BibTex Citation Data :
@article{LDJR28964, author = {Dinda Bhawika Wimala Pastika and Eka Pala Suryana and Muhammad Rizal and Firdaus Ayu Palestina}, title = {Analisis Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Pemerintah Dalam Pemberlakuan Kewajiban Iuran TAPERA (Tabungan Perumahan Rakyat)}, journal = {Law, Development and Justice Review}, volume = {8}, number = {2}, year = {2025}, keywords = {Public Housing Savings; Legal Protection; Workers}, abstract = { New legal products as well as amendments to existing regulations consistently influence the labor sector. One such example is the mandatory contribution to the Public Housing Savings (TAPERA), regulated under Government Regulation No. 21 of 2024 concerning Amendments to Government Regulation No. 25 of 2020, as a derivative regulation of Law No. 4 of 2016 on Public Housing Savings. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of government policy implementation related to the mandatory TAPERA contributions that must be fulfilled by workers. The research method employed is normative juridical, using both conceptual and statutory approaches. The findings indicate that the implementation of mandatory TAPERA contributions has not been fully effective. From a regulatory perspective, there are still overlaps with labor and social security regulations, creating legal uncertainty. From an implementation perspective, the contribution collection mechanism has not been well integrated into the labor administration system, thus causing technical obstacles. Furthermore, the low level of public understanding and trust in TAPERA affects worker participation. Therefore, although TAPERA has a strong legal foundation, its effectiveness requires regulatory improvement, transparent management, accountable supervision, and adequate legal protection for participants. Moving forward, effectiveness can only be achieved if the policy is implemented consistently and in a coordinated manner, accompanied by continuous public outreach and institutional strengthening as the foundation for implementation. }, issn = {2655-1942}, pages = {195--214} doi = {10.14710/ldjr.8.2025.195-214}, url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/lj/article/view/28964} }
Refworks Citation Data :
New legal products as well as amendments to existing regulations consistently influence the labor sector. One such example is the mandatory contribution to the Public Housing Savings (TAPERA), regulated under Government Regulation No. 21 of 2024 concerning Amendments to Government Regulation No. 25 of 2020, as a derivative regulation of Law No. 4 of 2016 on Public Housing Savings. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of government policy implementation related to the mandatory TAPERA contributions that must be fulfilled by workers. The research method employed is normative juridical, using both conceptual and statutory approaches. The findings indicate that the implementation of mandatory TAPERA contributions has not been fully effective. From a regulatory perspective, there are still overlaps with labor and social security regulations, creating legal uncertainty. From an implementation perspective, the contribution collection mechanism has not been well integrated into the labor administration system, thus causing technical obstacles. Furthermore, the low level of public understanding and trust in TAPERA affects worker participation. Therefore, although TAPERA has a strong legal foundation, its effectiveness requires regulatory improvement, transparent management, accountable supervision, and adequate legal protection for participants. Moving forward, effectiveness can only be achieved if the policy is implemented consistently and in a coordinated manner, accompanied by continuous public outreach and institutional strengthening as the foundation for implementation.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to LDJR and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
LDJR and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in MMH journal are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
(Penulis yang mengirimkan naskah melakukannya dengan pengertian bahwa jika diterima untuk publikasi, hak cipta artikel tersebut akan diberikan kepada LDJR dan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro sebagai penerbit jurnal. Hak cipta mencakup hak untuk mereproduksi dan mengirimkan artikel dalam semua bentuk dan media, termasuk cetak ulang, foto, mikrofilm, dan reproduksi serupa lainnya, serta terjemahannya. LDJR dan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro dan Editor berusaha keras untuk memastikan bahwa tidak ada data, pendapat, atau pernyataan yang salah atau menyesatkan dipublikasikan di jurnal. Dengan cara apa pun, isi artikel dan iklan yang diterbitkan dalam jurnal MMH adalah tanggung jawab masing-masing penulis dan pengiklan.)
Diterbitkan Oleh:
Diponegoro Law Firm, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro Bekerjasama dengan DPC PERADI Semarang.
DLF, Gedung PKM Lt. 1. Jl. A. Suroyo, Gd Prof. Purwahid Patrik, Tembalang-Semarang
Email: diponegorolawfirm@live.undip.ac.id Telp. 024-76918201 Fax. 024-76918206 View My Stats