DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/pls.31279

Implikasi dari Misinterpretasi Konsep Ketertiban Umum terhadap Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Asing di Indonesia

*Netanya Angeline  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
FX Joko Priyono  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Nanik Trihastuti  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Objective: This research aims to analyze the implications of the misinterpretation of the concept of public order on the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Indonesia.

Methodology/Approach/Design: This study adopts a normative juridical approach by utilizing secondary data as a reference to provide a comprehensive understanding of this issue and offer recommendations to enhance the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Indonesia.

Results and Discussion: Judges possess absolute authority in interpreting the concept of public order. Although there is a clear definition of public order through jurisprudence and legislation, judges tend to exercise their authority more broadly, often disregarding the arbitration clauses agreed upon by the parties involved, thereby exceeding their authority.

Practical Implications: The practical implication for law enforcement in Indonesia is to enhance judges' prudent interpretation of the public order concept. This can be achieved through more intensive training and education on international arbitration principles, as well as reforms in judicial practices to ensure that judges make more consistent decisions and interpret according to existing theories.

Novelty/Value: This research provides insights into identifying the impact of the misinterpretation of the public order concept in the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Indonesia, particularly highlighting the efforts that law enforcement officials can undertake.

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Gagasan Creative Commons License sebagai Instrumen Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Pekerja Ekonomi Kreatif di Bidang Desain Grafis Dekonstruksi Keadilan Digital: Konstruksi Hukum, Masyarakat, dan Teknologi di Era Revolusi Industri 5.0 di Indonesia Relasi Patron – Client dalam Hubungan Kerja Germo dan PSK dalam Perspektif Socio – Legal More recent articles
  1. Ariprabowo, T., & Nazriyah, R. (2018). Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase oleh Pengadilan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(4), 701. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1441
  2. Azzanira, A., Y, A., & Syaifuddin, M. (2018). Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 3, 50. https://doi.org/10.32801/lamlaj.v3i1.59
  3. Cheng, T.-H., & Entchev, I. (2014). State Incapacity and Sovereign Immunity in International Arbitration. Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 26(August), 942
  4. Citra Bakti Pangaribuan. (2016). KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEPEMILIKAN PT. TELEVISI PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA (PT. TPI) YANG MEMUAT KLAUSUL ARBITRASE (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 238 PK/Pdt/2014). Jurnal Mercatoria, 9(1), 64–74
  5. Fan, G. (2012). Keberlakuan Putusan Provisi Arbitrase Internasional Mengenai Penghentian Gugatan (Anti-Suit Injunction) di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Astro Nusantara International BV Melawan PT Ayunda Prima Mitra). Universitas Indonesia
  6. Farsia, L., & Taufik, R. (2018). Penerapan Asas Ketertiban Umum terhadap Putusan Arbitrase Asing di Indonesia. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(3), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v20i3.11374
  7. Gautama, S. (2004). Arbitrase Luar Negeri dan Pemakaian Hukum Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti
  8. Hanif, S. F., & Ariani, R. F. (2022). Fair Legal Certainty In The Implementation Of International Arbitration Awards (A Socio Legal Study). Pattimura Law Journal, 6(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.47268/palau.v6i2.947
  9. Harahap, S. K. (2022). Penerapan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Dalam Penolakan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 7(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v7i1.707
  10. Harahap, Y. (2003). Arbitrase Ditinjau dari Reglemen Acara Perdata (Rv), Peraturan Prosedur BANI, International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award, Perm. Sinar Grafika
  11. Junita, F.-. (2015). ‘Pro Enforcement Bias’ Under Article V of the New York Convention in International Commercial Arbitration: Comparative Overview. Indonesia Law Review, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v5n2.150
  12. Longdong, T. L. (1998). Asas Ketertiban Umum dan Konvensi New York 1958. Citra Aditya Bakti
  13. Moses, M. L. (2024). The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (4 ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/9781009444750
  14. Nugroho, S. A. (2015). Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase dan Penerapan Hukumnya. Kencana
  15. Nurjanah, N. E., Jalal, F., & Supena, A. (2023). Studi Kasus Fatherless: Peran Ayah Dalam Pengasuhan Anak Usia Dini. Kumara Cendekia, 11(3), 261. https://doi.org/10.20961/kc.v11i3.77789
  16. Permatasari, Y., & , P. (2017). Kewenangan Pengadilan Dalam Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Di Indonesia. Jurnal Privat Law, 5(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v5i2.19384
  17. Prabhata, I. G. A. N. I. (2017). Kepastian Hukum Penolakan Eksekusi Putusan Arbitrase Asing Terhadap Investasi di Indonesia. Advokasi, 7, No. 2, 163–180
  18. Purwadi, A. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perdata Internasional. Pusat Pengkajian Hukum dan Pembangunan
  19. Ronzitti, N. (2015). Respect for Sovereignty , Use of Force and the Principle of Non- intervention in the Internal Affairs of Other States. European Leadership Network, 2625(1), 1
  20. Suteki & Taufani. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Filsafat Teori dan Praktik. Thafa Media
  21. Sutrisno, N. (1998). Pengakuan dan Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Asing di Indonesia: Analisis Permasalahan. Jurnal Hukum, 1(1)
  22. Vlahna, K., Krasniqi, D., Krasniqi, B., & Vlahna, D. (2020). Arbitration and the Importance of the Arbitration Agreement. European Journal of Educational and Social Sciences, 5(2), 160–169
  23. Wang, L., & Shan, W. (2022). Force Majeure and Investment Arbitration. ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal, 37(1–2), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siac014
  24. Winata, A. S. (2023). Ketidakpastian Hukum dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Internasional melalui Arbitrase Internasional di Indonesia. IBLAM Law Review, 3(1), 37–47
  25. Zora, Z. (2023). Konsep Public Order Dalam Hukum Perdata Internasional. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 6(4), 541. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v6i4.299

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.