DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/pls.31281

Dekonstruksi Keadilan Digital: Konstruksi Hukum, Masyarakat, dan Teknologi di Era Revolusi Industri 5.0 di Indonesia

*Naufal Hasanuddin Djohan  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Objective: This study explores the complexities of law, society, and technology in the era of the Fifth Industrial Revolution, where data ownership determines knowledge and power in Indonesia.

Methodology/Approach/Design: Through a socio-legal approach, this study uncovers the symbolic meaning of society towards law and technology, aiming to deconstruct legal disorder and bridge the digital divide in Indonesia.

Results and Discussion: The study finds that Indonesia's legal system lags behind rapid technological advancements, leading to legal disorder and injustice. Therefore, three main efforts are proposed: (1) Implementing legal contextuality through Law 3.0 by utilizing blockchain technology and artificial intelligence for law enforcement; (2) Establishing an integrated legal framework to ensure inclusivity and equality; and (3) Promoting participatory justice to protect vulnerable groups and achieve digital justice for all Indonesian citizens.

Practical Implications: This study has practical implications for the Indonesian government to reconsider the new legal reality, which is deeply intertwined with technology. It is hoped that future regulations and legal policies will consider the role of technology in human society.

Novelty/Value: This study offers a novel contribution to the development of law in Indonesia by reflecting on the shifting legal reality and deconstructing digital justice in response to the potential of create injustice and inequality for Indonesian society.

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Relasi Patron – Client dalam Hubungan Kerja Germo dan PSK dalam Perspektif Socio – Legal Dekonstruksi Keadilan Digital: Konstruksi Hukum, Masyarakat, dan Teknologi di Era Revolusi Industri 5.0 di Indonesia Gagasan Creative Commons License sebagai Instrumen Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Pekerja Ekonomi Kreatif di Bidang Desain Grafis More recent articles
  1. Aitken, M. (2023). AI , Children’s Rights, & Wellbeing : Transnational Frameworks. The Alan Turing Institute, 1(November), 1
  2. Brownsword, R. (2022). Law, authority, and respect: three waves of technological disruption. Law, Innovation and Technology, 14(1), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2022.2047517
  3. Brownsword, R., & Somsen, H. (2021). Law, Innovation and Technology: Fast Forward to 2021. Law, Innovation and Technology, 13(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1898298
  4. Cisco. (2021). Digital Readiness Index. www.cisco.com. https://www.cisco.com/go/digitalreadiness2021
  5. Coelho, P., Bessa, C., Landeck, J., & Silva, C. (2022). Industry 5.0: The Arising of a Concept. Procedia Computer Science, 217(2022), 1137–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.312
  6. Creutzfeldt, N. (2019). Traditions of Studying the Social and the Legal. Routledge Handbook of Socio-Legal Theory and Methods, 9–34. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429952814-2
  7. Creutzfeldt, N., Mason, M., & Mc Connachie, K. (2020). Routledge Handbook of Socio-Legal Theory and Methods. In Routledge. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429952814-1
  8. Faisal. (2015). Menelusuri Teori Chaos dalam Hukum melalui Paradigma Critical Theory. Yustisia, 3(2)
  9. Febriani, A. S. & I. (2015). Sistem Hukum dan Teori Hukum Chaos. Hasanuddin Law Review, 1(2), 296–306
  10. Floridi, L. (2015). The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. In Springer Science (Vol. 64, Nomor 2). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1177/030089167806400201
  11. Frenz, W. (2022). Handbook Industry 4.0. In Springer Science. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64448-5
  12. Harari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens: Riwayat Singkat Umat Manusia (16 ed.). KPG
  13. Harari, Y. N. (2018). Why Technology Favors Tyranny. The Atlantic, 1(1)
  14. Hershock, P. D. (2020a). Ethics and the Risks of Intelligent Technology: The. Humane Artificial Intelligence: Working Paper Series, 3(May 2023), 26
  15. Hershock, P. D. (2020b). Humane Artificial Intelligence: Inequality, Social Cohesion and the Post Pandemic Acceleration of Intelligent Technology. Humane Artificial Intelligence: Working Paper Series, 1(1)
  16. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. (2024). Indeks Masyarakat Digital Indonesia. imdi.sdmdigital.id. https://imdi.sdmdigital.id/home_2023
  17. Khasri, M. R. K. (2020). Hermeneutic Circle in Digital Literation and its Relevance as an Antidote to Hoax. Informasi, 49(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v49i2.27981
  18. Knudsen, D. (2020). Elusive Boundaries, Power Relations, and Knowledge Production: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digitalization in Accouning. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 36, 100441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2019.100441
  19. Mahfud, M. A. (2020). The Relevance of Ronald Dworkin’s Theory for Creating Agrarian Justice in Indonesia. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 8(3), 389. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v8i3.27386
  20. Nguyen, H. O. A. T., Krishnan, P., Krishnaswamy, D., Usman, M., & Buyya, R. (2024). Quantum Cloud Computing: A Review, Open Problems, and Future Directions. Emerging Technology, 1(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.11420
  21. Nugroho, I. I., Pratiwi, R., Rahma, S., Zahro, A., Diponegoro, U., Zahro, A., Data, K., Regulatory, M., Guna, B., Journal, I. L., Penulis, I., & Hukum, M. (2021). Optimalisasi Penanggulangan Kebocoran Data Melalui Regulatory Blockchain Guna Mewujudkan Keamanan Siber di Indonesia. IPMHI Law Journal, 1(2), 115–129
  22. Rawindaran, N., Nawaf, L., Alarifi, S., Alghazzawi, D., Carroll, F., Katib, I., & Hewage, C. (2023). Enhancing Cyber Security Governance and Policy for SMEs in Industry 5 . 0 : A Comparative Study between Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom. Digital, 3(1), 200–231
  23. Riris Arhanariswari and Nursetiawan, E. (2022). Meaningful Participation in Legislative Drafting as a Manifestation of a Democratic Rule of Law. Jambe Law Journal, 5(2), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.5.2.251-270
  24. Silja Voeneky, Philipp Kellmeyer, Oliver Mueller, W. B. (2024). The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge University Press
  25. Strawn, G. O. (2021). Luciano Floridi : Mastermind of Information. IT Professional, 23(August), 119–121. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2021.3057244
  26. Taj, I., & Jhanjhi, N. Z. (2022). Towards Industrial Revolution 5.0 and Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, 12(1), 285–310. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijcds/120124
  27. Taulli, T. (2023). Generative AI : How ChatGPT and other AI tools will revolutionize business. Apress Berkeley
  28. Turkel, G. (1990). Michel Foucault : Law , Power , and Knowledge. Journal of Law and Society, 17(2), 170–193
  29. Weber, R. (2015). Principles for Governing the Internet. United Nations United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  30. WEF, W. E. F. (2023). The Global Risks Report 2023 - 18th Edition

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.