Understanding The Drivers and Barriers Towards Sustainable Consumption: An Approach by Linking a Pedagogical Strategy of Active Learning with Adopting Sustainable Behaviors by Students

Claudia Arias

doi:10.14710/jsp.2024.25041

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jsp.2024.25041

Understanding The Drivers and Barriers Towards Sustainable Consumption: An Approach by Linking a Pedagogical Strategy of Active Learning with Adopting Sustainable Behaviors by Students

*Claudia Arias

- Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración - CESA Business School | CESA Business School |, Colombia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{JSP25041,
    author = {Claudia Arias},
    title = {Understanding The Drivers and Barriers Towards Sustainable Consumption: An Approach by Linking a Pedagogical Strategy of Active Learning with Adopting Sustainable Behaviors by Students},
    journal = {Journal of Sustainability Perspectives},
  volume = {4},
    number = {3},
    year = {2024},
    keywords = {},
    abstract = { Adopting sustainable consumption behaviors is imperative for achieving better sustainable production and consumption patterns (SDG12). Individuals play a crucial role in this goal as both part of the problem and the solution. Consequently, various actors aim to address the factors influencing individuals' adoption of these behaviors. Among these actors, higher education institutions play a unique role due to their opportunity to guide future generations through Education for Sustainable Consumption (ESC) towards sustainable values, attitudes, competencies, and behaviors. Understanding the drivers and barriers individuals face toward sustainable consumption is crucial for actively pursuing sustainability. However, few efforts have addressed this problem based on the actual experiences of individuals, and even fewer have focused on students as individuals who will hopefully lead organizations with a sustainability mindset. This research aims to fill this gap by linking a pedagogical strategy of active learning to the adoption of sustainable behaviors. Using a qualitative approach, we analyzed the experiences that students reported over three academic semesters in an online forum. The findings reveal that barriers to adopting sustainable behaviors are mostly contextual, while internal factors motivate people to advance toward this type of practice. From this methodological approach, emergent factors provide insights that could guide future policies and strategies to achieve better sustainable consumption patterns. },
   issn = {2797-7137},   pages = {270--293}  doi = {10.14710/jsp.2024.25041},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jsp/article/view/25041}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Adopting sustainable consumption behaviors is imperative for achieving better sustainable production and consumption patterns (SDG12). Individuals play a crucial role in this goal as both part of the problem and the solution. Consequently, various actors aim to address the factors influencing individuals' adoption of these behaviors. Among these actors, higher education institutions play a unique role due to their opportunity to guide future generations through Education for Sustainable Consumption (ESC) towards sustainable values, attitudes, competencies, and behaviors. Understanding the drivers and barriers individuals face toward sustainable consumption is crucial for actively pursuing sustainability. However, few efforts have addressed this problem based on the actual experiences of individuals, and even fewer have focused on students as individuals who will hopefully lead organizations with a sustainability mindset. This research aims to fill this gap by linking a pedagogical strategy of active learning to the adoption of sustainable behaviors. Using a qualitative approach, we analyzed the experiences that students reported over three academic semesters in an online forum. The findings reveal that barriers to adopting sustainable behaviors are mostly contextual, while internal factors motivate people to advance toward this type of practice. From this methodological approach, emergent factors provide insights that could guide future policies and strategies to achieve better sustainable consumption patterns.

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Original Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 4, No 3 (2024)

Recent articles

Sustainable Water Management Practices at ETUT: Innovations and Policies Campus 5.0: Monitoring Vehicle Emissions for More Sustainable Mobility Research and Teaching for Sustainability in the RUDN University More recent articles

