DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.12.1.1-12

EKSPLORASI INDIKATOR DAN PENGUKURAN INDEKS KOTA KOMPAK TERHADAP MANFAAT EKONOMI DI PROVINSI DKI JAKARTA

Refina Mahargita  -  Sekolah Arsitektur, Perencanaan, dan Pengembangan Kebijakan (SAPPK), Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
*Rakan Pramoe Izdihar  -  Sekolah Arsitektur, Perencanaan, dan Pengembangan Kebijakan (SAPPK), Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pengembangan Kota

Citation Format:
Abstract

Sekitar 1,25 juta penduduk wilayah Bodetabek melakukan kegiatan utama di Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Hal tersebut menyebabkan provinsi DKI Jakarta memiliki potensi untuk mendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi sehingga provinsi tersebut harus mampu mengelola pertumbuhan dan mempertahankan kekompakan. Dengan kepadatan penduduk, kondisi urbanisasi dan berbagai tantangan efisiensi lahan perkotaan menjadikan kelima Kota administrasi DKI Jakarta sebagai subjek yang menarik untuk penelitian indeks kekompakan kota. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji indeks kekompakan kota berdasarkan keluaran (outcome) ekonomi terhadap manfaat ekonomi perkotaan dalam mencegah perluasan kota. Metode perhitungan yang digunakan adalah Urban Compactness Index yang mengacu pada 3 variabel utama yaitu: (i) population density, (ii) land development density, dan (iii) road density. Kemudian menghitung indeks entropi di tiap wilayah administrasi dan membandingkannya dengan PDRB per kapita yang dihasilkan tiap wilayah administrasi. Didapatkan Jakarta Pusat memiliki nilai indeks entropi yang lebih rendah dibandingkan dengan Jakarta Utara, namun memiliki PDRB yang lebih tinggi.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Kota Kompak; Indeks Entropi; Manfaat Ekonomi; DKI Jakarta

