skip to main content

Problematika Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia

*Abdhan Rahman Ainun Aly  -  Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Agustinus Diaz Alphanino Ananda  -  Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 Law, Development and Justice Review under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The development of creative economy financing policies that allow copyright to be used as an object of fiduciary security has raised legal issues when applied to Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs), which constitute communal intellectual property. This situation has generated debate regarding the compatibility of TCEs with the fundamental principles of security law, particularly concerning ownership, economic valuation, and enforcement. This study aims to analyze the legal status of TCEs as objects of fiduciary security based on the theory of security law and to examine the legal issues arising from their implementation. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches, with data analyzed descriptively and analytically. The findings reveal that copyright over TCEs does not satisfy the legal requirements of an object of fiduciary security because it lacks the proprietary element of eigendom, constitutes res extra commercium, and has the potential to conflict with public order (openbare orde) in the event of enforcement through public auction. Furthermore, the implementation of TCEs as fiduciary security encounters legal obstacles concerning the legal subject, as TCEs are communal intellectual property administered by the state, as well as the legal object due to the absence of financial valuation standards established by the Indonesian Society of Appraisers (MAPPI). This study contributes to the development of legal doctrine by emphasizing that the protection and utilization of TCEs within the fiduciary security framework require a dedicated sui generis regulatory regime to ensure legal certainty while preserving the communal nature of TCEs.

Keywords: Traditional Cultural Expression; Copyright; Fiduciary Guarantee

Article Metrics:

