: A comparative study of three villages in the Shenfu coalfield, China. Journal of Rural Studies, 15 January 2020
Lu Y, Nakicenovic N, Visbeck M, Stevance AS. 2015. Policy: Five priorities for the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Nature 520(7548), 432-433
Maltus TR. 1978. An Esray on the Principle of Population. New York: Norton
Moraes JCD, Lal Rotan, Carlos Clemente Cerri, Klaus Lorenz, Mariangela Hungria, Paulo Cesar De Faccio Carvalho. 2016. Low Carbon Agriculture in South America to Mitigate Global Climate Change and Advance Food Security. Journal Environment International, 98: 102-112
OECD, 2015. Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development in the SDG Framework: Shaping Targets and Monitoring Progress. OECD Publishing, Paris
Pitcher TJ. 1999. Rapfish, A Rapid Appraisal Technique for Fisheries, and Its Application to the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. FAO Fisheries Circular No. 947. Rome, Italy
Pitcher TJ, Preikshot. 2001. Rapfish: A Rapid Appraisal Technique to Evaluate the Sustainability Status of Fisheries.Fisheries Research 49(3): 255- 270
Pitcher TJ, M.E Lam, C. Ainsworth, A. Martindale, K. Nakamura, R.I. Perry, T. Ward. 2013. Improvements to Rapfish: A Rapid Evaluation Technique for Fisheries Integrating Ecological and Human Dimensions. Journal of Fish Biology 83(4): 865-889
Rachmat M, Bunasor S, Sinaga BM, Kuntjoro, Simatupang P, Saragih B. 2000. Analisis Nilai Tukar Petani Indonesia (DIsertasi). Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor
Roegen NG. 1971. The Entropy Law and The Economic Process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Sachs J, Schmidt-Traub G, Kroll C, Durand-Delacre D, Teksoz K. 2017. SDG Index and 495 dashboards report 2017. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development 496 Solutions Network (SDSN)
Sachs J, Schmidt-Traub G, Kroll C, Lafortune G, Fuller G. 2019. Sustainable Development Report 2019. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN)
Salimova G, Alisa A, Gamir K, Zariya Z, Gulaz V, Aigul H. 2020. Evaluation of level of agricultural development based on integration index. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 19: 319-325
Shenggen AR. 2012. Achieving food security while switching to low carbon agriculture. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 4, 041405
Simatupang P, M. Maulana. 2009. Kaji Ulang Konsep dan Perkembangan Nilai Tukar Petani Tahun 2003-2006. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan. LIPI
Stiglitz JE, Sen A, Fitoussi JP. 2010. Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP doesn’t Add up. New York (USA): The New Press
Trebeck K, Williams J. 2019. The Economics of Arrival: Ideas for a Grown up Economy. Bristol (UK): Policy Press

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.

As an article writer, the author has the right to use their articles for various purposes, including use by institutions that employ authors or institutions that provide funding for research. Author rights are granted without special permission.

Author who publishes a paper at Tataloka has the broad right to use their work for teaching and scientific purposes without the need to ask permission, including: used for (i) teaching in the author's class or institution; (ii) presentation at meetings or conferences and distributing copies to participants; (iii) training conducted by the author or author's institution; (iv) distribution to colleagues for research use; (v) use in the compilation of subsequent authors' works; (vi) inclusion in a thesis or dissertation; (vi) reuse of part of the article in another work (with citation); (vii) preparation of derivative works (with citation); (viii) voluntary posting on open websites operated by authors or author institutions for scientific purposes.

Authors and readers can copy and redistribute material in any media or format, and mix, modify, and build material for any purpose but they must provide appropriate credit (provide article citation or content), providing links to the license, and indicate if there are changes.

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, non-exclusive right for publishing (publishing right) of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Publisher of Universitas Diponegoro Publishing Group.

Reproduce any part of this journal, its storage in the database or its transmission by all forms or media is permitted does not need for written permission from Tataloka . However, it should be cited as an honor in academic manners

Tataloka and the Department of Urban and Regional Planning of Diponegoro University and the Editor make every effort to ensure that there are no data, opinions, or false or misleading statements published in Tataloka. However, the content of the article is the sole and exclusive responsibility of each author.