DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ruang.12.1.30-42

Analisis Kualitas Ruang Terbuka Hijau Publik Potensial Berdasarkan Elemen Kenyamanan Fisik di Kota Semarang

Sekolah Vokasi, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia


Citation Format:
Abstract

Ruang Terbuka Hijau (RTH) publik merupakan salah satu komponen penting di perkotaan yang berfungsi sebagai penyeimbang perkembangan kota, termasuk di Kota Semarang. Dewasa ini, kebutuhan RTH publik tidak hanya menekankan pada fungsi ekologisnya saja, namun juga estetika visual dan kenyamanan elemen fisiknya.. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kualitas RTH publik berdasarkan elemen kenyamanan fisik di Kota Semarang. Pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif digunakan pada penelitian ini. Tahap pengumpulan data dilakukan secara sekunder (telaah dokumen) dan primer (wawancara, observasi). Tahapan awal penelitian dilakukan penentuan lokasi RTH publik unggulan di tiap kecamatan, dilanjutkan dengan penskoringan ketersediaan elemen fisik di seluruh lokasi RTH publik unggulan tersebut yang akan mengahasilkan lokasi yang paling potensial, selanjutnya dilakukan analisis kualitas pada RTH publik terpilih. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa RTH publik paling potensial di Kota Semarang adalah Taman Tirto Agung yang terletak di Kecamatan Banyumanik. Sedangkan hasil analisis kualitas menyimpulkan bahwa kualitas elemen kenyamanan fisik di Taman Tirto Agung berdasarkan aspek aksesibilitas dan aspek aktivitas berkualitas cukup baik, dan berdasarkan aspek fasilitas berkualitas baik. Hasil penelitian ini dapat menjadi rekomendasi bagi pemerintah Kota Semarang dalam pengembangan RTH publik, secara lokasi maupun peningkatan kualitasnya

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: analisis kualitas, RTH Publik, kenyamanan fisik, Kota Semarang