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: ARTICLES
Language : ID
  1. Anabtawi, S. (2023). Towards a Better Understanding of Compact Cities. Journal of Planning Literature, 38(4), 531-547. doi: 10.1177/08854122231158768
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). DKI Jakarta Dalam Angka Tahun 2022. from Badan Pusat Statistik https://jakarta.bps.go.id/publication/2022/02/25/5979600247867d861a1f334c/provinsi-dki-jakarta-dalam-angka-2022.html
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia. (2019). Statistik Komuter Jabodetabek 2019. from Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2019/12/04/eab87d14d99459f4016bb057/statistik-komuter-jabodetabek-2019.html
  4. Bahadure, S., & Kotharkar, R. (2015). Assessing Sustainability of Mixed Use Neighbourhoods through Residents’ Travel Behaviour and Perception: The Case of Nagpur, India. Sustainability, 7(9), 12164-12189. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su70912164
  5. Blackburn, S. (2012). Jakarta : Sejarah 400 Tahun. In E. J. G. Triwira & R. Karunia (Ed.). Retrieved from https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=261932
  6. Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel Demand and The 3ds: Density, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199-219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
  7. Erikstad, L., Simensen, T., Bakkestuen, V., & Halvorsen, R. (2023). Index Measuring Land Use Intensity—A Gradient-Based Approach. Geomatics, 3(1), 188-204. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/geomatics3010010
  8. Fan, T., & Chapman, A. (2022). Policy Driven Compact Cities: Toward Clarifying the Effect of Compact Cities on Carbon Emissions. Sustainability, 14(19), 12634. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912634
  9. Gao, X., Zhang, A., & Sun, Z. (2020). How Regional Economic Integration Influence on Urban Land Use Efficiency？ A Case Study of Wuhan Metropolitan Area, China. Land Use Policy, 90, 104329. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104329
  10. Hummel, D. (2020). The Effects of Population and Housing Density in Urban Areas on Income in The United States. Local Economy, 35(1), 27-47. doi: 10.1177/0269094220903265
  11. IWATA, S., & KONDO, K. (2021). The Spillover Effects of Compact City Policy on Incumbent Retailers: Evidence from Toyama City. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/21085.html
  12. Keputusan Gubernur DKI Jakarta No. 113 Tahun 2023 Tentang Nilai Jual Objek Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan Perdesaan dan Perkotaan Tahun 2023
  13. Kurnia, A. A., Rustiadi, E., Fauzi, A., Pravitasari, A. E., Saizen, I., & Ženka, J. (2022). Understanding Industrial Land Development on Rural-Urban Land Transformation of Jakarta Megacity’s Outer Suburb. Land, 11(5). doi: 10.3390/land11050670
  14. Lan, T., Shao, G., Xu, Z., Tang, L., & Sun, L. (2021). Measuring Urban Compactness Based on Functional Characterization and Human Activity Intensity by Integrating Multiple Geospatial Data Sources. Ecological Indicators, 121, 107177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107177
  15. le Clercq, F., & de Vries, J. S. (2000). Public Transport and the Compact City. Transportation Research Record, 1735(1), 3-9. doi: 10.3141/1735-01
  16. Lee, M., Cheon, S., Son, S.-W., Lee, M. J., & Lee, S. (2023). Exploring the Relationship Between the Spatial Distribution of Roads and Universal Pattern of Travel-Route Efficiency in Urban Road Networks. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 174, 113770. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113770
  17. Li, S., Fu, M., Tian, Y., Xiong, Y., & Wei, C. (2022). Relationship between Urban Land Use Efficiency and Economic Development Level in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region. Land, 11(7), 976. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11070976
  18. McArdle, B. H. (2001). Population Density. In S. A. Levin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (pp. 745-758). New York: Elsevier
  19. Minal, Ravi Sekhar, C., & Madhu, E. (2022). Estimation of Value of Travel Time Based on Mixed Land Use of Trip Origin and Destination. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(2), 1207-1222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.04.009
  20. Miyao, T. (1987). Long-Run Urban Growth with Agglomeration Economies. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 19(8), 1083-1092. doi: 10.1068/a191083
  21. Mungkasa, O. (2022). Upaya Penerapan Model Kota Kompak. Konsep, Pembelajaran, dan Agenda Pengembangan Kota Kompak Indonesia dan Ibu Kota Nusantara. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359704995
  22. Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (2013). Sustainable Urban Form: The Big Picture. In M. J. Elizabeth Burton, Katie Williams (Ed.), Achieving sustainable urban form (pp. 109-120). New York: Routledge
  23. OECD. (2012). Compact City Policies: A Comparative Assessment. https://www.oecd.org/regional/greening-cities-regions/compact-city.htm#
  24. Rode, P., Floater, G., Thomopoulos, N., Docherty, J., Schwinger, P., Mahendra, A., & Fang, W. (2017). Accessibility in Cities: Transport and Urban Form. In G. Meyer & S. Shaheen (Eds.), Disrupting Mobility: Impacts of Sharing Economy and Innovative Transportation on Cities (pp. 239-273). Cham: Springer International Publishing
  25. Song, Y., & Knaap, G.-J. (2004). Measuring The Effects of Mixed Land Uses on Housing Values. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34(6), 663-680. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2004.02.003
  26. Surat Edaran Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 02/SE/M2018. 2018. Tentang Pedoman Bidang Jalan dan Jembatan
  27. Tan, W., & Lv, Y. (2022). Regional Economic Differences and Coordinated Development Based on Panel Data Model. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022, 3901720. doi: 10.1155/2022/3901720
  28. Thinh, N. X., Arlt, G., Heber, B., Hennersdorf, J., & Lehmann, I. (2002). Evaluation of Urban Land-Use Structures With A View to Sustainable Development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(5), 475-492. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00023-9
  29. Turner, M. G., Gardner, R. H., O'neill, R. V., & O'Neill, R. V. (2001). Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice (Vol. 401). New York: Springer
  30. Wafiq, A. N., & Suryanto, S. (2021). The Impact of Population Density and Economic Growth on Environmental Quality: Study in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 22(2), 301-312. doi: https://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.v22i2.10533
  31. Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhou, G., Ma, Z., Sun, H., & Fu, H. (2022). Coordinated Relationship between Compactness and Land-Use Efficiency in Shrinking Cities: A Case Study of Northeast China. Land, 11(3). Retrieved from doi: 10.3390/land11030366
  32. Watt, A. (2021). Land-Use Intensity and Land-Use Change: Impacts on Biodiversity. In W. Leal Filho, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, A. Lange Salvia, & T. Wall (Eds.), Life on Land (pp. 603-615). Cham: Springer International Publishing
  33. Wu, C., Wei, Y. D., Huang, X., & Chen, B. (2017). Economic Transition, Spatial Development and Urban Land Use Efficiency in The Yangtze River Delta, China. Habitat International, 63, 67-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.03.012
  34. Yao, Y., Pan, H., Cui, X., & Wang, Z. (2022). Do Compact Cities Have Higher Efficiencies of Agglomeration Economies? A Dynamic Panel Model With Compactness Indicators. Land Use Policy, 115, 106005. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106005
  35. Zheng, W. (2023). Land Supply and Industrial Agglomeration: Extension of The New Economic Geography Model With Land Elements Incorporated. Land Use Policy, 132, 106757. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106757

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.