DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.8.1.33-47

PARTICIPATION OF MALIOBORO’S PARKING ATTENDANTS RELOCATION IN RIGHT TO THE CITY PERSPECTIVE

*Pinurba Parama Pratiyudha  -  Department of Social Development and Welfare, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Pengembangan Kota

Citation Format:
Abstract

Right to the city become one of essential point in New Urban Agenda discussion, as the adoption of Sustainable Development Goals which includes point 11 on Sustainable Cities and Human Settlements. Right to the city is a concept which encloses political power, land ownership, and social justice within globalized cities which run into rapid change. Lefebvre describes the right to the city as people cry and demand a transformed and renewed urban life. Participation is seen as a basic right in the concept of the right to the city. This article drawing on a study case of relocation of Malioboro’s parking attendants. The relocation itself was one of the policies to revitalize tourism area along Malioboro street. In the process, there are some resistances from Malioboro’s parking attendants emerge as their concern on their sustainability after the relocation into the new place. Based on the field research, this article concludes that the process of participation that occurs does not meet up with parking attendants aspiration and the process is ruined by the government. Public participation is ineffective at the process and ruined as the government intervention in Malioboro parking attendants organization. The ineffectiveness of public participation is due to the logic of technocratic participation and the government's informal approach to some parking attendants.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Participation; Right to The City; Public Space Planning; Relocation of Malioboro’s Parking Attendants