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
  1. Angestiwi, T., & Wahyuniati, F. (2022). Analisis Kualitas Ruang Terbuka Hijau Taman Monumen Perjuangan Rakyat Jawa Barat. Jurnal Kajian Ruang Vol, 2(2). http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/kr
  2. Auwalin, I., Rumayya, & Sukartini, N. M. (2025). Environmental impacts of green open space in urban Indonesia: A difference-in-differences analysis. Asian Development Review, 42(1), 89–116. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0116110525500039
  3. Chan, C. S., Si, F. H., & Marafa, L. M. (2018). Indicator development for sustainable urban park management in Hong Kong. Urban forestry & urban greening, 31, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.025
  4. Chen, L., Ng, E., An, X., Ren, C., Lee, M., Wang, U., & He, Z. (2021). Sky view factor and thermal comfort in green open spaces. Sustainable Cities and Society, 69, 102843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102843
  5. Cheng, Q. (2025). Research on improving urban park green space landscape quality based on public psychological perception: A comprehensive AHP-TOPSIS-POE evaluation of typical parks in Jinan City. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1418477. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1418477
  6. Czesak, B., & Różycka-Czas, R. (2025). Assessing accessibility and crowding in urban green spaces: A comparative study of approaches. Landscape and Urban Planning, 257, 105301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105301
  7. Fu, Y., Yang, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Xue, J., Zeng, Y., & Li, F. (2024). Reassessing urban park accessibility: An improved two-step floating catchment area method based on the physical activity services perspective. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 98, 128446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128446
  8. Ghavimi, A., Schuessler, F., & Pesch, R. (2025). A framework to evaluate public green spaces with an emphasis on recreational values for sustainable urban and rural areas: A systematic review and content analysis. Heliyon, 11(1), e41553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41553
  9. Gunawardena, K. R., Wells, M. J., & Kershaw, T. (2021). Utilising green spaces to mitigate urban heat. Urban Climate, 38, 100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100876
  10. Halecki, W., Stachura, T., Fudała, W., Stec, A., & Kuboń, S. (2023). Assessment and planning of green spaces in urban parks: A review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 88, 104280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104280
  11. Handayani, W., Rudiarto, I., & Setiadi, R. (2024). Spatial inequality of public green open space quality in Indonesian metropolitan cities. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 51(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083231123456
  12. Harjanti, I. M. (2020). Identification of Urban Park Quality in Taman Indonesia Kaya, Semarang. Journal of Architectural Design and Urbanism, 2 (2), 1-14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jadu.v2i2.7001
  13. Harjanti, I. M., Anggraini, P. (2020). Green Open Space Functions in Kauman Area, Semarang City, Indonesia. Journal of Architectural Design and Urbanism, 3 (1), 1-9 (doi: 10.14710/jadu.v3i1.7164)
  14. Harjanti, I. M., Buchori, I., & Kurniati, R. (2023). Does the Urban Park Provision Fit the Social Needs of the Community? Evidence for Semarang City, Indonesia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 31(3)
  15. Huang, Q.; Fan, C.; Wang, J.; Zheng, S.; Sun, G. (2022). An Empirical Study on the Incentive Mechanism for Public Active Involvement in Grass-Roots Social Governance Based on Stimulus-Organism-Response Theory
  16. Sustainability, 14(21), 14232. DOI: 10.3390/su142114232
  17. Knobel, P., Maneja, R., Bartoll, X., Alonso, L., Bauwelinck, M., Valentin, A., ... & Dadvand, P. (2021). Quality of urban green spaces influences residents’ use of these spaces, physical activity, and overweight/obesity. Environmental Pollution, 271, 116393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116393
  18. Nasar, J. L., & Bokharaei, S. (2021). Impressions of lighting in public squares after dark.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 73, 101548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101548
  19. Penggayuh, D., Munibah, K., & Ardiansyah, M. (2023). The impact of changes in land use on green open space and comfort index in Semarang City, Indonesia. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan, 13(4), 683–693. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.13.4.683-693
  20. Pratama, W. S., & Aji, F. M. P. (2022, August). Identifikasi Taman Bugar sebagai Langkah Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Hijau di Kota Pacitan. In Prosiding (SIAR) Seminar Ilmiah Arsitektur (pp. 142-150). https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/siar/article/view/986
  21. Pratomo, A., Soedwiwahjono, S., & Miladan, N. (2019). Kualitas taman kota sebagai ruang publik di kota surakarta berdasarkan persepsi dan preferensi pengguna. Desa-Kota: Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah, Kota, Dan Permukiman, 1(1), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.20961/desa-kota.v1i1.12494.84-95
  22. Przewoźna, P., Mielewczyk, M., & Zwierzchowska, I. (2024). Accessibility to urban green spaces: A critical review of WHO recommendations in the light of tree-covered areas assessment. Ecological Indicators, 166, 112347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112347
  23. Sitanggang, F., & Yuliastuti, N. (2025). Penentuan prioritas penyediaan taman kota baru di Kota Semarang. TATALOKA, 27(4), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.27.4.327-346
  24. Soltanifard, H., & Amani-Beni, M. (2025). The cooling effect of urban green spaces as nature-based solutions for mitigating urban heat: Insights from a decade-long systematic review. Climate Risk Management, 49, 100731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2025.100731
  25. Terefe, A. E., & Hou, Y. (2024). Determinants influencing the accessibility and use of urban green spaces: A review of empirical evidence. City and Environment Interactions, 24, 100159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacint.2024.100159
  26. United Nations. (n.d.). Goal 11: Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal11
  27. UN-Habitat. (2017). New Urban Agenda. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English-With-Index-1.pdf
  28. Xu, Z., Zhou, X., Zhang, S., & Liu, Y. (2025). Associations between urban green space quality and mental wellbeing: A systematic review. Land, 14(2), 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14020381
  29. Zhang, Y., Hu, Y., Wei, Y., & Xie, Y. (2025). Can pocket parks be compared to community parks in the restoration effect of physical and mental health for young adults? A comparative experiment in high-density urban Green spaces. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1610497
  30. Zhao, J., Gao, Y., & Li, Y. (2024). Factors influencing the usage, restrictions, accessibility, and preference of urban neighborhood parks: A review of the empirical evidence. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 98, 128421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128421

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.