Analisis Keberlanjutan Pembangunan Kota Tepian Pantai (Studi Kasus: Kota Baubau Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.5.3.188-204

Article Metrics: (Click on the Metric tab below to see the detail)

Article Info
Published: 29-12-2017
Section: Articles
In Vol 5, No 3 (2017): December 2017
Fulltext PDF Tell your colleagues Email the author
The complexity of coastal development in Baubau City needs to be anticipated carefully for hindering coastal ecosystems sustainability away from disruptions and threats. Environmental degradation resulted from developments could be disastrous to economic and infrastructure sectors as well as human lives. Therefore, development initiatives are supposed to comply with the principles of sustainable development. Accordingly, sustainability analysis is necessary to figure out the sustainability status of Baubau City development. The purpose of this study is to analyze the sustainability of Baubau City development in accordance with multidimensional measurement of ecological, economic, social, infrastructure and technology, and law and institution. The data used in this study include primary and secondary data obtained through literature studies, expert discussions/stakeholder, interviews, questionnaires, and field surveys. The sustainability analysis applies multidimensional scaling, leverage, Pareto, and Monte Carlo techniques. The results show that Baubau City is quite sustainable in technological infrastructure dimension (74,77), and institutional law dimension (65,87), but less sustainable in ecology dimension (32,90) and economic dimension (41,87), and unsustainable in social dimension (20,61). In addition, there are 35 sensitive attributes affecting the sustainability of Baubau City development.

Keywords

ecology; economy; law and institution; infrastructure and technology; sustainability; social

