DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.8.1.58-66

APPLICATION OF IMPORTANCE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS (IPA) METHOD FOR GENDER BASED PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLANNING IN CORRIDOR I BUS RAPID TRANSIT SEMARANG CITY

Landung Esariti  -  Urban and Regional Planning Department, Engineering Faculty, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
*Kharunia Putri  -  Urban and Regional Planning Department, Engineering Faculty, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
Hadi Wahyono  -  Urban and Regional Planning Department, Engineering Faculty, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Pengembangan Kota

Citation Format:
Abstract
Gender-based public transport planning ensures accommodation of user group preferences to minimize inequality and discrimination among passenger needs. In the practice of accessing BRT Corridor I in Semarang City, it was identified that there were 3 aspects that determined the gap, namely: security, comfort, and accessibility. Importance Performance Analysis is used to describe the level of access gap by comparing service performance provided with passenger expectations. Of 70 respondents answered, 53 women and 17 men, two findings can be concluded. First, it was found that the value of disparity in male and female user groups was equally negative (-) which meant that services received by users were less than expected, with greater levels of access gaps for female user groups compared to male user groups with the value of the gap in women is -0.67 and in men -0.52. This shows that the problem of inequality in the female user group is more urgent to be addressed to meet adequate transportation needs and minimize the access gap that occurs in the female user group. Second, the main priority needs for handling access gaps in the female user group include accessibility aspects and comfort aspects, while in the male user group only the accessibility aspect is concerned. The role and purpose of the movement conducted are two key factors in priority differentiation.
Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Gender Mainstreaming; Bus Rapid Transit (BRT); Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) method

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: ARTICLES
Language : EN
  1. BPS Kota Semarang. (2017). Kota Semarang Dalam Angka (www.semarangkota.bps.go.id)
  2. Clarke, M. (2012). Making Transport Work for Women and Men: Challenges and Opportunities in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region-Lessons from Case Studies: The World Bank
  3. Effendi, H. (2018, 18 March 2018). Kemacetan di Semarang Mencapai 37 Jam Per Tahun, Metrojateng. Retrieved from https://metrojateng.com/kemacetan-di-semarang-mencapai-37-jam-per-tahun/
  4. Hamilton, K., & Jenkins, L. (2000). A Gender Audit for Public Transport: A New Policy Tool in The Tackling of Social Exclusion. Urban Studies, 37(10), 1793-1800. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.1080%2F00420980020080411
  5. Irawan, H. (2002). Prinsip Kepuasan Pelanggan. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo, 54, 55
  6. Kunieda, M., & Gauthier, A. (2007). Gender and Urban Transport: Fashionable and Affordable Sustainable Transport: A sourcebook for Policy-Makers in Developing Cities. Module 7a: Gender and Urban Transport: Smart and Affordable ( http://www.itdp.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/7aGenderUTSept300.pdf). Eschborn: GTZ
  7. Levi, A. P. A. (2012). Transportasi Publik yang Berkesetaraan Gender dan Sosial. 1-20
  8. Lindenau, M., & Böhler-Baedeker, S. (2014). Citizen and Stakeholder Involvement: A Precondition for Sustainable Urban Mobility. Transportation Research Procedia, 4(0), 347-360. Doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.026
  9. Ministry of Transportation. (2010). Panduan Pengintegrasian Aspek Gender dalam Perencanaan dan Penganggaran Kementerian Perhubungan
  10. Ministry of Women's Empowerment and RI Child Protection. (2019). Pembangunan Manusia Berbasis Gender 2019. Jakarta Ministry of Women's Empowerment and RI Child Protection
  11. Mulia, S. M., & Anwar, M. (2001). Keadilan dan Kesetaraan Gender (Perspektif Islam). Tim Pemberdayaan Perempuan Bidang Agama Departemen Agama RI
  12. Nasaruddin, U. (2004). Argumen Kesetaraan Gender; Perspektif Al-qur’an. Jakarta: Paramadina
  13. Ng, W.-S., & Acker, A. (2018). Understanding Urban Travel Behaviour by Gender for Efficient and Equitable Transport Policies. ( http://dx.Doi.org/10.1787/eaf64f94-en), International Transport Forum Discussion Paper
  14. Oliveira, C. (2014). Empowerment Labs: Gender Equality, Employability and Theatre Catalyzing Social Change. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56-63. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.010
  15. Peters, D. (2013). Gender and Sustainable Urban Mobility. Retrieved from http://dspace.ceid.org.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1/104/ekutuphane4.2.7.1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  16. Preston, J., & Rajé, F. (2007). Accessibility, Mobility and Transport-Related Social Exclusion. Journal of Transport geography, 15(3), 151-160. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.05.002
  17. Republic Indonesia. (2000). Intruksi Presiden Nomor 9 Tahun 2000 Tentang Pengarusutamaan Gender dalam Pembangunan Nasional Presiden Republik Indonesia
  18. Thynell, M. (2016). The Quest for Gender-Sensitive and Inclusive Transport Policies in Growing Asian Cities. Social Inclusion, 4(3), 72. Doi: 10.17645/si.v4i3.479
  19. Wefering, F., Rupprecht, S., Bührmann, S., & Böhler-Baedeker, S. (2013). Guidelines. developing and implementing a sustainable urban mobility plan. Paper presented at the Workshop, Mar
  20. Williams, B. (2005). Gender and Urban Transport. Habitat Debate, 11(1), 10

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.