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: ARTICLES
Language : EN
  1. Andres, L. (2013). Differential Spaces, Power Hierarchy and Collaborative Planning: A Critique of The Role of Temporary Uses in Shaping and Making Places. Urban Studies, 50(4), 759-775. Doi: 10.1177%2F0042098012455719
  2. Attoh, K. A. (2011). What Kind of Right is The Right to The City? Progress in human geography, 35(5), 669-685. Doi: 10.1177%2F0309132510394706
  3. Aunurrohman, C. (2007). Malioboro: Soal Pembangunan Kawasan Pejalan Kaki dan Dusta Proyek-Proyek di sana. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  4. Bloemraad, I. (2018). Theorising The Power of Citizenship as Claims-Making. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(1), 4-26. Doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1396108
  5. Blokland, T., Hentschel, C., Holm, A., Lebuhn, H., & Margalit, T. (2015). Urban Citizenship And Right To The City: The Fragmentation Of Claims. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 655-665. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12259
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101
  7. Cocola-Gant, A. (2019). Gentrification and Displacement: Urban Inequality in Cities of Late Capitalism. In T. Schwanen & R. v. Kempen (Eds.), Handbook of Urban Geography ( https://Doi.org/10.4337/9781785364600.00030). United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Lincoln: Sage Publications
  9. Dagger, R. (2002). Republican citizenship (E. F. Isin & B. S. Turner Eds.). London: Sage
  10. De Paula, N. (2016). The “Right to the City” and the New Urban Agenda. Retrieved from http://sdg.iisd.org/commentary/policy-briefs/the-right-to-the-city-and-the-new-urban-agenda/
  11. De Souza, M. L. (2012). Panem et Circenses Versus The Right to The City (Centre) in Rio de Janeiro: A short report. City, 16(5), 563-572. Doi: 10.1080/13604813.2012.709725
  12. Don, M. (1995). The End of Public Space?People's Park, Definitions of the Public, and Democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85(1), 108-133. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1995.tb01797.xa
  13. Eizenberg, E. (2012a). Actually Existing Commons: Three Moments of Space of Community Gardens in New York City. Antipode, 44(3), 764-782. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00892.x
  14. Eizenberg, E. (2012b). The Changing Meaning of Community Space: Two Models of NGO Management of Community Gardens in New York City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(1), 106-120. Doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01065.x
  15. Fernandes, E. (2007). Constructing The Right to The City'in Brazil. Social & legal studies, 16(2), 201-219. Doi: 10.1177%2F0964663907076529
  16. Fraser, N. (2010). Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York: Columbia University Press
  17. Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social Capital, Civil Society and Development. Third world quarterly, 22(1), 7-20. Doi: 10.1080/713701144
  18. Garcia, M. (2006). Citizenship Practices and Urban Governance in European Cities. Urban Studies, 43(4), 745-765. Doi: 10.1080%2F00420980600597491
  19. Harvey, D. (1990). Tile Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishers Inc
  20. Harvey, D. (2008). The Right to The City. In R. T. LeGates & F. Stout (Eds.), The City Reader (Sixth ed., pp. 270-278). New York: Routledge
  21. Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel Cities: From The Right to The City to The Urban Revolution. New York: Verso books
  22. Hiariej, E., & Törnquist, O. (2017). Indonesian Politics and Citizenship in Historical Perspective (E. Hiariej & K. Stokke Eds.). Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia
  23. Hohle, R. (2013). Black Citizenship and Authenticity in The Civil Rights Movement. London: Routledge
  24. Ingram, H., & Smith, S. R. (2011). Public Policy for Democracy. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press
  25. Isin, E. F., & Turner, B. S. (2002). Citizenship Studies: An Introduction (E. F. Isin & B. S. Turner Eds.). London: Sage
  26. Islar, M., & Irgil, E. (2018). Grassroots Practices of Citizenship and Politicization in The Urban: The Case of Right to The City Initiatives in Barcelona. Citizenship Studies, 22(5), 491-506. Doi: 10.1080/13621025.2018.1477919
  27. Kalandides, A. (2018). Citizen Participation: Towards a Framework for Policy Assessment. Journal of Place Management and Development. Doi: 10.1108/JPMD-02-2018-0017
  28. Kotus, J., & Sowada, T. (2017). Behavioural Model of Collaborative Urban Management: Extending The Concept of Arnstein's Ladder. Cities, 65, 78-86. Doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.02.009
  29. Kuymulu, M. B. (2013). The Vortex of Rights:‘Right to The City’at A Crossroads. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 923-940. Doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12008
  30. Kuymulu, M. B. (2014). Claiming The Right to The City: Towards The Production of Space From Below. (Dissertation), City University of New York
  31. Landy, M. (2011). Public Policy and Citizneship (H. M. Ingram & S. R. Smith Eds.). Wahington DC: The Brookings Institution
  32. Lees, L., Slater, T., & Wyly, E. (2013). Gentrification. New York: Routledge
  33. Lefebvre, H. (1990). From the Social Pact to the Contract of Citizenship (S. Elden, E. Lebas & E. Kofman Eds.). New York & London: Continuum
  34. Lefebvre, H. (2000). Writing Cities. Oxford: Basil Blackwood Ltd
  35. Lefebvre, H., & Nicholson-Smith, D. (1991). The Production of Space. New York: Routledge
  36. Marshall, T. H. (2009). Citizenship and Social Class. New York: W.W.Norton and Co
  37. Mathivet, C. (2010). The Right to The City: Keys to Understanding The Proposal for “Another City is Possible” (A. Sugranyes & C. Mathivet Eds.). Santiago, Chile: Habitat International Coalition (HIC)
  38. McCann, E. J. (1999). Race, Protest, and Public Space: Contextualizing Lefebvre in the US City. Antipode, 31(2), 163-184. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00098
  39. Mehta, J. D. (2013). The Penetration of Technocratic Logic into The Educational Field: Rationalizing Schooling from The Progressives to The Present. Teachers College Record, 113(5), 1-40
  40. Merrifield, A. (1993). Place and Space: A Lefebvrian Reconciliation. Transactions of the institute of British geographers, 8(4), 516-531. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.2307/622564
  41. Merrifield, A. (2011). The Right to The City and Beyond: Notes on A Lefebvrian Re-Conceptualization. City, 15(3-4), 473-481. Doi: 0.1080/13604813.2011.595116