Kostadinova E. Sustainable Consumer Behavior: Literature Overview.: EBSCO Discovery Service. Econ Altern [Internet]. 2016;1(2):224–34. Available from: http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=12&sid=aa25746c-d74f-427f-9cc4-f45d3f43f224%40sessionmgr4007
Sheoran M, Kumar D. Benchmarking the barriers of sustainable consumer behaviour. Soc Responsib J. 2022;18(1):19–42
Connolly J, Prothero A. Green consumption: Life-politics, risk and contradictions. J Consum Cult. 2008;8(1):117–45
Stern PC. Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior: EBSCOhost. J Soc Issues [Internet]. 2000;563(3):407–24. Available from: https://web-a-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.stanford.edu/ehost/detail/detail?sid=d99525c6-f727-4e02-8eee-52b7f4ba9f70%40sessionmgr4006&vid=0&hid=4214&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=3997994&db=aph
Kreuzer C, Weber S, Off M, Hackenberg T, Birk C. Shedding light on realized sustainable consumption behavior and perceived barriers of young adults for creating stimulating teaching-learning situations. Sustain. 2019;11(9)
Sheoran M, Kumar D. Modelling the enablers of sustainable consumer behaviour towards electronic products. J Model Manag. 2020;15(4):1543–65
Cerri J, Testa F, Rizzi F. The more I care, the less I will listen to you: How information, environmental concern and ethical production influence consumers’ attitudes and the purchasing of sustainable products. J Clean Prod [Internet]. 2018;175:343–53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.054
Gleim M, Lawson SJ. Spanning the gap: An examination of the factors leading to the green gap. J Consum Mark. 2014;31(6–7):503–14
Zsóka Á, Szerényi ZM, Széchy A, Kocsis T. Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. J Clean Prod [Internet]. 2013;48:126–38. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.030
Kim HY, Chung JE. Consumer purchase intention for organic personal care products. J Consum Mark. 2011;28(1):40–7
Barbarossa C, De Pelsmacker P. Positive and Negative Antecedents of Purchasing Eco-friendly Products: A Comparison Between Green and Non-green Consumers. J Bus Ethics. 2016;134(2)
Testa F, Pretner G, Iovino R, Bianchi G, Tessitore S, Iraldo F. Drivers to green consumption: a systematic review [Internet]. Vol. 23, Environment, Development and Sustainability. Springer Netherlands; 2021. 4826–4880 p. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00844-5
Biswas A, Roy M. Green products: An exploratory study on the consumer behaviour in emerging economies of the East. J Clean Prod [Internet]. 2015;87(1):463–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.075
Aguirre Sánchez L, Roa-Díaz ZM, Gamba M, Grisotto G, Moreno Londoño AM, Mantilla-Uribe BP, et al. What Influences the Sustainable Food Consumption Behaviours of University Students? A Systematic Review. Int J Public Health. 2021;66(September):1–15
Waris I, Hameed I. An empirical study of consumers intention to purchase energy efficient appliances. Soc Responsib J. 2020;17(4):489–507
Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, Guagnano GA, Kalof L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev. 1999;6(2):81–97
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211
Zepeda L, Deal D. Organic and local food consumer behaviour: Alphabet theory. Int J Consum Stud. 2009;33(6):697–705
Gam HJ. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management : An International Article information : J Fash Mark Manag. 2011;15(2):178–93
Wang Z, Zhao C, Yin J, Zhang B. Purchasing intentions of Chinese citizens on new energy vehicles: How should one respond to current preferential policy? J Clean Prod [Internet]. 2017;161:1000–10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.154
Wu JH, Wu CW, Lee CT, Lee HJ. Green purchase intentions: An exploratory study of the Taiwanese electric motorcycle market. J Bus Res [Internet]. 2015;68(4):829–33. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.036
Vafadarnikjoo A, Mishra N, Govindan K, Chalvatzis K. Assessment of consumers’ motivations to purchase a remanufactured product by applying Fuzzy Delphi method and single valued neutrosophic sets. J Clean Prod. 2018;196:230–44
