DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/southsight.202631682

Understanding Audience Engagement: A Qualitative Study of User Responses to the #kaburajadulu Campaign on TikTok

*Reyvani Alika Riksa  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Received: 7 Jan 2026; Revised: 31 Mar 2026; Accepted: 31 Mar 2026; Published: 30 Apr 2026.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 Reyvani Alika Riksa
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study examines o how audiences engage with and respond to the #kaburajadulu digital campaign on TikTok, an organic social media campaign among Indonesian youth expressing dissatisfaction with socio-economic conditions in Indonesia. This research employs a qualitative comment analysis approach, in which this research analyzed 500 purposively selected comments from 1,347 accessible comments on a highly engaged TikTok video associated with the campaign. Comments were classified into three analytical dimensions: perception, emotional engagement, and judgmental evaluation, with positive and negative sentiments identified across each category. Findings reveal that negative sentiments dominate (62.2%), with judgmental evaluations accounting for the majority of responses (60.0%). Audience comments reflect frustration over limited employment opportunities, rising living costs, and dissatisfaction with domestic socio-economic conditions, alongside aspirations for better lives abroad. Drawing on participatory culture theory, collective action theory, and public opinion theory, this study demonstrates that the TikTok comment section functions as a participatory digital space where users collectively express public opinion, construct shared meanings, and negotiate socio-political issues. This research contributes to digital communication studies by illustrating how viral social media campaigns serve as platforms for emotional expression and public discourse formation among Indonesian youth.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Audience engagement; TikTok; digital campaign; #kaburajadulu; digital communication

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
  1. Abidin, C. (2021). Mapping Internet Celebrity on TikTok: Exploring Attention Economies and Visibility Labours. Cultural Science, 12(1), 77-103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140
  2. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press
  3. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
  4. Boulianne, S. (2019). Revolution in the making? Social media effects on political participation. Information, Communication & Society, 22(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1353641
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  6. Cortés-Ramos, A., Torrecilla García, J. A., Landa-Blanco, M., Poleo Gutiérrez, F. J., & Castilla Mesa, M. T. (2021). Activism and social media: Youth participation and communication. Sustainability, 13(18), 10485. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810485
  7. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York University Press
  8. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press
  9. Hendrickx, J. (2024). ‘Normal News Is Boring’: How Young Adults Encounter and Experience News on Instagram and TikTok. New Media & Society. 27(10), 5736-5754. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241255955
  10. Literat, I., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2019). Youth Collective Political Expression on Social Media: The Role of Affordances and Memetic Dimensions for Voicing Political Views. New Media & Society, 21(9), 1988–2009. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819837571
  11. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The Spiral of Silence: A Theory of Public Opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/1466984
  12. Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press
  13. Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press
  14. Papacharissi, Z. (2016). Affective publics and structures of storytelling: sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697
  15. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–217
  16. Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
  17. Vogels, E. A., Auxier, B., Rainie, L., & Anderson, M. (2022). Teens, Social Media and Technology 2022. Pew Research Center
  18. Zeng, J., & Abidin, C. (2021). ‘#OkBoomer, time to meet the Zoomers’: Studying the Memefication of Intergenerational Politics on TikTok. Information, Communication & Society, 24(16), 2459–2481. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1961007

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.