  42. Mitchell, D., Attoh, K., & Staeheli, L. (2015). Whose City? What Politics? Contentious and Non-Contentious Spaces on Colorado’s Front Range. Urban Studies, 52(14), 2633-2648. Doi: 10.1177%2F0042098014550460
  43. Mulyani, S. (2016). Resistensi Juru Parkir Terhadap Penataan Kawasan Malioboro Yogyakarta. (Doctoral dissertation), Universitas Gajah Mada
  44. Njoh, A. J. (2017). “The Right-to-The-City Question” and Indigenous Urban Populations in Capital Cities in Cameroon. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 52(2), 188-200. Doi: 10.1177%2F0021909615570954
  45. Nurmisari, R. V. (2017). Dampak Relokasi Parkir Malioboro Terhadap Kehidupan Sosial Ekonomi Juru Parkir dan Masyarakat Sekitar Malioboro. (Skripsi), Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta
  46. Örs, İ. R. (2014). Genie in The Bottle: Gezi Park, Taksim Square, and The Realignment of Democracy and Space in Turkey. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 40(4-5), 489-498. Doi: 10.1177%2F0191453714525390
  47. Pradana, L. A. (2017). Respon dan Adaptasi Juru Parkir Malioboro Paska Relokasi ke Abu Bakar Ali. (Skripsi), Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta
  48. Purcell, M. (2003). Citizenship and The Right to The Global City: Reimagining The Capitalist World Order. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(3), 564-590. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00467
  49. Purcell, M. (2014). Possible Worlds: Henri Lefebvre and The Right to The City. Journal of urban affairs, 36(1), 141-154. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12034
  50. Rahman, K. S. (2018). Constructing Citizenship: Exclusion and Inclusion Through The Governance of Basic Necessities. Columbia Law Review, 118(8), 2447-2503. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26542514
  51. Ramadha, F. G. (2017). Kontestasi Kepentingan antar Stakeholder dalam Upaya Revitalisasi Kawasan Malioboro Studi Kasus: Konflik Relokasi Lahan Parkir Sisi Timur Jalan Malioboro ke Taman Parkir Portabel Abu Bakar Ali, Kota Yogyakarta, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. (Doctoral dissertation), Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta
  52. Ridarineni, N. (2016). Yogyakarta Diusulkan Jadi World Heritage City ke UNESCO, Republika.co.id. Retrieved from https://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/daerah/16/02/25/o33j6g384-yogyakarta-diusulkan-jadi-world-heritage-city-ke-unesco
  53. Ryan, M. (2011). Productions of Space: Civic Participation of Young People at University. British Educational Research Journal, 37(6), 1015-1031. Doi: 10.1080/01411926.2010.517827
  54. Savirani, A., & Aspinall, E. (2017). Adversarial Linkages: The Urban Poor and Electoral Politics in Jakarta. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 36(3), 3-34. Doi: 10.1177%2F186810341703600301
  55. Scott, J. (1999). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed ( https://Doi.org/10.1093/biomet/85.2.42). New Haven and London: Yale University Press
  56. Setiawan, B. (2005). Hak Masyarakat dalam Proses Penyusunan dan Implementasi Kebijakan Tata Ruang. Paper presented at the Forum Perencanaan Pembangunan Edisi Khusus (Januari)
  57. Siregar, A. (2016). Prolog Pemaknaan Terhadap Dinamika Kreatif Yogyakarta Era ‘60 – ‘70an. https://ashadisiregar.com/2016/05/28/orang-orang-malioboro/, from
  58. Smith, N. (1979). Toward a Theory of Gentrification a Back to The City Movement by Capital, Not People. Journal of the American planning association, 45(4), 538-548. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.1080/01944367908977002
  59. Smith, N. (1982). Gentrification and Uneven Development. Economic geography, 58(2), 139-155
  60. Smith, N. (2010). Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and The Production of Space (Third ed.). Athens and London: University of Georgia Press
  61. Soja, E. W. (1998). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Capital & Class, 22(1), 137-139. Doi: 10.1177%2F030981689806400112
  62. Sorensen, A., & Sagaris, L. (2010). From Participation to The Right to The City: Democratic Place Management at The Neighbourhood Scale in Comparative Perspective. Planning Practice & Research, 25(3), 297-316. Doi: 10.1080/02697459.2010.503424
  63. Springer, S. (2011). Public Space as Emancipation: Meditations on Anarchism, Radical Democracy, Neoliberalism and Violence. Antipode, 43(2), 525-562. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00827.x
  64. Stokke, K. (2017). Politics Of Citizenship: Towards An Analytical Framework. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia
  65. Stokke, K., & Törnquist, O. (2013). Transformative Democratic Politics Democratization in The Global South (pp. 3-20). New York: Macmillan Publishers Limited
  66. Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (2007). Contentious Politics. Boulder: Paradigm
  67. Törnquist, O. (2009). Introduction: The Problem is Representation! Towards an Analytical Framework Rethinking popular representation ( https://Doi.org/10.1057/9780230102095 pp. 1-23). New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  68. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta/DIY
  69. Usman, S. (2006). Malioboro: Kerjasama PT. Mitra Tata Persada dan Bappeda Kota Yogyakarta
  70. Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis: Implications for Conducting A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Nursing & health sciences, 15(3), 398-405. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
  71. Yardimci, S., & Bezmez, D. (2018). Disabled Istanbulites’ Everyday Life Experiences As ‘Urban Citizens’: Accessibility and Participation in Decision-Making. Citizenship Studies, 22(5), 475-490. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1477917
  72. Ye, C., Chen, M., Duan, J., & Yang, D. (2017). Uneven Development, Urbanization and Production of Space in The Middle-Scale Region Based on The Case Of Jiangsu Province, China. Habitat International, 66, 106-116. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.05.013
  73. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Los Angeles: Sage Publications
  74. Zieleniec, A. (2018). Lefebvre’s Politics of Space: Planning the Urban as Oeuvre. Urban Planning, 3(3), 5-15. Doi: https://Doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i3.1343
  75. Zuhdan, M. (2013). Manajemen Konflik Berbasis Komunitas: Studi Kasus Community Oriented Policing (COP) di Malioboro Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 17(2), 130-143

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.