Kedudukan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional (EBT) Sebagai Obyek Jaminan Fidusia dan Problematika Hukumnya

Abdhan Rahman Ainun Aly; Agustinus Diaz Alphanino Ananda

doi:10.14710/ldjr.9.2026.206-225

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.9.2026.206-225

Kedudukan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional (EBT) Sebagai Obyek Jaminan Fidusia dan Problematika Hukumnya

*Abdhan Rahman Ainun Aly - Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

Agustinus Diaz Alphanino Ananda - Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{LDJR32035,
    author = {Abdhan Aly and Agustinus Diaz Alphanino Ananda},
    title = {Kedudukan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional (EBT) Sebagai Obyek Jaminan Fidusia dan Problematika Hukumnya},
    journal = {Law,  Development and Justice Review},
  volume = {9},
    number = {2},
    year = {2026},
    keywords = {Traditional Cultural Expression; Copyright; Fiduciary Guarantee},
    abstract = {    The development of creative economy financing policies, in relation to the use of copyright as an object of fiduciary guarantee, raises legal issues when applied to traditional cultural expressions (EBT). This condition has given rise to debate regarding the suitability of EBT with the principles of guarantee law, especially regarding ownership, economic valuation, and implementation of execution. This study aims to analyze the position of EBT as an object of fiduciary guarantee based on the theory of guarantee law, as well as to examine its implementation and legal problems. The benefit is that it can strengthen the legal position of EBT as an object of fiduciary guarantee. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory regulatory approach and a conceptual approach analyzed descriptively-analystically. The results show that copyright on EBT does not meet the characteristics of an object of fiduciary guarantee because it does not fulfill the material element in the form of ownership rights (eigendom), has the character of res extra commercium, and has the potential to conflict with public order (openbare orde) in the implementation of execution. Furthermore, the implementation of renewable energy as a fiduciary guarantee object faces obstacles in terms of legal subjects, as it is a communal asset managed by the state, and in terms of objects, due to the lack of financial valuation standards from the Indonesian Society of Appraisers (MAPPI). Therefore, it is crucial for the House of Representatives (DPR) to establish specific,   sui generis regulations to ensure legal certainty and protect the communal character of renewable energy, thereby providing protection for the community.    },
   issn = {2655-1942},   pages = {206--225}  doi = {10.14710/ldjr.9.2026.206-225},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/lj/article/view/32035}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

The development of creative economy financing policies, in relation to the use of copyright as an object of fiduciary guarantee, raises legal issues when applied to traditional cultural expressions (EBT). This condition has given rise to debate regarding the suitability of EBT with the principles of guarantee law, especially regarding ownership, economic valuation, and implementation of execution. This study aims to analyze the position of EBT as an object of fiduciary guarantee based on the theory of guarantee law, as well as to examine its implementation and legal problems. The benefit is that it can strengthen the legal position of EBT as an object of fiduciary guarantee. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory regulatory approach and a conceptual approach analyzed descriptively-analystically. The results show that copyright on EBT does not meet the characteristics of an object of fiduciary guarantee because it does not fulfill the material element in the form of ownership rights (eigendom), has the character of res extra commercium, and has the potential to conflict with public order (openbare orde) in the implementation of execution. Furthermore, the implementation of renewable energy as a fiduciary guarantee object faces obstacles in terms of legal subjects, as it is a communal asset managed by the state, and in terms of objects, due to the lack of financial valuation standards from the Indonesian Society of Appraisers (MAPPI). Therefore, it is crucial for the House of Representatives (DPR) to establish specific, sui generis regulations to ensure legal certainty and protect the communal character of renewable energy, thereby providing protection for the community.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues

Keywords: Traditional Cultural Expression; Copyright; Fiduciary Guarantee

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : ID

In Vol 9, No 2 (2026): Law, Development & Justice Review (In Press)

