DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.12.1.86-95

PEMODELAN KEPUASAN PELANGGAN PADA LAYANAN BRT DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP MOBILITAS BERKELANJUTAN: STUDI KASUS BANDA ACEH, INDONESIA

Muhammad Yanis orcid  -  Program Doktor Ilmu Teknik, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
*Sofyan M Saleh  -  Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
Ashfa Achmad  -  Jurusan Arsitektur dan Perencanaan, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
Laina H Sari  -  Jurusan Arsitektur dan Perencanaan, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pengembangan Kota

Citation Format:
Abstract

Penelitian ini meneliti kepuasan pengguna terhadap layanan Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Trans Koetaradja di Banda Aceh, serta kontribusinya terhadap mobilitas perkotaan berkelanjutan. Meskipun BRT diperkenalkan untuk mengurangi ketergantungan pada kendaraan pribadi, tingkat penggunaan dan kepuasan pengguna layanan ini masih rendah. Dengan menggunakan Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), penelitian ini mengumpulkan data dari 500 responden pengguna Trans Koetaradja untuk mengidentifikasi pengaruh atribut kualitas layanan terhadap kepuasan pengguna. Selain itu, baik aspek pengelolaan maupun teknis terbukti berdampak positif terhadap persepsi kualitas layanan. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa peningkatan kepuasan pengguna dapat dicapai dengan fokus pada pemeliharaan fasilitas, peningkatan kondisi kendaraan, dan manajemen waktu serta rute yang lebih baik. Implikasi praktis dari penelitian ini adalah rekomendasi bagi pemerintah untuk mengembangkan kebijakan yang lebih adaptif terhadap kebutuhan masyarakat, guna mendorong penggunaan transportasi umum sebagai solusi mobilitas berkelanjutan di Banda Aceh.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Kualitas Layanan; Kepuasan Pelanggan; Aspek Pengelolaan; Aspek Teknis; Mobilitas Berkelanjutan
Funding: Badan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Manusia (BPSDM) Pemerintah Aceh, Indonesia

