skip to main content

Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Memutus Permohonan Perubahan Identitas Jenis Kelamin

*Ray Philip Basilica  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Ani Purwanti  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Muh. Afif Mahmud  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to examine the legal framework governing changes in the identity of transsexual individuals, the procedures required to apply for such identity changes, and the considerations of judges in deciding applications for identity changes submitted by transsexual individuals.

Methodology/Approach/Design: This research employs a socio-legal approach with a descriptive-analytical specification, supported by primary data obtained through interviews and secondary data derived from an analysis of court decisions.

Results and Discussion: The findings indicate that although there is no explicit regulation concerning transsexuality, population administration law provides a legal avenue for individuals to apply for changes in sex identity through judicial mechanisms. In practice, changes in sex as part of individual identity have not been expressly regulated in statutory provisions. Nevertheless, the population administration legal system provides a mechanism for the registration of other important events requiring court determinations, including changes in sex identity. In adjudicating such applications, judges base their considerations not only on normative legal aspects but also on non-legal aspects, such as religious, biological, psychological, and social factors attached to applicants seeking identity changes.

Practical Implications: This study has practical implications for the regulation of changes in sex identity as part of individual identity by accommodating non-legal factors, including the biological, psychological, and social aspects of applicants seeking identity changes.

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

  1. Afandi, F. (2022). Penelitian Hukum Interdisipliner Reza Banakar: Urgensi dan Desain Penelitian Sosio-legal. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.5.1.231-255
  2. Akadol, J. (2018). Budaya Hukum sebagai Faktor Pendorong Terwujudnya Reformasi Birokrasi Daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 7(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2018.v07.i01.p02
  3. Cahyono, I. T. (2008). Jadi, Kau Tak Merasa Bersalah!: Studi Kasus Diskriminasi dan Kekerasan terhadap LGBTI. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MKRI
  4. Friedman, L. M. (1977). The legal system: A social science perspective (Repr). Russell Sage Foundation
  5. Giulio, P. (2020). Gender dysphoria: Definitions, classifications, neurobiological profiles and clinical treatments. International Journal of Sexual and Reproductive Health Care, 3(1), 042–050
  6. Hidayatulloh, T., & Saumantri, T. (2023). The Harmony of Islam and Pancasila in Religious Discourse in Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Sosial Keagamaan Syekh Nurjati, 3(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.24235/sejati.v3i1.36
  7. Hurlock, E. B. (1997). Psikologi perkembangan: Suatu pendekatan sepanjang rentang kehidupan
  8. Prasetianingsih, R. (2016). Akuntabilitas Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Jurnal Konstitusi, 8(5), 829. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk858
  9. Rahardjo, S. (2006). Ilmu Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti
  10. Soerjono Soekanto. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers
  11. Sulistyowati, & Shidarta. (2011). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Konstelasi dan Refleksi. Yayasan Obor Indonesia
  12. Suteki, G. T., & Taufani, G. (2018). Metodologi penelitian hukum (filsafat, teori dan praktik). Depok: Rajawali Pers

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.