POLA SEBARAN RUANG AKTIVITAS PKL DI RUANG PUBLIK KAWASAN PECINAN SEMARANG

*Retno Widjajanti -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro
Sunarti Sunarti -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro
Wido Prananing Tyas -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro
Received: 17 May 2017; Published: 31 Aug 2017.
Open Access
Citation Format:
Abstract

Street vendors has grown rapidly in functional areas in Semarang City, such as in Chinatown. Problems arise when street vendors start using public spaces as a place to trade. The sidewalks and roadside used by street vendors for activities disrupt the main function of the public space. This condition occurs because the government does not have a clear reference about the activity space for street vendors. The relocation efforts undertaken by the government have not considered the characteristics and spatial behavior of street vendors so the relocation often fail and street vendors tend to re-trade in the first place. The study of space for street vendors is urgently need, in line with the increasing conflict of space for street vendors in various regions of Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to identify the space livability of street vendors in Pecinan based on the spatial behavior of street vendors. The research used quantitative descriptive method by using questionnaire as data collection technique. The results showed that agglomeration, strategic location, main activity and accessibility are the variables that influence the pattern of spatial distribution of street vendors activity.

Keywords
pattern of spatial distribution, street vendors activity, pecinan area

Article Metrics:

  1. Creswell, Tim. 1996. In Place/Out of Place: Ideology, and Transgressio. Minneapolis, London University of Minnesota Press.
  2. De Soto, Hernando. (1992). Masih Ada Jalan Lain: Revolusi Tersembunyi Di Negara Dunia Ketiga. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  3. Hough, Michael. 1990. Out of Place: Restoring Identity to The Regional. New Heaven & London; Yale University Press.
  4. Laurens, Joyce Marcella. 2004. Arsitektur dan Perilaku Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.
  5. Lawson, Bryan. (2001). The Language of Space. Great Brintain: Plant A Tree
  6. Mc Gee, T.G., dan Yeung, Y.M. (1977). Hawkers in Southeast Asian Cities: Planning for The Bazaar Economy. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre (IDRC).
  7. Peraturan Daerah Kota Semarang No. 11 tahun 2000 tentang Pengaturan dan Pembinaan Pedagang Kaki Lima.
  8. Peraturan Daerah No. 14 tahun 2011 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wiayah Kota Semarang 2011-2031. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kota Semarang.
  9. Rachbini, Didik J., dan Hamid, Abdul. (1994). Ekonomi Informal Perkotaan: Gejala Involusi Gelombang Kedua. Jakarta: Lembaga Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerangan Ekonomi dan Sosial (LP3ES).
  10. Sethuraman, S.V. (1991). Sektor Informal di Negara Sedang Berkembang. Urbanisasi, Pengangguran, dan Sektor Informal di Kota. Penyunting: Chris Manning dan Tadjuddin Noer Effendi. Jakarta: Penerbit PT. Gramedia: 90-108.
  11. Shirvani, Hamid. (1985). The Urban Design Process. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, Inc.
  12. Widjajanti, Retno. (2015). Perilaku Berlokasi Pedagang Kaki Lima Di Ruang Publik Kota (Kasus Studi: Kawasan Pendidikan Tembalang, Kota Semarang. Disertasi Doktor tidak dipublikasikan. Program Doktor Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Program Pascasarjana Institut Teknologi Bandung
  13. Xinzhe Peng, Xiangming Chen, Yuan Cheng. Urbanization and Its Consequences. China: Demography – Vol.II.
  14. Yatmo, Yandi Andri. (2008). Street Vendors as Out of Place Urban Elements. Journal of Urban Design, Vol.13. No.3, 387-402, October 2008.
  15. Yuki, Kazuhiro. 2006. “Urbanization, Informal Sector, and Development”. Journal of Development Economics 84 (2007) 76–103.