DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ruang.4.1.48-56

Upaya Pelestarian Kawasan Bersejarah Kota Pusaka Parakan, Kabupaten Temanggung

Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia, Indonesia


Citation Format:
Abstract

Heritage area of Parakan is one of ancient Mataram heritage area and it was ex capital city of Menoreh. This area has so many historical relics either buildings or art. Therefore at 2015, Parakan was confirmed as heritage city by Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing (PUPR). As a heritage city, Parakan still faced several problems. There are degradation of heritage buildings, less of local government’s attention about local art. Beside that, Temanggung still do not has any regulations about conservation activity in Parakan. This research aims to know how the way conservation effort in cultural heritages in Parakan. The method used in this paper is called AHP to determine classification weight due to value of influence each variable in this research.  Land use in Parakan is dominated by trade and service area and settlement area. Those settlement consist of Kauman and Pecinan Settlement which is early establishment of Parakan City. Research output in conservation buildings shows that  the alternative of conservation in Parakan are preservation, adaptation, restoration, reconstruction, cultural transmission, and cultural revitalization.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Conservation; Historic Area, Heritage City

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Pengembangan Transit Oriented Development (TOD) pada Titik Transit Trase Light Rail Transit (LRT) Provinsi Sumatera Selatan Pelestarian Kampung Pecinan di Desa Karangturi, Kecamatan Lasem Morphological Studies: City Image and Urban Design Elements 
at Ngesrep Timur Corridor More recent articles
  1. Antariksa. (2012). Beberapa Teori Dalam Pelestarian Bangunan, 1–9. Retrieved from http://antariksaarticle.blogspot.com/2012/04/Beberapa-Teori-Dalam-Pelestarian.Html
  2. Budiharjo, E. (1997). Arsitektur Pembangunan dan Konservasi. Jakarta: Djambatan
  3. Deghati, M., Atiah, N., & Maulan, S. (2015). Visual preference dimensions of historic urban areas : The determinants for urban heritage conservation. Habitat International, 49, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.003
  4. ICOMOS. Piagam Pelestarian Pusaka Indonesia 2003 (2003)
  5. ICOMOS. (2013). The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance, 2013, 1–10. https://doi.org/363,690994 ICO
  6. Kurniawan, N. A., & Suwandono, D. (2015). Upaya Pelestarian Kota Pusaka Kawasan Klampok , Kecamatan Purworejo Klampok , Kabupaten Banjarnegara. RUANG, 1(3), 131–140
  7. Ningtyas, D. S. A., Antariksa, & Usman, F. (2010). Pelestarian Bangunan Dan Lingkungan Kawasan Bergenbuurt (Jalan Gunung-Gunung) Kota Malang. Arsitektur E-Journal, 3(1), 63–74. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/7024222/Pelestarian_Bangunan_dan_Lingkungan_Kawasan_Bergenbuurt_Jalan_Gunung-Gunung_Kota_Malang
  8. Othman, R. N. R., Hamzah, A., & Abdullah, J. (2013). A Conceptual Foundation and Methodological Framework for Developing Urban Indicator of Heritage City. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 85, 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.376
  9. Owley, J. (2015). Land Use Policy Cultural heritage conservation easements : Heritage protection with property law tools. Land Use Policy, 49, 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.007
  10. Samadi, Z., & Yunus, R. M. (2012). Physical and Spiritual Attributes of Urban Heritage Street’s Revitalization. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36(June 2011), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.038
  11. Sarvarzadeh, S. K., & Abidin, S. Z. (2012). Problematic Issues of Citizens’ Participation on Urban Heritage Conservation in the Historic Cities of Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50(July), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.029
  12. Shinbira, I. A. (2012). Conservation of the Urban Heritage to Conserve the Sense of Place , a Case Study Misurata City , Libya. American Transaction on Engineering & Applied Sciences, 1(3), 253–264. Retrieved from http://tuengr.com/ATEAS/V01/253-264.pdf
  13. Siti, N., Antariksa, & Nindya, S. (2011). Vitalitas Kawasan Bersejarah P.T Garam Kalianget-Madura, 4(November 2011), 174–184. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/7177899/Vitalitas_Kawasan_Bersejarah_PT_Garam_Kalianget-Madura
  14. UNESCO. World Declaration on Education For All and Framework For Action to Meet Basic Learning Needs (2013)
  15. Yung, E. H. K., Lai, L. W. C., & Yu, P. L. H. (2016). Public decision making for heritage conservation: A Hong Kong empirical study. Habitat International, 53, 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.12.004

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.