Dahm MJ, Samonte A V., Shows AR. Organic foods: Do eco-friendly attitudes predict eco-friendly behaviors? J Am Coll Heal. 2009;58(3):195–202
McReynolds K, Gillan W, Naquin M. An Examination of College Students’ Knowledge, Perceptions, and Behaviors Regarding Organic Foods. Am J Heal Educ [Internet]. 2018;49(1):48–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2017.1399837
Hamilton K, Hekmat S. "Organic food and university students: a pilot study. Nutr Food Sci. 2018;48(2):218–27
Vizcaino M, Ruehlman LS, Karoly P, Shilling K, Berardy A, Lines S, et al. A goal-systems perspective on plant-based eating: Keys to successful adherence in university students. Public Health Nutr. 2021;24(1):75–83
Kawasaki Y, Akamatsu R, Fujiwara Y, Omori M, Sugawara M, Yamazaki Y, et al. Is mindful eating sustainable and healthy? A focus on nutritional intake, food consumption, and plant-based dietary patterns among lean and normal-weight female university students in Japan. Eat Weight Disord [Internet]. 2021;26(7):2183–99. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-020-01093-1
Hopwood CJ, Bleidorn W, Schwaba T, Chen S. Health, environmental, and animal rights motives for vegetarian eating. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020;15(4):20–4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230609
Ghoshal M. Abstract : BVIMR, Manag Edge. 2011;4(1):82–92
Sen RA. A Study of the Impact of Green Marketing Practices on Consumer Buying Behaviour in Kolkata. Int J Manag Commer Innov. 2014;2(1):61–70
Osterhus TL. Pro-Social Consumer Influence Strategies: When and how do they Work? J Mark. 1997;61(4):16–29
Ellen P, Wiener JLJ, Cobb-Walgren C, Scholder Ellen P, Wiener JLJ, Cobb-Walgren C. The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. J Public Policy Mark [Internet]. 1991;10(2):102–17. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30000238
Sayogo D, Zhang J, Picazo-Vela S, Bahaddin B, Luna-Reyes L. Understanding the intention to trust product information and certifications to promote sustainable consumption: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Proc Annu Hawaii Int Conf Syst Sci. 2018;2018-Janua:5412–21
Vermeir I, Verbeke W. Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecol Econ. 2008;64(3):542–53
Öberseder M, Schlegelmilch BB, Gruber V. “Why Don’t Consumers Care About CSR?”: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Role of CSR in Consumption Decisions. J Bus Ethics. 2011;104(4):449–60
Zámková M, Prokop M. Consumer behaviour of students when shopping for organic food in the Czech Republic. Acta Univ Agric Silvic Mendelianae Brun. 2013;61(4):1191–201
Smith CF, Burke LE, Wing RR. Vegetarian and weight-loss diets among young adults. Obes Res. 2000;8(2):123–9
Barth M, Adomßent M, Fischer D, Richter S, Rieckmann M. Learning to change universities from within: A service-learning perspective on promoting sustainable consumption in higher education. J Clean Prod. 2014;62:72–81
Khalili NR, Melaragno W, Haddadian G. Promoting sustainable consumption: Good Practices in OECD Countries. Pract Sustain From Grounded Theory to Emerg Strateg. 2008;207–24
Rieckmann M. Issues and Trends in Education for Sustainable Development. Leicht A, Heiss J, Byund WJ, editors. Issues and Trends in Education for Sustainable Development. France, Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; 2018
Cambridge Assessment-International Education. ¿Cuál es el significado de Aprendizaje Activo? Ucles. 2019;1–5
Vare P, Scott W. Learning for a Change: Exploring the Relationship Between Education and Sustainable Development. J Educ Sustain Dev. 2007;1(2):191–8
Arias C, Vélez-Rolón AM, Méndez-Pinzón M. Mapping the Concept of Sustainable Consumption: An Analysis From the Adoption and Promotion of Pro-Environmental and Social Behaviors in University Students. Front Educ. 2021;6(November):1–15
Fischer D, Böhme T, Geiger SM. Measuring young consumers’ sustainable consumption behavior: development and validation of the YCSCB scale. Young Consum. 2017;18(3):312–26
