Manfaat Pengembangan Desa Wisata Wonolopo terhadap Kondisi Sosial, Ekonomi dan Lingkungan Masyarakat Lokal

*Yessi Fitari  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota,, Indonesia
Samsul Ma'rif  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota,, Indonesia
Received: 27 Dec 2016; Published: 27 Mar 2017.
Open Access
Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: ID
Full Text:
Statistics: 850 3134

Abstract

Wonolopo Tourism Village is one of tourism village destinations in Semarang City.  It has three types of tourism attractions, i.e. agro-tourism, local industry and culinary, and educational tourism. The tourism potentials need to be developed to generate more benefits for the local community. The study aims to determine the benefits of the development in Wonolopo Tourism Village on social, economic, and environmental conditions of the local community. This study was conducted using both quantitative and qualitative methods through the analysis of product components of tourism village to find out the strengths and weaknesses in the development of tourism products in Wonolopo, and Anova analysis to determine the alteration of local community condition due to the tourism village development. The results show that the development of Wonolopo Tourism Village has moderate impact on the social, economic and environmental aspects to the local community. In the social aspect, the artistic potential had increasingly to be preserved and become the local wisdom. In the economic aspect, the development of tourism village has increased the local livelihood and local business opportunity. In the environmental aspect, the tourism village has improved the village infrastructures and accessibility condition.

Keywords
tourism village; tourism village benefit; local communities; tourism village development

Article Metrics:

  1. BPS Kota Semarang. (2014). Katalog BPS : 4101002.3374 Indikator kesejahteraan rakyat Kota Semarang 2014. Kota Semarang: Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Semarang.
  2. BPS Kota Semarang. (2015). Kecamatan Mijen dalam angka 2015. Kota Semarang: Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Semarang.
  3. Chang, K. C., Hwung, H. H., & Chuang, C. T. (2012). An exploration of stakeholder conflict over the Taiwanese Marine Protected Area. Ocean and Coastal Management, 55, 36-41. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.10.008.
  4. Choi, H. C., & Sirakaya, E. (2006). Sustainability indicators for managing community tourism. Tourism Management, 27(6), 1274–1289. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2005.05.018.
  5. Dyer, P., Gursoy, D., Sharma, B., & Carter, J. (2007). Structural modeling of resident perceptions of tourism and associated development on the Sunshine Coast, Australia. Tourism Management, 28, 409–422. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2006.04.002.
  6. Damanik, J., & Weber, H. F. (2006). Perencanaan ekowisata: Dari teori ke aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Andi.
  7. Dewi, M. H. U., Fandeli, C., & Baiquni, M. (2013). Pengembangan desa wisata berbasis partisipasi masyarakat lokal di Desa Wisata Jatiluwih Tabanan, Bali. Kawistara, 3(2), 117-226.
  8. Hadiwijoyo, S. S. (2012). Perencanaan pariwisata perdesaan berbasis masyarakat: Sebuah pendekatan konsep. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  9. Jimura, T. (2011). The impact of world heritage site designation on local communities - A case study of Ogimachi, Shirakawa-mura, Japan. Tourism Management, 32(2), 288-296. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.02.005.
  10. Kim, K., Uysal, M., & Sirgy, M. J. (2013). How does tourism in a community impact the quality of life of community residents? Tourism Management, 36, 527-540. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2012.09.005.
  11. Kumar, C. P., Sakthivel, R., & Ramanathan, H. N. (2013). Local Residents Perception and Attitude Towards Model Tourism Village Kumbalangy Kerala. Journal of Contemporary Research in Management, 8(1), 59-67.
  12. Munir, R., & Fitanto, B. (2005). Pengembangan ekonomi lokal partisipatif: Masalah, kebijakan, dan panduan pelaksanaan kegiatan. Jakarta: Local Governance Support Program, USAID.
  13. Nuryanti, W. (1993). Concept, perspective, and challenges. Konferensi Internasional mengenai Pariwisata Budaya. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
  14. Nusastiawan, C. D. (2010). Pedoman umum pengembangan Desa Wisata Cirangkong tahap awal. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/6423956/Buku_Pedoman_Umum_Desa_Wisata.
  15. Pemerintah Kota Semarang. (2011). Peraturan Daerah Kota Semarang Nomor 14 Tahun 2011 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Semarang Tahun 2011-2031. Kota Semarang: Kantor Pemerintah Kota Semarang.
  16. Pemerintah Kota Semarang. (2012). Surat Keputusan Walikota Semarang Nomor 556/407 Tanggal 21 Desember 2012 Tentang Penetapan Kelurahan Wonolopo Kecamatan Mijen sebagai Desa Wisata Kota Semarang berbasis Daya Tarik Alam dan Daya Tarik Budaya. 2012. Semarang: Kantor Pemerintah Kota Semarang.
  17. Suarthana, I. K., Madiun, N., Moeljadi, M., & Yuniarsa, S. O. (2015). Exploring the community participation, tourism village, and social-economic to environment impact (Case Study: Pentingsari Village, Yogyakarta). International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 4(9), 85-90.
  18. Tsundoda, T., & Mendlinger, S. (2009). Economic and social impact of tourism on a small town: Peterborough New Hampshire. J. Service Science & Management, 2, 61-70.
  19. Timothy, D. J. (1998). Cooperative tourism planning in a developing destination. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 6(1), 52–68. doi:10.1080/09669589808667301.
  20. Widiyanto, D., Handoyo, J. P., & Fajarwati, A. (2008). Pengembangan pariwisata perdesaan (Suatu usulan strategi bagi Desa Wisata Ketingan). Bumi Lestari, 8(2), 205-210.
  21. Xu, S., Barbieri, C., Anderson, D., Leung, Y. F., & Rozier-Rich, S. (2016). Residents' perceptions of wine tourism development. Tourism Management, 55, 276-286. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2016.02.016.