skip to main content

Analisis Komparatif Durasi Pelaksanaan Metode Konvensional dan Metode Flying Formwork Pada Pekerjaan Abutment Bridge 9 Pada Proyek Akses Tol Patimban Paket 1

*Asyril Adzim  -  Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan, Fakultas Pendidikan Teknik dan Industri, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Reinforced concrete works in bridge structures have a high level of complexity, particularly in abutment construction with significant height and unstable soil conditions. One of the most influential activities affecting construction duration is formwork work. In the Patimban Access Toll Road Construction Project Package 1, specifically at Abutment Bridge 9, soft soil conditions and limited working space became major constraints in applying conventional formwork methods that rely on ground-supported scaffolding. This study aims to analyze and compare the duration of formwork execution between the conventional method and the flying formwork method in abutment construction. The research employed a descriptive comparative approach, with the main parameter being the duration of formwork activities. Data were obtained through field observations, project documentation studies, and recording of execution time for each stage of work. The analysis results show that the conventional formwork method requires an execution time of approximately ±40 days, while the flying formwork method requires approximately ±16 days. There is a duration difference of ±24 days, indicating that the flying formwork method is more time-efficient. This efficiency is mainly influenced by the elimination of ground improvement work and multi-level scaffolding installation, which are characteristic of the conventional method. Based on the results of this study, the flying formwork method is considered more effective for abutment construction with significant structural height and unstable soil conditions.
Fulltext Email colleagues

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : ID
  1. Adam, A. F. S., Winanda, L. A. R., & Wibawanto, H. S. (2025). Time and cost efficiency of conventional formwork in building projects. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Cendekia, 6(1), 90–99.doi: 10.51988/jtsc.v6i1.280
  2. Atep Maskur, I., Fuadi, I., & Sukmara, E. (2023). Comparative analysis of cost and time between multiplex timber formwork and bondek formwork for floor slabs. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Terapan, 9(2).doi: 10.33197/jitter.vol9.iss2.2023.1023
  3. Atidaputra, Z. R., Nugraha Azka, M. R., Hakim, F. F., & Abda, J. (2024). Perbandingan elemen struktur yang dicetak dengan bekisting aluminium dan konvensional menggunakan metode Six Sigma. Jurnal Inovasi Konstruksi, 3(2).doi: 10.56911/jik.v3i2.126
  4. Atmaja, T. D. B., Susanto, H., & Susanti, E. I. (2024). Analisis waktu dan biaya terhadap bekisting konvensional dan knock down pada Tower Ta’miriyah Surabaya. Composite: Journal of Civil Engineering, 3(2)
  5. Kusuma, A. (2022). Comparison analysis of cost and time forming conventional method with semi-system method for column Namira Hotel Surabaya. IJTI International Journal of Transportation and Infrastructure, 6(1), 38–45.doi: 10.29138/ijti.v6i1.2076
  6. Pramudiharto, A., Partono, W., & Sukamta, S. (2025). Analisis perbandingan waktu pelaksanaan pekerjaan struktur bangunan bertingkat metode aluminium formwork dengan metode konvensional. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(6), 2807–2824.doi: 10.59141/japendi.v6i6.8052
  7. Sirait, E. G., Welan, P. C., & Tanne, Y. A. (2023). Perbandingan penggunaan sistem bekisting konvensional dan aluminium pada proyek pembangunan mall X. CRANE: Civil Engineering Research Journal, 4(1), 49–57
  8. Supriyono, A. S., Putra, I. N. D. P., & Trigunarsyah, B. (2025). Comparative analysis of formwork systems: Cost efficiency and time management in construction projects. Advance Sustainable Science Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 1320
  9. Wibowo, M. A., Utomo, J. D., & Yinurullah, S. (2023). Perbandingan penggunaan variasi tipe bekisting ditinjau dari sisi biaya, mutu, waktu, dan waste pada pelaksanaan konstruksi gedung bertingkat di Indonesia. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 8(11).doi: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i11.13920
  10. Zakariyyah, M. M., & Prafitasiwi, A. G. (2024). Analisa perbandingan pemasangan bekisting konvensional dengan bekisting aluminium pada pekerjaan struktur gedung sekolah. Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, 1(1), 9–20.doi: 10.30587/jtsl.v1i1.7407

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.