DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.8.2.116-131

KEMUNGKINAN PENERAPAN BERBAGI RUANG BERDASARKAN PERSEPSI PENGGUNA JALAN

Aisya Rahmania Putri  -  Jurusan Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, , Indonesia
Fanny Safitri  -  Jurusan Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, , Indonesia
M Nouval Irfandhia Wahid  -  Jurusan Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, , Indonesia
*Imma Widyawati Agustin  -  Jurusan Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Teknik, , Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengembangan Kota

Citation Format:
Abstract

Jalan Sigura-gura sebagai salah satu ruas jalan strategis di Kota Malang yang menjadi penghubung menuju kawasan pendidikan, perdagangan dan jasa serta permukiman sehingga menjadi salah satu kawasan padat pergerakan. Penggunaan ruang jalan didominasi oleh pengguna kendaraan bermotor yang mengakibatkan ketidakamanan dan ketidaknyamanan bagi pengguna jalan lain seperti pejalan kaki dan pesepeda. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji kemungkinan penerapan berbagi ruang berdasarkan persepsi pengguna jalan. Berbagi ruang disini merupakan rekayasa lalu lintas dengan menghapuskan pembatas dan penanda fisik perbedaan jalur suatu ruang jalan. Penelitian ini menggunakan 6 tahapan yaitu: eksisting, tidy up, declutter, relocate, rethink, dan final. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingkat pelayanan jalannya adalah C dan tingkat pelayanan simpangnya adalah E. Hal ini berarti bahwa arus kendaraan tidak stabil, kecepatan yang terkadang terhenti dan permintaan (volume) kendaraan yang sudah mendekati kapasitas. Tingkat pelayanan jalur pejalan kakinya adalah D, berarti hampir tidak tersedia ruang untuk bergerak. 80% pejalan kaki memberikan respon positif terhadap desain berbagi ruang.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Berbagi-Ruang; Pengguna-Jalan; Persepsi; Kota-Malang

