BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JPK33277, author = {Livia Angelissa}, title = {TWO PLANS, ONE CITY : HOW JAKARTA IMPLEMENTS RATIONAL PLANNING THROUGH PARALLEL INSTRUMENTS}, journal = {Jurnal Pengembangan Kota}, volume = {13}, number = {1}, year = {2025}, keywords = {Dualism; Jakarta City; Rational Comprehensive Planning; Development Plan, Spatial Plan}, abstract = { Jakarta City is mandated by national law to produce two parallel 20-year planning instruments: the Regional Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPD 2025–2045) and the Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW 2024–2044). Both instruments are formally grounded in the Rational Comprehensive Planning Model (RCM) yet are treated with different institutional weight and operate through different mechanisms. This paper examines how RCM is interpreted and operationalised across these two parallel instruments, and what this means for Jakarta's urban governance. Drawing on direct practitioner participation in preparing both documents, combined with comparative document analysis, the study finds that each plan operationalises RCM through a distinct derivative: the RPJPD through a budget-driven development planning logic, and the RTRW through a permit-driven regulatory logic. Three structural intricacies emerge from this planning architecture dualism: a budget-spatial linkage gap, a private sector governance gap, and an institutional coordination gap. }, issn = {2503-0361}, pages = {92--103} doi = {10.14710/jpk.13.1.92-103}, url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpk/article/view/33277} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Jakarta City is mandated by national law to produce two parallel 20-year planning instruments: the Regional Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPD 2025–2045) and the Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW 2024–2044). Both instruments are formally grounded in the Rational Comprehensive Planning Model (RCM) yet are treated with different institutional weight and operate through different mechanisms. This paper examines how RCM is interpreted and operationalised across these two parallel instruments, and what this means for Jakarta's urban governance. Drawing on direct practitioner participation in preparing both documents, combined with comparative document analysis, the study finds that each plan operationalises RCM through a distinct derivative: the RPJPD through a budget-driven development planning logic, and the RTRW through a permit-driven regulatory logic. Three structural intricacies emerge from this planning architecture dualism: a budget-spatial linkage gap, a private sector governance gap, and an institutional coordination gap.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Starting from Volume 13 Number 2 2025, authors who publish in the Jurnal Pengembangan Kota retain full copyright ownership (Copyright@Author) of their work. In keeping with the journal’s commitment to open access, all articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Before Volume 13 Number 2 2025, copyright was still owned by the publisher, Universitas Diponegoro. To support a better open-access program, we have created a new policy so that authors have full copyright ownership. Readers and third parties may also use the content in accordance with the CC BY-NC-SA license. This includes the ability to reproduce, modify, and build upon the article, as long as proper attribution is given, and any resulting work is distributed under the same license.