Stanes E, Klocker N, Gibson C. Young adult households and domestic sustainabilities. Geoforum [Internet]. 2015;65:46–58. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.007
Costa Pinto D, Herter MM, Rossi P, Borges A. Going green for self or for others? Gender and identity salience effects on sustainable consumption. Int J Consum Stud. 2014;38(5):540–9
Aizawa H, Yoshida H, Sakai S ichi. Current results and future perspectives for Japanese recycling of home electrical appliances. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2008;52(12):1399–410
Cucchiella F, D’Adamo I, Lenny Koh SC, Rosa P. Recycling of WEEEs: An economic assessment of present and future e-waste streams. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;51:263–72
Ek C, Miliute-Plepiene J. Behavioral spillovers from food-waste collection in Swedish municipalities. J Environ Econ Manage [Internet]. 2018;89:168–86. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.01.004
Emekci S. Green consumption behaviours of consumers within the scope of TPB. J Consum Mark. 2019;36(3):410–7
Saphores JDM, Nixon H. How effective are current household recycling policies? Results from a national survey of U.S. households. Resour Conserv Recycl [Internet]. 2014;92:1–10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.08.010
Ha S, Kwon SY. Spillover from past recycling to green apparel shopping behavior: the role of environmental concern and anticipated guilt. Fash Text. 2016;3(1)
Hanss D, Böhm G, Doran R, Homburg A. Sustainable Consumption of Groceries: the Importance of Believing that One Can Contribute to Sustainable Development. Sustain Dev. 2016;24(6):357–70
Jaiswal D, Kant R. Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers. J Retail Consum Serv [Internet]. 2018;41(August 2017):60–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.008
Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, Guagnano GA, Kalof L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev. 1999;6(2):81–97
Mostafa MM. Gender differences in Egyptian consumers’ green purchase behaviour: The effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. Int J Consum Stud. 2007;31(3):220–9
Newton JD, Tsarenko Y, Ferraro C, Sands S. Environmental concern and environmental purchase intentions: The mediating role of learning strategy. J Bus Res [Internet]. 2015;68(9):1974–81. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.007
Kang J, Liu C, Kim SH. Environmentally sustainable textile and apparel consumption: The role of consumer knowledge, perceived consumer effectiveness and perceived personal relevance. Int J Consum Stud. 2013;37(4)
Onwezen MC, Antonides G, Bartels J. The Norm Activation Model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. J Econ Psychol. 2013;39
Paul J, Modi A, Patel J. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. J Retail Consum Serv. 2016;29
Albayrak T, Aksoy Ş, Caber M. The effect of environmental concern and scepticism on green purchase behaviour. Mark Intell Plan. 2013;31(1):27–39
Arli D, Tan LP, Tjiptono F, Yang L. Exploring consumers’ purchase intention towards green products in an emerging market: The role of consumers’ perceived readiness. Int J Consum Stud. 2018;42(4):389–401
Sreen N, Purbey S, Sadarangani P. Impact of culture, behavior and gender on green purchase intention. J Retail Consum Serv [Internet]. 2018;41(December 2017):177–89. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.12.002
Kumar P, Ghodeswar BM. Factors affecting consumers’ green product purchase decisions. Mark Intell Plan. 2015;33(3):330–47
Cowan K, Kinley T. Green spirit: Consumer empathies for green apparel. Int J Consum Stud. 2014;38(5):493–9
Khare A. Antecedents to green buying behaviour: A study on consumers in an emerging economy. Mark Intell Plan. 2015;33(3):309–29
Truelove HB, Yeung KL, Carrico AR, Gillis AJ, Raimi KT. From plastic bottle recycling to policy support: An experimental test of pro-environmental spillover. J Environ Psychol [Internet]. 2016;46:55–66. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.03.004
Whitmarsh LE, Haggar P, Thomas M. Waste reduction behaviors at home, at work, and on holiday: What influences behavioral consistency across contexts? Front Psychol. 2018;9(DEC):1–13
