DECENTRALIZATION OF HOUSING POLICY FOR LOW-INCOME COMMUNITIES IN URBAN AREAS: AN ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL, FISCAL AND, ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to discuss housing decentralization policies for urban Low-Income Communities based on three decentralization issues, namely politics, fiscal, and administration, and to recommend the concept of housing decentralization as an instrument and housing policy reform. The idea of decentralization of housing policy can’t be separated from various problems such as the debate over the authority of housing policy, the dependence of the regional government's housing budget on the central government, and various other obstacles. This study employed academic literature review related to decentralization studies and housing policies. The results of the study show that the three decentralization issues that are correlated with urban housing policies for Low-Income Communities have not yet fully provided an optimal impact on the realization of the ideal and desirable urban housing policies for Low-Income Communities. However, the very strong relationship between the three issues of decentralization and urban housing policy can be an important idea and recommendation to promote housing decentralization as an instrument and direction of urban housing policy reform for Low-Income Communities in Indonesia in the future.
Keywords
References
Ahmad, J., Devarajan, S., Khemani, S., & Shah, S. (2006). 10 Decentralization and Service Delivery. Handbook of Fiscal Federalism, 240. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847201515
Aid, E. (2007). Supporting Decentralisation and Local Governance in Third Countries. Europe Aid Tools and Methods Series Reference Document, 2(January).
Alm, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Indrawati, S. M. (2005). Reforming Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and The Rebuilding of Indonesia: The Big Bang Program and its Economic Consequences: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Altes, W. K. (2002). Local Government and the Decentralisation of Urban Regeneration Policies in The Netherlands. Urban Studies, 39(8), 1439-1452. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220142718
Average, C. (2019). Low Income Housing Problems and Low-Income Housing Solutions: Opportunities and Challenges in Bulawayo. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 34(3), 927-938. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09676-w
Azis, I. J. (2008). Institutional Constraints and Multiple Equilibria in Decentralization. Paper presented at the Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies: Journal of the Applied Regional Science Conference.
Barzelay, M. (1991). Managing Local Development: Lessons from Spain. Policy Sciences, 24(3), 271-290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186330
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cheema, G. S., & Rondinelli, D. A. (2007). Decentralizing Governance: Emerging Concepts and Practices.
CNN Indonesia. (2020, December). PUPR Siapkan Pembiayaan Perumahan Rp. 21,6 Trilyun untuk 2021, CNN Indonesia.
Conyers, D. (1984). Decentralization and Development: A Review of The Literature: Introduction. Public Administration & Development (pre-1986), 4(2), 187.
Conyers, D. (1986). Decentralisation and Development: A Framework for Analysis. Community Development Journal, 21(2), 88-100.
Davay, K. (1988). Pembiayaan Pemerintah Daerah: Praktek-praktek Internasional dan Relevansinya Bagi Dunia Ketiga. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Davoodi, H., & Zou, H.-f. (1998). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study. Journal of Urban Economics, 43(2), 244-257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1997.2042
Ebel, R. D., & Yilmaz, S. (2002). Concept of Fiscal Decentralization and Worldwide Overview: World Bank Institute Washington, DC.
Evans, A., & Manning, N. (2004). Administrative Decentralization: A Review of Staffing Practices during Decentralization in Eight Countries. Report, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Firman, T. (2009). Decentralization Reform and Local‐Government Proliferation in Indonesia: Towards A Fragmentation of Regional Development. Paper presented at the Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies: Journal of the Applied Regional Science Conference.
Firman, T. (2010). Multi Local-Government Under Indonesia’s Decentralization Reform: The Case of Kartamantul (The Greater Yogyakarta). Habitat International, 34(4), 400-405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.11.005
Gaus, N., Sultan, S., & Basri, M. (2017). State Bureaucracy in Indonesia and its Reforms: An Overview. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(8), 658-669. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1186179
Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., & Sanz, I. (2013). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: Spending Versus Revenue Decentralization. Economic Inquiry, 51(4), 1915-1931. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00508.x
Ghuman, B. S., & Singh, R. (2013). Decentralization and Delivery of Public Services in Asia. Policy and Society, 32(1), 7-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.02.001
Guerrero, O. A. (2020). Decentralized Markets and The Emergence of Housing Wealth Inequality. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 84, 101541. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101541
Hadiz, V., & Robison, R. (2004). Reorganising Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets: Routledge.
Hananel, R. (2013). Can centralization, Decentralization and Welfare Go Together? The Case of Massachusetts Affordable Housing Policy (Ch. 40B). Urban Studies, 51(12), 2487-2502. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0042098013512877
Haryanto, J. T. (2017). Desentralisasi Fiskal Seutuhnya. Jakarta: Kemenkeu RI.
Hofman, B., & Kaiser, K. (2004). The Making of The ‘Big Bang’and its Aftermath: A Political Economy Perspective. Reforming intergovernmental fiscal relations and the rebuilding of Indonesia: The “big bang” program and its economic consequences. Chaltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 15-45.
