DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/pls.31247

Pemaknaan Pasal Penghinaan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana: Telaah Paradigma Konstruktivisme

*Fachrial Rizky Syahputra  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Muh. Afif Mahfud  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Objective: This study aims to understand the interpretation of the phrase 'demeaning' in the Article on Insulting the President and Vice President in Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP).

Methodology/Approach/Design: This research is a non-doctrinal legal study using a socio-legal method, which conceptualizes law as symbolic meanings. The interpretation process of the Article on Insulting the President and Vice President in the Criminal Code is conducted through a paradigmatic review that presents an ontological, epistemological, and methodological understanding in a stratified, sequential, and relational manner.

Results and Discussion: The findings reveal that the existence of the Article on Insulting the President and Vice President holds the nature of Primus Interpares, and insult is considered a disgraceful act. The phrase 'demeaning' is interpreted as an action with negative connotations intended to degrade or attack a person's dignity so that freedom of speech and expression cannot be criminalized under the article on insulting the president.

Practical Implications: This research has implications for the practical reading and interpretation of the Article on Insulting the President and Vice President in the Criminal Code, especially when judges and/or other law enforcement officials engage in interpreting and handling cases related to this article.

Novelty/Value: This study offers novelty by presenting a subtle, sharp, and systematic analysis through a paradigmatic review and socio-legal method to explore the symbolic meanings embedded in the intentionality of each party interpreting the article.

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Gagasan Creative Commons License sebagai Instrumen Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Pekerja Ekonomi Kreatif di Bidang Desain Grafis Dekonstruksi Keadilan Digital: Konstruksi Hukum, Masyarakat, dan Teknologi di Era Revolusi Industri 5.0 di Indonesia Relasi Patron – Client dalam Hubungan Kerja Germo dan PSK dalam Perspektif Socio – Legal More recent articles
  1. Fitrah, F. A. (2021). Perbandingan Hukum terkait Pembentukan Pasal Penghinaan terhadap Peradilan, Perzinahan, dan Santet dalam RKUHP Indonesia. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i2.93
  2. Indarti, E. (2010). Diskresi dan Paradigma: Sebuah Telaah Filsafat Hukum. In Pidato Pengukuhan (Disampaikan Pada Upacara Penerimaan Jabatan Guru Besar dalam Penerimaan Jabatan Guru Besar dan Filsafat Hukum pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro) (hal. 11). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro
  3. Indarti, E. (2016). Bridging the Gaps : a Paradigmatic Insight Into Philosophy of Law. Diponegoro Law Review, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.1.1.2016.1-16
  4. Katimin, H., & Farida, I. (2020). Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Penerapan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pada Pasal Penghinaan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana yang Menjadi Polemik di Masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 8(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.25157/justisi.v8i1.3160
  5. Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., and Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences, Revisited. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications
  6. Lincoln, N. K. D. & Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. In NBER Working Papers. SAGE Publications
  7. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2016). The Constructivist Credo. In The Constructivist Credo. Left Coast Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315418810
  8. Mahfud, M. A., & Djohan, N. H. (2024). THE EXPANSION OF INVESTOR ACCESS TO CULTIVATION RIGHTS: A Socio-Legal Analysis on Agrarian Injustice in Indonesia. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 24(2), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v24i2.1500
  9. Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2006). Putusan Nomor Nomor 013-022/PUU-IV/2006. 60
  10. Marhaen, M., & Moansadok, E. (2024). The Principle of Material Legality in the Criminal Code : A Paradigmatic Review of the Normativity of Adat Law in the Indonesian Legal System. 16(04), 575–582
  11. Russell, B. (2004). History of Western Philosophy. Routledge
  12. Susanto, A. (2022). Perbandingan Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebelum Adanya RUU KUHP Pada RUU KUHP dan Sistem Dari Negara Belanda Agung. Jurnal Justisia, 7(1), 125–146

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.