  1. Suparman Supardi 
    Politeknik Baubau, Baubau, Indonesia
    Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Pesisir dan Lautan
  2. Sigid Hariyadi 
    Departemen Manajemen Sumber Daya Perairan, Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia
  3. Achmad Fahrudin 
    Departemen Manajemen Sumber Daya Perairan, Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia
  1. Badan Pengendalian Dampak Lingkungan Daerah Kota Baubau. (2016). Laporan Status Lingkungan Hidup Kota Baubau Tahun 2016. Baubau.
  2. Badan Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Daerah Kota Baubau. (2015). Buku Data Kota Baubau. Baubau: Badan Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Daerah Kota Baubau.
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Baubau. (2016). Statistik Daerah Kota Baubau 2016. Baubau: Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Baubau.
  4. Bohari, R. (2010). Model Kebijakan Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir Secara Terpadu dan Berkelanjutan di Pantai Makassar Sulawesi Selatan. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  5. Brundtland Commission. (1987). Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. The World Commission on Environment and Development (Vol. 4). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Dahuri, R. (2003). Keanekaragaman Hayati Laut Aset Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  7. Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Kota Baubau. (2014). Laporan Akhir Penyusunan Dokumen Rencana Strategis (Renstra) Wilayah Pesisir dan Laut Kota Baubau 2014-2034. Baubau.
  8. Effendi, M. (2009). Pengelolaan wilayah pesisir secara terpadu: Solusi pemanfaatan ruang, pemanfaatan sumber daya dan pemanfaatan kapasitas asimilasi wilayah pesisir yang optimal dan berkelanjutan. Jurnal Kelautan, 2(1), 81–86. Retrieved from http://journal.trunojoyo.ac.id/jurnalkelautan/article/view/906/0.
  9. Fahimuddin, M. M., Barus, B., & Mulatsih, S. (2016). Analisis daya dukung lahan di Kota Baubau, Sulawesi Tenggara. Tata Loka, 18(3), 183–196. doi: 10.14710/tataloka.18.3.183-196.
  10. Fahmi, F., Sitorus, S. R. P., & Fauzi, A. (2016). Evaluasi pemanfaatan penggunaan lahan berbasis rencana pola ruang Kota Baubau, Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara. Tata Loka, 18(1), 27–39. doi: 10.14710/tataloka.18.1.27-39.
  11. Fauzi, A., & Anna, S. (2002). Evaluasi status berkelanjutan pembangunan perikanan, aplikasi RAPFISH, Studi Kasus Perairan Pesisir DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Pesisir dan Lautan, 4(3), 43–55.
  12. Jamilah, J. (2013). Analisis kesesuaian lahan dan daya dukung lingkungan untuk budidaya rumput laut di perairan Baubau. Jurnal Biology Science & Education, 2(1), 103–108. Retrieved from http://ejurnal.lp2m-iainambon.id/index.php/biosel/article/view/244.
  13. Kavanagh, P. (2001). Rapid Appraisal of Fisheries (RAPFISH) Project. RAPFISH Software Description (For Microsoft Excel. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
  14. Kavanagh, P. F., & Pitcher, T. J. (2004). Implementing Microsoft Excel Software for Rapfish: A Technique for the Rapid Appraisal of Fisheries Status. Canada: Fisheries Centre University of British Columbia.
  15. Kay, R., & Alder, ‎Jaqueline. (1999). Coastal Planning and Management. New York: Routledge.
  16. La Sara. (2014). Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir: Gagasan Memelihara Aset Wilayah Pesisir dan Solusi Pembangunan Bangsa. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  17. Laras, B. K., Marimin, M., Nurjaya, I. W., & Budiharso, S. (2011). Dimensi keberlanjutan pengelolaan Kota Tepian Pantai (Studi Kasus Kota Semarang). Forum Pascasarjana, 34(2), 89–105. Retrieved from https://www.google.co.id/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjBmr3IlIHYAhVHq48KHTC7Dx8QFggmMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.portalgaruda.org%2Farticle.php%3Farticle%3D86274%26val%3D245%26title%3DHandling%2520Operation%2520Sustainability%2520(Case%2520Study%3A%2520Semarang%2520Waterfront)&usg=AOvVaw2wUwryrFMJb6R9Y28npAgZ.
  18. Lubis, J. (2011). Mewujudkan pembangunan Kota Pesisir di Indonesia yang berkelanjutan melalui penyediaan infrastruktur berbasis penataan ruang. In Buletin Tata Ruang BKPRN Edisi Juli-Agustus (Pembangunan). Jakarta: Badan Koordinasi Penataan Ruang Nasional.
  19. Pitcher, T. J., & Preikshot, D. (2001). RAPFISH: A rapid appraisal technique to evaluate the sustainability status of fisheries. Fisheries Research, 49(3), 255–270. doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(00)00205-8.
  20. Rizal, A. (2013). Disparitas pembangunan wilayah pesisir (Studi Kasus Kabupaten Tasikmalaya). Jurnal Akuatika, IV(2), 115–130. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/akuatika/article/download/3144/2405.
  21. Santoso, L., Patandiana, M. V., & Faiza, F. (2012). Identifikasi potensi wisata pantai di Kota Baubau. In Prosiding Group Teknik Arsitektur (Vol. 6, pp. 978–979). Makassar: Jurusan Teknik Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik Universitas Hasanuddin. Retrieved from https://www.google.co.id/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjOnO7imIHYAhXLRo8KHXMnB_AQFggmMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.portalgaruda.org%2Farticle.php%3Farticle%3D94528%26val%3D2170&usg=AOvVaw15UQxdFO41hrIKr3LEse-T.
  22. Sudarya, D., Sitorus, S. R. P., & Firdaus, M. (2013). Analisis perkembangan ekonomi wilayah untuk arahan pembangunan kecamatan di wilayah pesisir Kabupaten Garut. Jurnal Ilmiah Geomatika, 19(2), 134–140. Retrieved from http://jurnal.big.go.id/index.php/GM/article/view/20.7
  23. Wibowo, G. D. H. (2009). Aspek hukum dan kelembagaan dalam peningkatan efisiensi dan efektifitas pengelolaan wilayah pesisir. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 16(1), 127–144. doi: 10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss1.art8.