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: ARTICLES
Language : ID
  1. Adams, J. (1995). Risk, 1st ed. London, UK: UCL Press
  2. Adams, J. (2013). Risk Compensation in Cities at Risk Cities at Risk (pp. 25-44): Springer
  3. Adams, J., Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., & Peterson, M. (2012). Handbook of Risk Theory: Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics, and Social Implications of Risk (Vol. 1): Springer Science & Business Media
  4. Alexander, Z. Ç., & Kostof, S. (1994). Streets: Critical Perspectives on Public Space: Univ of California Press
  5. Ardyanti, V. R., Agustin, I. W., & Utomo, D. M. (2019). Evaluasi Kinerja Jalur Pejalan Kaki Koridor Jalan Bendungan Sigura-Gura Kota Malang. Planning for Urban Region and Environment (PURE), 8(2), 35-46
  6. Clarke, E. (2006). Shared Space-The Alternative Approach To Calming Traffic. Traffic Engineering & Control, 47(8)
  7. Congress for the New Urbanism. (2000). Charter of The New Urbanism. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 20(4), 339-341. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.1177%2F027046760002000417
  8. Consultancy, M. V. A. (2010). Designing the Future: Shared Space: Qualitative Research. London, UK: Department for Transport
  9. Consultancy, M. V. A., Shore, F., & Uthayakumar, K. (2010). Designing the Future. Shared Space: Operational Assessment. London: Department for Transport
  10. Corbusier, L., & Eardley, A. (1973). The Athens Charter. New York: Grossman Publishers
  11. Department for Transport. (2011). Local Transport Note 1/11 Shared Space. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/3873/ltn-1-11.pdf
  12. Department for Transport. (2014). Reported Road Casualties in Great Britain: Quarterly Provisional Estimates Q2 2014 Statistical from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/370826/quarterly-estimates-apr-to-jun-2014.pdf
  13. Engwicht, D. (2005). Mental Speed Bumps: The Smarter Way to Tame Traflic. Envirobook, Annandale, NSW, Australia
  14. Express, M. (2013). Traders Share in Success of Poynton Shared Space Road Scheme. from http://www.macclesfield-express.co.uk/news/local-news/traders-share-success-poynton-shared-2526261,2013
  15. Farr, D. (2008). Sustainable Urbanism: Urban Design With Nature. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons
  16. Frosch, C., Martinelli, D., & Unnikrishnan, A. (2019). Evaluation of Shared Space to Reduce Traffic Congestion. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2019. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.1155/2019/6510396
  17. Frumkin, H., Frank, L., Frank, L. D., & Jackson, R. J. (2004). Urban Sprawl and Public Health: Designing, Planning, and Building for Healthy Communities. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press
  18. Gillies, A. (2009). Is The Road There To Share? Shared Space in An Australian Context. University of New South Wales, Bachelor of Planning
  19. Gilman, C., Gilman, R., & Tem, M. P. (2007). Shared-Use Streets–An Application of “Shared Space” to an American Small Town. Paper presented at the 3rd Urban Street Symposium, Seattle, WA, USA
  20. Hamilton-Baillie, B. (2008a). Shared Space: Reconciling People, Places and Traffic. Built environment, 34(2), 161-181. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.2148/benv.34.2.161
  21. Hamilton-Baillie, B. (2008b). Towards Shared Space. Urban Design International, 13(2), 130-138
  22. Hass-Klau, C. (2014). The Pedestrian and The City. New York, NY, USA: Routledge
  23. Holmes, C. (2015). Accidents by Design: The Holmes Report on “Shared Space” in The United Kingdom. London: Lord Holmes of Richmond
  24. Jacobs, A. B. (1993). Great Streets, 1st ed. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press
  25. Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of American Cities. New York, NY, USA: Modern Library Editions & Random House Inc
  26. Kaparias, I., Bell, M. G., Dong, W., Sastrawinata, A., Singh, A., Wang, X., & Mount, B. (2013). Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Traffic Conflicts in Street Designs With Elements of Shared Space. Transportation research record, 2393(1), 21-30. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.3141%2F2393-03
  27. Kaparias, I., Bell, M. G., Miri, A., Chan, C., & Mount, B. (2012). Analysing The Perceptions of Pedestrians and Drivers to Shared Space. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 15(3), 297-310. Doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.02.001
  28. Kirkup, A. (2013). “Poynton town centre,” Institution of Civil Engineers. from https://www.ice.org.uk/disciplines-and-resources/case-studies/poynton-town-centre
  29. Leafand, W. A., & Preusser, D. F. (1999). Literature Review on Vehicle Travel Speeds and Pedestrian Injuries Among Selected Racial/Ethnic Groups. Washington, DC, USA: Department of Transportation
  30. Lee, H., & Kim, S.-N. (2019). Shared Space and Pedestrian Safety: Empirical Evidence from Pedestrian Priority Street Projects in Seoul, Korea. Sustainability, 11(17), 4645. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.3390/su11174645
  31. Lusiana, L., & Suryani, M. (2014). Metode SLR untuk Mengidentifikasi Isu-Isu dalam Software Engineering. Sains dan Teknologi Informasi, 3(1), 1-11. Doi: https://dx.Doi.org/10.33372/stn.v3i1.347
  32. Mehta, V. (2013). The Street: A Quintessential Social Public Space. New York, NY, USA: Routledge
  33. Montgomery, C. (2013). Happy City: Transforming Our Lives through Urban Design. New York, NY, USA: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
  34. Moody, S., & Melia, S. (2014). Shared Space–Research, Policy and Problems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of The Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport
  35. Nainggolan, T. H., Mundra, I. W., Indra, S., & Mustika, M. (2016). Studi Pengaruh Simpang Bersinyal Terhadap Kemacetan Lalu lintas di Ruas Jalan Bendungan Sigura–gura Kota Malang. Paper presented at the Seminar Nasional Inovasi dan Aplikasi Teknologi Di Industri (SENIATI)
  36. Parolek, D. G., Parolek, K., & Crawford, P. C. (2008). Form Based Codes: A Guide For Planners, Urban Designers, Municipalities, and Developers. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons
  37. Pascucci, F., Rinke, N., Schiermeyer, C., Friedrich, B., & Berkhahn, V. (2015). Modeling of Shared Space With Multi-Modal Traffic Using a Multi-Layer Social Force Approach. Transportation Research Procedia, 10, 316-326. Doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.081
  38. Reid, S., Kocak, N., & Hunt, L. (2009). DfT Shared Space Project Stage 1: Appraisal of Shared Space. Retrieved 4 April, 2019, from http://www.bv.transports.gouv.qc.ca/mono/1018971.pdf
  39. Schönauer, R., Stubenschrott, M., Huang, W., Rudloff, C., & Fellendorf, M. (2012). Modeling Concepts For Mixed Traffic: Steps Toward A Microscopic Simulation Tool for Shared Space Zones. Transportation research record, 2316(1), 114-121. Doi: 10.3141%2F2316-13
  40. Setyowati, M. (2018). Faktor-Faktor Shared Space Street di Koridor Komersial Di Jalan Pemuda, Kota Magelang. ARSITEKTURA, 16(1), 139-150
  41. Shamsuddin, S., Hassan, N. R. A., & Bilyamin, S. F. I. (2012). Walkable Environment in Increasing The Liveability of a City. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 167-178. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.025
  42. Speck, J. (2012). Walkable City; Farrar. New York, NY, USA: Straus and Giroux
  43. Speck, J. (2018). Walkable City Rules: 101 Steps to Making Better Places. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press
  44. Tawil, M., Reicher, C., Ramadan, K. Z., & Jafari, M. (2014). Towards More Pedestrian Friendly Streets in Jordan: The Case of Al Medina Street in Amman. Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(2), 144. Doi: http://dx.Doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v7n2p144
  45. Wadu, A., Kusumawardhani, R., & Suherminingsih, I. (2018). Manajemen Lalu Lintas di Jalan Lingkar Kampus Universitas Brawijaya. JUTEKS: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 3(2), 266-272

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.