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: ARTICLES
Language : ID
  1. Alessandretti, L., Natera Orozco, L. G., Saberi, M., Szell, M., & Battiston, F. (2022). Multimodal Urban Mobility And Multilayer Transport Networks. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 50(8), 2038-2070. doi: 10.1177/23998083221108190
  2. Bakar, M. F., Norhisham, S., Katman, H. Y., Fai, C. M., Azlan, N. N., & Samsudin, N. S. (2022). Service Quality of Bus Performance in Asia: A Systematic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework. Sustainability, 14(13). Retrieved from doi: 10.3390/su14137998
  3. Barabino, B., Cabras, N. A., Conversano, C., & Olivo, A. (2020). An Integrated Approach to Select Key Quality Indicators in Transit Services. Social Indicators Research, 149(3), 1045-1080. doi: 10.1007/s11205-020-02284-0
  4. Chauhan, V., Gupta, A., & Parida, M. (2021). Demystifying Service Quality of Multimodal Transportation Hub (MMTH) Through Measuring Users’ Satisfaction of Public Transport. Transport Policy, 102, 47-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.004
  5. de Oña, J. (2022). Service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions towards public transport from the point of view of private vehicle users. Transportation, 49(1), 237–269. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10175-7
  6. de Oña, J., de Oña, R., & López, G. (2016). Transit Service Quality Analysis Using Cluster Analysis and Decision Trees: A Step Forward to Personalized Marketing in Public Transportation. Transportation, 43(5), 725-747. doi: 10.1007/s11116-015-9615-0
  7. Devi, M. K., Pramana, A. Y. E., & Safitri, R. (2022). Studi Komparatif Performa Angkutan Brt Transjogja Dan Transjakarta. Jurnal Pengembangan Kota, 10(1), 93-103. doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.10.1.93-103
  8. Fawwaz, F., & Rakhmatulloh, A. R. (2021). Analisis Pelayanan Integrasi Antarmoda Berdasarkan Persepsi Pengguna Di Krl Stasiun Sudirman. Jurnal Pengembangan Kota, 9(1), 111-123. doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.9.1.111-123
  9. Fu, X., & Juan, Z. (2017). Understanding Public Transit Use Behavior: Integration of The Theory of Planned Behavior and The Customer Satisfaction Theory. Transportation, 44(5), 1021-1042. doi: 10.1007/s11116-016-9692-8
  10. Irtema, H. I. M., Ismail, A., Borhan, M. N., Das, A. M., & Alshetwi, A. B. Z. (2018). Case Study of The Behavioural Intentions of Public Transportation Passengers in Kuala Lumpur. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 6(4), 462-474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.05.007
  11. Ismael, K., Esztergár-Kiss, D., & Duleba, S. (2023). Evaluating The Quality of The Public Transport Service During The COVID-19 Pandemic from The Perception of Two User Groups. European Transport Research Review, 15(1), 5. doi: 10.1186/s12544-023-00578-1
  12. Joewono, T. B., Wirayat, M. Y., Belgiawan, P. F., Andani, I. G., & Gunawijaya, C. (2023). Users’ Preferences in Selecting Transportation Modes for Leisure Trips in the Digital Era: Evidence from Bandung, Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(3). Retrieved from doi: 10.3390/su15032503
  13. Kotrlik, J., & Higgins, C. (2001). Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research. Information technology, learning, and performance journal, 19(1), 43
  14. Li, L., Bai, Y., Song, Z., Chen, A., & Wu, B. (2018). Public Transportation Competitiveness Analysis Based on Current Passenger Loyalty. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 113, 213-226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.016
  15. Litman, T. (2001). Generated Traffic: Implications for Transport Planning. ITE Journal (Institute of Transportation Engineers), 71, 38-47
  16. Liu, Y., Li, Y., & Li, W. (2019). Natural Language Processing Approach for Appraisal of Passenger Satisfaction and Service Quality of Public Transportation. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 13(11), 1701-1707. doi: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2019.0054
  17. Lodhi, A. S., & Jaiswal, A. (2024, 2024//). Passengers Perception and Satisfaction Level Towards Public Transport: A Review. Paper presented at the Transportation Research, Singapore
  18. Machado, J. L., de Oña, R., Diez-Mesa, F., & de Oña, J. (2018). Finding Service Quality Improvement Opportunities Across Different Typologies of Public Transit Customers. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 14(9), 761-783. doi: 10.1080/23249935.2018.1434257
  19. Mandhani, J., Nayak, J. K., & Parida, M. (2020). Interrelationships Among Service Quality Factors of Metro Rail Transit System: An Integrated Bayesian Networks and PLS-SEM Approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 140, 320-336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.08.014
  20. Möhlmann, M. (2015). Collaborative Consumption: Determinants of Satisfaction and The Likelihood of Using A Sharing Economy Option Again. Journal of consumer behaviour, 14(3), 193-207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1512
  21. Naing, L., Winn, T., & Rusli, B. (2006). Practical Issues in Calculating The Sample Size for Prevalence Studies. Archives of orofacial Sciences, 1, 9-14
  22. Nguyen-Phuoc, D. Q., Su, D. N., Tran, P. T. K., Le, D.-T. T., & Johnson, L. W. (2020). Factors Influencing Customer's Loyalty Towards Ride-Hailing Taxi Services – A Case Study of Vietnam. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 134, 96-112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.02.008
  23. Rakhmatulloh, A. R., Intan, D., & Dewi, K. (2022). Integrasi Antar Transportasi Umum di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Pengembangan Kota, 10(1), 36-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.10.1.36-46
  24. Ratanavaraha, V., Jomnonkwao, S., Khampirat, B., Watthanaklang, D., & Iamtrakul, P. (2016). The Complex Relationship Between School Policy, Service Quality, Satisfaction, and Loyalty for Educational Tour Bus Services: A Multilevel Modeling Approach. Transport Policy, 45, 116-126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.012
  25. Stojic, D., Ciric, Z., Sedlak, O., & Marcikic Horvat, A. (2020). Students’ Views on Public Transport: Satisfaction and Emission. Sustainability, 12(20). Retrieved from doi: 10.3390/su12208470
  26. Sun, S., & Duan, Z. (2019). Modeling Passengers’ Loyalty to Public Transit In A Two-Dimensional Framework: A Case Study in Xiamen, China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 124, 295-309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.007
  27. Van Acker, V., Ho, L., & Mulley, C. (2021). “Satisfaction Lies in The Effort”. Is Gandhi’s Quote Also True for Satisfaction With Commuting? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 151, 214-227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.07.010
  28. Yuan, Y., Yang, M., Wu, J., Rasouli, S., & Lei, D. (2019). Assessing Bus Transit Service from The Perspective of Elderly Passengers in Harbin, China. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(10), 761-776. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2018.1512691
  29. Zhang, C., Liu, Y., Lu, W., & Xiao, G. (2019). Evaluating Passenger Satisfaction Index Based on PLS-SEM Model: Evidence from Chinese Public Transport Service. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 120, 149-164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.013

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.