Afra, Fairuz dkk., 2023, Analisis Hukum Konsep Jaminan Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Kredit Jaminan Fidusia Di Indonesia, Diponegoro Private Law Review 6, No. 1: 59–72, https://doi.org/https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/dplr/article/view/18459
Agustianto, Agustianto dkk., 2023, Upaya Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Berupa Hak Cipta Dalam Skema Pembiayaan Berbasis Kekayaan Intelektual, Jurnal Hukum Respublica 23, No. 1: 20–42, https://doi.org/10.31849/respublica.v23i01.17059
Alfian, Irgi., 2025, Problematika Hukum Pemanfaatan Lagu dan/atau Musik sebagai Objek Jaminan Pembiayaan Perbankan di Era Ekonomi Kreatif, Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 6, No. 4 : 1-23 https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.990
Badan Ekonomi Kreatif, Opus: Creative Economy Outlook (Badan Ekonomi Kreatif, 2019)
Badriyah, Siti Malikhatun dkk., 2021, Implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision Regarding the Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees and Inclusion of Default Clauses in Indonesia, International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 10, No. 1: 33–38, https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.05
Badriyah, Siti Malikhatun., 2015, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Dalam Penggunaan Base Transceifer Station (Bts) Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Kredit, Jurnal Media Hukum 22, No. 2: 205–17, https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2015.0056.205-217
Bernika, Levina dan Monika, Anugerah Karta., 2024, Peran Ekonomi Kreatif Terhadap Perekonomian Indonesia Selama Pandemi Dengan Analisis Tabel Input-Output, Jurnal Ekonomi Indonesia 13, No. 3: 249–71, Indonesia, https://doi.org/10.52813/jei.v13i3.344
Dewi, Cok Istri Dian Laksmi., 2019, Pengikatan Jaminan Kebendaan Dengan Fidusia, Jurnal Yustitia 13, No. 1: 15–25, https://doi.org/10.62279/yustitia.v13i1.265
Eksploitasi Batik di Balik Viralnya Kemeja Aimé Leon Dore, kumparan, diakses 5 Maret 2026, https://kumparan.com/djaya-wiguna/eksploitasi-batik-di-balik-viralnya-kemeja-aime-leon-dore-272UNzYkfXl
Fadilah. Afni Nur dkk., 2023, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Cipta Warisan Budaya Batik Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Hukum Internasional, Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 3, No. 5: 4322–31
Fuady, Munir, 2026, Perkembangan Lembaga Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Teori dan Praktek, Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 22, No. 4: 323-333. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3070&context=jhp
Hamka, Husnul,, 2023, Pemidanaan Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Persetujuan Penerima Fidusia, Philosophia Law Review 3, No. 1: 1–13, https://doi.org/10.56591/pilar.v3i1.19320
Kamello, Kan., Hukum jaminan fidusia suatu kebutuhan yang didambakan (Bandung; Penerbit Alumni, 2022)
Kansil, Christine S. T. dan Harjanto, Devy Yulyana., 2024, Perlindungan Hukum Atas Hak Moral Dan Hak Ekonomi Pencipta Terhadap Karya Cipta Yang Dijadikan Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia, Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Dan Riset Sosial Humaniora 4, No. 3: 332–44
Komite Penyusun Standar Penilaian Indonesia, “Standar Penilaian Indonesia 320 Penilaian Aset Tak Berwujud,” KPSPI, 2022
Koto, Ismail., 2023, Perkembangan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal Di Indonesia, Seminar Nasional Hukum, Sosial Dan Ekonomi 2, No. 1: 167–73, https://doi.org/https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/sanksi/article/view/14324
Manuel, Elkristi Ferdinan., 2025, Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional (EBT) Dalam Bingkai Copying-Plagiarism: Resolution of Traditional Cultural Expression (TCE) Disputes in the Context of Copying and Plagiarism, Jurnal Media Hukum 13, No. 2: 289–302, https://doi.org/10.59414/jmh.v13i2.1047
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud., Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi) (Jakarta; Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2013)
Nugroho, Maria Christina Putri dan Salam, Abdul., 2024, Analisis Perbandingan Mekanisme Valuasi Hak Cipta Film sebagai Jaminan Fidusia pada Negara Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat, Lex Patrimonium 3, No. 2: 1–19, https://doi.org/https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/lexpatri/vol3/iss2/3/
Nurdin, Rahmatullah dkk., 2025, Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Perlindungan EBT Dalam Hukum Indonesia Dan Internasional, Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Humaniora 2, No. 2: 384–93, https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v2i2.2080
R, Subekti. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Cetakan ke-31 (Jakarta; Intermasa, 2003)
Santoso, Djoko Hadi dan Sujatmiko, Agung., 2017, Royalti Hak Cipta Sebagai Obyek Jaminan Fidusia, Masalah-Masalah Hukum 46, No. 3: 198–204, https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.46.3.2017.198-204
Sari, Anggri Puspita dkk., Ekonomi Kreatif (Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020)
Sari, Nuzulia Kumala dan Mawardah, Dinda Agnis., 2021, Sistem Pendataan Kebudayaan Terpadu Alternatif Perlindungan Hukum Ekspresi Budaya Tradisonal, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 18, No. 3: 405–18, https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i3.823
Sari, Putri Mayang., 2023, Problematika Valuasi Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia, UNES Law Review 6, No. 2: 5307–20, https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1361
Sari, Rany Kartika., 2016, Hak Cipta sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia, Lex Renaissance 1, No. 2: 293–306, https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol1.iss2.art10
Sofwan, Sri Soedewi Masjchoen. Hukum Perdata: Hukum Benda (Yogyakarta; Liberty, 1981)
Wahyu, Alifa Achmad dkk., 2024, Aspek Kepastian Hukum Dalam Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia, Binamulia Hukum 13, No. 2: 429–45, https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i2.935
Wahyufi, Aderista Tri dan Karim., 2022, Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Hak Cipta Sinematografi Terhadap Pelanggaran Dalam Streaming Gratis Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014, Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan 9, No. 1: 107-124, https://doi.org/https://ejournal.fh.ubhara.ac.id/index.php/judiciary/article/view/78
Widjaja, Gunawan dan Yani, Ahmad., Jaminan Fidusia, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007)
World Intellectual Property Organization, 2005., Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions/Folklore - Booklet N° 1, Booklet, no. 1 (World Intellectual Property Organization, https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.28589
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Beserta Benda-Benda yang Berkaitan dengan Tanah
Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris juncto Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004
Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2019 tentang Ekonomi Kreatif
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2019 tentang Ekonomi Kreatif
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 56 Tahun 2022 tentang Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to LDJR and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.

LDJR and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in MMH journal are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.

(Penulis yang mengirimkan naskah melakukannya dengan pengertian bahwa jika diterima untuk publikasi, hak cipta artikel tersebut akan diberikan kepada LDJR dan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro sebagai penerbit jurnal. Hak cipta mencakup hak untuk mereproduksi dan mengirimkan artikel dalam semua bentuk dan media, termasuk cetak ulang, foto, mikrofilm, dan reproduksi serupa lainnya, serta terjemahannya. LDJR dan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro dan Editor berusaha keras untuk memastikan bahwa tidak ada data, pendapat, atau pernyataan yang salah atau menyesatkan dipublikasikan di jurnal. Dengan cara apa pun, isi artikel dan iklan yang diterbitkan dalam jurnal MMH adalah tanggung jawab masing-masing penulis dan pengiklan.)