Poortinga W, Whitmarsh L, Suffolk C. The introduction of a single-use carrier bag charge in Wales: Attitude change and behavioural spillover effects. J Environ Psychol [Internet]. 2013;36:240–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.09.001
Cornelissen G, Pandelaere M, Warlop L, Dewitte S. Positive cueing: Promoting sustainable consumer behavior by cueing common environmental behaviors as environmental. Int J Res Mark. 2008;25(1):46–55
Maki A, Carrico AR, Raimi KT, Truelove HB, Araujo B, Yeung KL. Meta-analysis of pro-environmental behaviour spillover. Nat Sustain. 2019;2(4)
Arias C, Trujillo CA. Perceived consumer effectiveness as a trigger of behavioral spillover effects: A path towards recycling. Sustain. 2020;12(11)
Nguyen TN, Lobo A, Greenland S. Pro-environmental purchase behaviour: The role of consumers’ biospheric values. J Retail Consum Serv [Internet]. 2016;33:98–108. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.010
Verplanken B, Roy D. Empowering interventions to promote sustainable lifestyles: Testing the habit discontinuity hypothesis in a field experiment. J Environ Psychol [Internet]. 2016;45:127–34. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.008
Trujillo CA, Arias C, Diaz AM. The effect of consumer lockdown on the relationship between environmental beliefs and pro-environmental behaviors. Environ Res Commun. 2023;5(5):0–23
Tsarenko Y, Ferraro C, Sands S, McLeod C. Environmentally conscious consumption: The role of retailers and peers as external influences. J Retail Consum Serv [Internet]. 2013;20(3):302–10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.01.006
Kanchanapibul M, Lacka E, Wang X, Chan HK. An empirical investigation of green purchase behaviour among the young generation. J Clean Prod. 2014;66
William Y, Kumju H, Seonaidh M, Caroline JO. Sustainable consumption: green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustain Dev [Internet]. 2009;18(March 2009):20–31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.394
Mäkiniemi JP, Vainio A. Barriers to climate-friendly food choices among young adults in Finland. Appetite. 2014;74:12–9
Balderjahn I, Buerke A, Kirchgeorg M, Peyer M, Seegebarth B, Wiedmann KP. Consciousness for sustainable consumption: scale development and new insights in the economic dimension of consumers’ sustainability. AMS Rev. 2013;3(4):181–92
Biasutti M, Frate S. A validity and reliability study of the Attitudes toward Sustainable Development scale. Environ Educ Res. 2017;23(2):214–30
Schaefer A, Crane A. Addressing sustainability and consumption. J Macromarketing. 2005;25(1):76–92
Izmirli S, Phillips CJC. The relationship between student consumption of animal products and attitudes to animals in Europe and Asia. Br Food J. 2011;113(3):436–50

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Journal of Sustainability Perspectives provides immediate open acess to its published articles, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license. As such, everyone is free to read, download, print, copy, search, upload to a social network or institutional repository, crawl for indexing, link to the full text, transform, pass as data into software, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, without requiring prior permission from either the athor(s) or the journal, provided they give appropriate attribution to the original author(s) and the Journal of Sustainability Perspectives, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.

Authors, themselves, are not beholden to these requirments, as they retain the copyright of articles, without restrictions, merely granting the journal a non-exclusive lincese to publish their article and identify itself as its original publisher. However, by submitting to the Journal of Sustainability Perspectives, authors recignize and assent to the rights of readers, in accordance with the CC BY-SA lincense.

Editorial Office

Universitas Diponegoro

Jl Prof Sudharto SH, Tembalang, Semarang Indonesia 50275

Email : jsp@live.undip.ac.id

Theme Copyright by Universitas Diponegoro. Powered by Public Knowledge Project OJS and Mason Publishing OJS theme.