DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ruang.5.1.69-82

Karakteristik Taman Menteri Soepeno sebagai Taman Ramah Anak di Kota Semarang

1Universitas Semarang, Indonesia

2Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia


Citation Format:
Abstract

The child-friendly city is a city that gives attention to and recognizes the existence of children's rights, including the provision of children's play facilities. Public facilities that can reflect recognition of children's rights are parks. The purpose of this study is to find out the characteristic of Menteri Soepeno park as a child-friendly park in Semarang city. This park is expected to be a reference for the development of child-friendly parks in realizing a child-friendly city. The method used in this research is quantitative with scoring analysis. The result showed that Menteri Soepeno park was not child-friendly, some improvements were needed so this park could be one of facility that supports the realization of a child-friendly city in Semarang.

 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: park; city; child-friendly

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : IND
Recent articles
Penilaian Kualitas Desain Perguruan Tinggi dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan CPTED di Kota Semarang Pengembangan Angkutan Umum Terintegrasi di Kota Surakarta Identifikasi Pola Morfologi Perkampungan Adat Nagari Koto Hilalang Sumatera Barat Berdasarkan Kearifan Lokal More recent articles
  1. Edney, J. J. (1974). Human territoriality. Psychological Bulletin, 81(12), 959
  2. Garvin, A., Berens, G., & Leinberger, C. B. (1997). Urban parks and open space. Urban Land Inst
  3. Glesson, B., & Sipe, N. (2006). Creating Child Friendly Cities: Reinstating Kids In The City. London And Newyork: Routledge
  4. Hart, R. (2002). Containing Children: Some Lessons Planning For Play From New York City. Environment And Urbanization, 14(2), 135–148
  5. Herlina, N., & Nadiroh, N. (2018). PERAN STRATEGIS RUANG PUBLIK TERPADU RAMAH ANAK (RPTRA) DALAM RANGKA PEMENUHAN HAK ANAK TERHADAP LINGKUNGAN. JPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 12(1), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.21009//JPUD.121.09
  6. Hernowo, E., & Navastara, A. M. (2017). Karakteristik Ruang Publik Terpadu Ramah Anak (RPTRA) Bahari di Kecamatan Cilandak Jakarta Selatan. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 6(2), C221--C224
  7. Laurens, J. M. (2004). Arsitektur dan perilaku manusia. Penerbit PT Grasindo
  8. Lawson, B. (2007). Language of space. Routledge
  9. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city (Vol. 11). MIT press
  10. Malone, K. (2002). Street life: Youth, culture and competing uses of public space. Environment and urbanization, 14(2), 157–168
  11. Moss, D. (2010). Memory, space and time: Researching children’s lives. Childhood, 17(4), 530–544
  12. Mulyadi, S. (2010). Kota Dengan Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Anak. Buletin Tata Ruang, 26–27
  13. Prihantini, P., & Kurniawati, W. (2018). Availability of Child Friendly Parks for Supporting Child Friendly Cities in Semarang. the 3rd Geoplanning International Conference n Geomatics and Planning, Indonesia. Semarang
  14. Racelis, M., & Aguirre, A. D. M. (2002). Child rights for urban poor children in child friendly Philippine cities: views from the community. Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), 97–113
  15. Reavey, P. (2010). Spatial markings: Memory, agency and child sexual abuse. Memory Studies, 3(4), 314–329
  16. Riggio, E. (2002). Child friendly cities: good governance in the best interests of the child. Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), 45–58
  17. Rutledge, A. J. (1981). A visual approach to park design. Wiley-Interscience
  18. Sarwono, J. (2006). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Graha Ilmu
  19. Sibley, D. (2002). Geographies of exclusion: Society and difference in the West. Routledge
  20. Sturgess, D. C. (1926). Dwight C. Sturgess to Ida M. Tarbell, January 15, 1926

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.