DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jsp.2023.15365

What is missing to understand sustainability?

*Rosalba Thomas orcid  -  Environmental Management Center of University of Colima, Mexico., Mexico
Open Access Copyright 2023 Journal of Sustainability Perspectives
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Despite the enormous global problems linked not only to the ecological sphere, but also to the environmental, political, economic, social and cultural dimensions, humanity continues to consider that the discourse of sustainability has a close and unique relationship with nature. It is not like this. This text aims to make a deeper reflection on the historical context, interests and power relations that derive from considering sustainability as an alternative development model. More than a neutral discourse, sustainability must always land in a specific historical and spatial context, which allows it to adapt, and then perhaps become more operational and functional. The hypothesis places the media as simplistic and, at times partial interlocutors; but definitely not neutral, which prevents the individual from understanding the complex dynamics of the planet and the possible solutions to current problems. It is not only the fact that the media define what sustainability is, it is also important to reflect on how and why they do it.

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
A Sustainable Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Approach through Potable Living Wall for Closed Confined Spaces: A Way Forward to Fight Covid19 Student engagement: the key role of Sustainable Transportation at KMUTT Thailand An Ecosystem Approach for The Sustainable Use and Management of the Lake Victoria Ecosystem More recent articles
  1. Ardila, R. (2003). Quality of life: an integrative definition. Latin American Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 161-164. Retrieved on February 14, 2021, from http://redalyc.org/pdf/805/80535203.pdf
  2. Arias, A. S. (December 17, 2015). Economipedia. Retrieved from https://economipedia.com/historia/origen-de-la-economia.html
  3. Bautista, M., & Cuevas, A. (2007). Philosophy of man in Hegel. Retrieved on February 14, 2021, from http://revistadelauniversidad.unam.mx/4007/pdfs/107-108.pdf
  4. Biescas, K. L. (2018). Humanism and Renaissance. Retrieved on February 13, 2021, from http://contenidosdigitales.uned.es/fez/view/intecca:videocmav-5af53767b1111f34588b456d
  5. Bullock, A. (1985). The humanist tradition in the West. Madrid: Alianza
  6. Calvente, A. M. (2007). The modern concept of sustainability. Journal of Socioecology and sustainable development, 7
  7. CEMEX. (February 19, 2021). CEMEX. Obtained from https://www.cemexmexico.com/
  8. Elizalde, A. (2003). Sustainability: for all or just for some? Polis, Latin American magazine, 1-14
  9. Grarcía V., M. Á. (April 14, 2018). Pollution suffocates the economy. The Country, p. Available at https://elpais.com/economia/2018/04/12/actualidad/1523532932_165583.html
  10. Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening. Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: University Press
  11. Hall, S. (2006). Cultural studies: two paradigms. Colombian Journal of Sociology, 233-254
  12. Harari, N. Y. (2019). From animals to gods: A brief history of mankind. Buenos Aires: Debate
  13. Jacques, M. (2003). Model of participation by condition: a model for the development of local citizenship. Polis Latin American Magazine, 1-16
  14. Kant, E. (2009). What is Enlightenment. Education Forum, 7(11), 249-254. Retrieved on 2/13/2021, from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/3171408.pdf
  15. Landrigan, P.; Fuller, R. et al. (2018). The Lancet Planetary Health. New York: The Lancet, Vol. 391
  16. Lizaga, L. d., & Luis, J. (2010). ¿Can Aristotle guide us? The 'good life'from the discursive ethics. Recuperado el 14 de 2 de 2021, de http://scielo.org.co/pdf/ef/n41/n41a10.pdf
  17. Michelsen, G. (2003). What is specific in communication on environmental issues? Polis Latin American Magazine, 1-15
  18. Míguez, P. (2009). The birth of the modern state and the origins of political economy. Nomads: Critical Journal of Social and Legal Sciences, 22(2), 205-225. Retrieved on February 13, 2021, from http://pendientedemigracion.ucm.es/info/nomadas/22/pablomiguez.pdf
  19. Naredo, J. M. (2002). Economy and sustainability: the ecological economy in perspective. Polis, 1(2), 12. Retrieved on February 13, 2021, from https://journals.openedition.org/polis/7917
  20. Naredo, J. M. (2002). Economy and sustainability: the ecological economy in perspective. Cops. Latin American Magazine
  21. UNDP (17 de 02 de 2021). United Nations Development Program. Retrieved from https://www.mx.undp.org/content/mexico/es/home.html
  22. Animal Político (16 de julio de 2019). Grupo México accumulates 22 'accidents' with environmental impact; is inadmissible, the law will apply: Semarnat. Political Animals, pp. https://www.animalpolitico.com/2019/07/grupo-mexico-accidentes-impacto-ambiental-semarnat/
  23. Raskin, P. (2005). Global Scenarios in Historical Perspective. Scenario Assessment Report, 36-44
  24. Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations. Titivillus
  25. Staudenmann, E. y Schmassmann, J. (July 18, 2005). SocialWatch. Retrieved from https://www.socialwatch.org/node/17379
  26. Thomas, R. (2018). The discourse of sustainability in Mexico, a media construction. Colima, Mexico: University of Colima
  27. Waksman, V. (2013). Jean-Jacques Rousseau: self-love and public happiness. Retrieved on February 14, 2021, from https://publicaciones.sociales.uba.ar/index.php/anacronismo/article/view/1039

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.