skip to main content

Opportunities Following the Path to Sustainability at Universidad San Francisco de Quito

*Camila Espinoza orcid  -  Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Ecuador
Juan Proano-Alives  -  Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Ecuador
Open Access Copyright 2024 Journal of Sustainability Perspectives

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Since 2013, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ) has utilized various global and national sustainability assessment tools, including STARS by AASHE, UI Green Metrics, Q.S. Sustainability, and THE Impact Ranking. These tools have been pivotal in diagnosing institutional strengths and weaknesses, identifying opportunities for improvement, and integrating strategic actions into our policies and institutional plans. This paper explores the comparative effectiveness of these diverse sustainability evaluation tools and analyzes their impact on decision-making processes at USFQ. It explores how these assessments have informed our sustainability policies and strategies over the years, leading to significant improvements within our institution. Additionally, the paper presents successful case studies from USFQ where these tools have directly influenced the implementation of various projects. The insights provided will demonstrate how rigorous assessments can pave the way for meaningful institutional enhancements, offering a valuable resource for academic institutions worldwide to foster a culture of sustainability and make informed decisions that drive institutional change towards greater sustainability.

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

  1. Aboodi, B. (2019). The Role Of Continuous Improvement Of University Education Using The Deming Model In Supporting Com-petitive Advantage/Exploratory Research On The Middle Technical University/Baghdad. Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 20, 1058–1081
  2. Angelaki, M. E., Bersimis, F., Karvounidis, T., & Douligeris, C. (2024). Towards more sustainable higher education institutions: Implementing the sustainable development goals and embedding sustainability into the information and computer technology curricula. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 29, Issue 4). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12025-8
  3. Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (n.d.). Participants & Reports. Retrieved from https://reports.aashe.org/institutions/participants-and-reports/
  4. Cardin, M. (2017). Antonella Basso, Marta and Chiara Mio Sustainability indicators for university ranking. 18
  5. Chankseliani, M., & McCowan, T. (2021). Higher education and the Sustainable Development Goals. In Higher Education (Vol. 81, Issue 1). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00652-w
  6. Garnåsjordet, P. A., Aslaksen, I., Giampietro, M., Funtowicz, S., & Ericson, T. (2012). Sustainable Development Indicators: From Statistics to Policy. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(5), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1597
  7. Machado, C. F., & Davim, J. P. (2023). Sustainability in the Modernization of Higher Education: Curricular Transformation and Sustainable Campus—A Literature Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118615
  8. Muñoz-Suárez, M., Guadalajara, N., & Osca, J. M. (2020a). A comparative analysis between global university rankings and environmental sustainability of universities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(14), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145759
  9. Muñoz-Suárez, M., Guadalajara, N., & Osca, J. M. (2020b). A comparative analysis between global university rankings and environmental sustainability of universities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(14), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145759
  10. Pacheco, J. A. B., Teijeiro-álvarez, M. M., & García-álvarez, M. T. (2020). Sustainable development in the economic, environmental, and social fields of ecuadorian universities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12187384
  11. QS Quacquarelli Symonds (2024). Q.S. World University Rankings: Sustainability 2024. Retrieved from https://www.topuniversities.com/sustainability-rankings
  12. Riba Romeva, C. (2002). Diseño concurrente. In Diseño concurrente. https://doi.org/10.5821/ebook-9788498800746
  13. Shaw, K. (2012). Northumbria Research Link (www.northumbria.ac.uk/nrl). Academy of Management, 51(September), 1–51
  14. Times Higher Education (n.d.). Times Higher Education University Impact Rankings. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/impactrankings
  15. Tumbas, P., Matkovic, P., & Sakal, M. (2015). Sustainable University: Assessment Tools, Factors , Measures and Model SUSTAINABLE UNIVERSITY : ASSESSMENT TOOLS , FACTORS , MEASURES AND MODEL Pere Tumbas , Predrag Matkovic , Marton Sakal , Veselin Pavlicevic. EDULEARN15 Conference, July, 6208–6214
  16. Universidad San Francisco de Quito - Ecuador. (n.d.). Home. Retrieved from https://www.usfq.edu.ec/en
  17. Universidad San Francisco de Quito. (n.d.). Sustainability Office. Retrieved from https://www.usfq.edu.ec/en/node/2390
  18. University of Indonesia (2024). Welcome to UI GreenMetric - UI GreenMetric. Retrieved from https://greenmetric.ui.ac.id/
  19. Valencia, M., Villacreses, S., Benítez, D. S., Velasco, A., & Ochoa-Herrera, V. (2018). Towards a Sustainable Energy-Efficient Future at Universities, Universidad San Francisco de Quito Case Study, Phase I. 2018 IEEE ANDESCON, 1–6
  20. Velasco, A., Valencia, M., Morrow, S., & Ochoa-Herrera, V. (2018). Understanding the limits of assessing sustainability at Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Ecuador, while reporting for a North American system. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(4), 721–738. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-04-2017-0054

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.