Article Info
  1. Afra, Fairuz dkk., 2023, Analisis Hukum Konsep Jaminan Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Kredit Jaminan Fidusia Di Indonesia, Diponegoro Private Law Review 6, No. 1: 59–72, https://doi.org/https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/dplr/article/view/18459
  2. Agustianto, Agustianto dkk., 2023, Upaya Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Berupa Hak Cipta Dalam Skema Pembiayaan Berbasis Kekayaan Intelektual, Jurnal Hukum Respublica 23, No. 1: 20–42, https://doi.org/10.31849/respublica.v23i01.17059
  3. Alfian, Irgi., 2025, Problematika Hukum Pemanfaatan Lagu dan/atau Musik sebagai Objek Jaminan Pembiayaan Perbankan di Era Ekonomi Kreatif, Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 6, No. 4 : 1-23 https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.990
  4. Badan Ekonomi Kreatif, Opus: Creative Economy Outlook (Badan Ekonomi Kreatif, 2019)
  5. Badriyah, Siti Malikhatun dkk., 2021, Implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision Regarding the Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees and Inclusion of Default Clauses in Indonesia, International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 10, No. 1: 33–38, https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.05
  6. Badriyah, Siti Malikhatun., 2015, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Dalam Penggunaan Base Transceifer Station (Bts) Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Kredit, Jurnal Media Hukum 22, No. 2: 205–17, https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2015.0056.205-217
  7. Bernika, Levina dan Monika, Anugerah Karta., 2024, Peran Ekonomi Kreatif Terhadap Perekonomian Indonesia Selama Pandemi Dengan Analisis Tabel Input-Output, Jurnal Ekonomi Indonesia 13, No. 3: 249–71, Indonesia, https://doi.org/10.52813/jei.v13i3.344
  8. Dewi, Cok Istri Dian Laksmi., 2019, Pengikatan Jaminan Kebendaan Dengan Fidusia, Jurnal Yustitia 13, No. 1: 15–25, https://doi.org/10.62279/yustitia.v13i1.265
  9. Eksploitasi Batik di Balik Viralnya Kemeja Aimé Leon Dore, kumparan, diakses 5 Maret 2026, https://kumparan.com/djaya-wiguna/eksploitasi-batik-di-balik-viralnya-kemeja-aime-leon-dore-272UNzYkfXl
  10. Fadilah. Afni Nur dkk., 2023, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Cipta Warisan Budaya Batik Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Hukum Internasional, Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 3, No. 5: 4322–31
  11. Fuady, Munir, 2026, Perkembangan Lembaga Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Teori dan Praktek, Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 22, No. 4: 323-333. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3070&context=jhp
  12. Hamka, Husnul,, 2023, Pemidanaan Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Persetujuan Penerima Fidusia, Philosophia Law Review 3, No. 1: 1–13, https://doi.org/10.56591/pilar.v3i1.19320
  13. Kamello, Kan., Hukum jaminan fidusia suatu kebutuhan yang didambakan (Bandung; Penerbit Alumni, 2022)
  14. Kansil, Christine S. T. dan Harjanto, Devy Yulyana., 2024, Perlindungan Hukum Atas Hak Moral Dan Hak Ekonomi Pencipta Terhadap Karya Cipta Yang Dijadikan Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia, Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Dan Riset Sosial Humaniora 4, No. 3: 332–44
  15. Komite Penyusun Standar Penilaian Indonesia, “Standar Penilaian Indonesia 320 Penilaian Aset Tak Berwujud,” KPSPI, 2022
  16. Koto, Ismail., 2023, Perkembangan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal Di Indonesia, Seminar Nasional Hukum, Sosial Dan Ekonomi 2, No. 1: 167–73, https://doi.org/https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/sanksi/article/view/14324
  17. Manuel, Elkristi Ferdinan., 2025, Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional (EBT) Dalam Bingkai Copying-Plagiarism: Resolution of Traditional Cultural Expression (TCE) Disputes in the Context of Copying and Plagiarism, Jurnal Media Hukum 13, No. 2: 289–302, https://doi.org/10.59414/jmh.v13i2.1047
  18. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud., Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi) (Jakarta; Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2013)
  19. Nugroho, Maria Christina Putri dan Salam, Abdul., 2024, Analisis Perbandingan Mekanisme Valuasi Hak Cipta Film sebagai Jaminan Fidusia pada Negara Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat, Lex Patrimonium 3, No. 2: 1–19, https://doi.org/https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/lexpatri/vol3/iss2/3/
  20. Nurdin, Rahmatullah dkk., 2025, Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Perlindungan EBT Dalam Hukum Indonesia Dan Internasional, Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Humaniora 2, No. 2: 384–93, https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v2i2.2080
  21. R, Subekti. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Cetakan ke-31 (Jakarta; Intermasa, 2003)
  22. Santoso, Djoko Hadi dan Sujatmiko, Agung., 2017, Royalti Hak Cipta Sebagai Obyek Jaminan Fidusia, Masalah-Masalah Hukum 46, No. 3: 198–204, https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.46.3.2017.198-204
  23. Sari, Anggri Puspita dkk., Ekonomi Kreatif (Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020)
  24. Sari, Nuzulia Kumala dan Mawardah, Dinda Agnis., 2021, Sistem Pendataan Kebudayaan Terpadu Alternatif Perlindungan Hukum Ekspresi Budaya Tradisonal, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 18, No. 3: 405–18, https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i3.823
  25. Sari, Putri Mayang., 2023, Problematika Valuasi Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia, UNES Law Review 6, No. 2: 5307–20, https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1361
  26. Sari, Rany Kartika., 2016, Hak Cipta sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia, Lex Renaissance 1, No. 2: 293–306, https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol1.iss2.art10
  27. Sofwan, Sri Soedewi Masjchoen. Hukum Perdata: Hukum Benda (Yogyakarta; Liberty, 1981)
  28. Wahyu, Alifa Achmad dkk., 2024, Aspek Kepastian Hukum Dalam Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia, Binamulia Hukum 13, No. 2: 429–45, https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i2.935
  29. Wahyufi, Aderista Tri dan Karim., 2022, Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Hak Cipta Sinematografi Terhadap Pelanggaran Dalam Streaming Gratis Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014, Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan 9, No. 1: 107-124, https://doi.org/https://ejournal.fh.ubhara.ac.id/index.php/judiciary/article/view/78
  30. Widjaja, Gunawan dan Yani, Ahmad., Jaminan Fidusia, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007)
  31. World Intellectual Property Organization, 2005., Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions/Folklore - Booklet N° 1, Booklet, no. 1 (World Intellectual Property Organization, https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.28589
  32. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
  33. Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Beserta Benda-Benda yang Berkaitan dengan Tanah
  34. Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia
  35. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris juncto Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004
  36. Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta
  37. Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2019 tentang Ekonomi Kreatif
  38. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2019 tentang Ekonomi Kreatif
  39. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 56 Tahun 2022 tentang Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.