Johnson, C. (2003). Decentralisation in India: Poverty, Politics and Panchayati Raj (Vol. 199): Citeseer.
Kabar bisnis. (2010, September 2). Kuota FLPP Habis, Pembangunan Rumah untuk MBR Mandek, Kabarbisnis.Com. Retrieved from https://www.kabarbisnis.com/read/2894159/kuota-flpp-habis-pembangunan-rumah-untuk-mbr-mandek
Lee, K. S. (1999). Developing Towns and Cities: Lessons from Brazil and Philippines: World Bank Publications.
Leemans, A. (1970). Local Government Reform a Universial Problem. Los Angeles, California: UCLA.
Litvack, J. I., & Seddon, J. (1999). Decentralization Briefing Notes. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute Washington, DC.
Manor, J. (1999). The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization: The World Bank.
Mathema, A. S., & Mawilmada, N. N. (2000). Decentralization and Housing Delivery: Lessons from The Case of San Fernando, La Union, Philippines. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Mello, L. d., & Barenstein, M. (2000). Fiscal Decentralization and Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations: A Cross-Country Analysis. World Development, 28(2), 365-380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00123-0
Metro Jambi. (2019, August 12). Serah Terima Aset Rusunawa di Tebo Masih Menunggu Persetujuan Presiden, Metro Jambi.Com. Retrieved from https://metrojambi.com/read/2019/08/13/46294/serah-terima-aset-rusunawa-di-tebo-masih-menunggu-persetujuan-presiden
Miller, M. A. (2013). Decentralizing I ndonesian City Spaces as New ‘Centers’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 834-848. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2013.01209.x
Mollah, M. A. H. (2007). Administrative Decentralization in Bangladesh: Theory and practice. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 10(1), 1-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-10-01-2007-B001
Murthy, S. L., & Mahin, M. J. (2015). Constitutional Impediments to Decentralization in the World's Largest Federal Country. Duke J. Comp. & Int'l L., 26, 79. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2589471
Nasution, A. (2017). The Government Decentralization Program in Indonesia Central and Local Government Relations in Asia: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. (2012). Qualitative Analysis Techniques for The Review of The Literature. Qualitative Report, 17, 56.
Prayitno, B., Kusumawanto, A., Kristiadi, D., & Suryanto, S. (2016). Skema Inovatif Pemenuhan Kesejahteraan Atas Papan. Jurnal Kawistara, 6(1), 47-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.15487
Radar Palembang. (2021, 15 October). Terbongkar! Penyebab Revitalisasi Rusun Mandek 6 Tahun, Radar Palembang.Com Retrieved from https://radarpalembang.sumeks.co/terbongkar-penyebab-revitalisasi-rusun-mandek-6-tahun/
Rodden, J. (2006). Hamilton's Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism (Vol. 2): Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
Roitman, S. (2016). Top-Down and Bottom-Up Strategies for Housing and Poverty Alleviation in Indonesia: The PNPM programme in Yogyakarta Dynamics and Resilience of Informal Areas (pp. 187-210): Springer.
Rondinelli, D. A., Nellis, J. R., & Cheema, G. S. (1983). Decentralization in Developing Countries. World Bank staff working paper, 581, 13-28.
Santoso, P. (2010). Satu Dekade, Separuh-Jalan Proses Desentralisasi. Jurnal Desentralisasi, 8(5), 1-12.
Schuk, C. (2009). Overcoming Challenges in Centralized and Decentralized Housing Models. Policy commons.
Shah, A. (1999). Balance, Accountability, and Responsiveness: Lessons About Decentralization. Available at SSRN 623937.
Shah, A., Thompson, T., & Zou, H.-F. (2004). Decentralising The Public Sector: The Impact of Decentralisation on Service Delivery, Corruption, Fiscal Management and Growth in Developing and Emerging Market Economies: A Synthesis of Empirical Evidence. CESifo DICE Report, 2(1), 10-14.
Sharma, C. K. (2006). Decentralization Dilemma : Measuring The Degree and Evaluating The Outcomes. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 67(1), 49-64.
Slater, D. (1990). Debating Decentralization—A Reply to Rondinelli. Development and change, 21(3), 501-512. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1990.tb00386.x
Sow, M., & Razafimahefa, M. I. F. (2015). Fiscal Decentralization and The Efficiency of Public Service Delivery: International Monetary Fund.
Steunenberg, B., & Mol, N. (1997). Comparative Analysis of Six West European Countries. Public Sector Reform: Rationale, Trends and Problems, 235.
Suara Publik News. (2018, 6 Agustus). DPRD Tanbu Sorot Pembangunan Rusunawa yang Mangkrak, Dinas Terkait Lepas Tangan, SuarapublikNews. Retrieved from https://suarapubliknews.net/dprd-tanbu-sorot-pembangunan-rusunawa-yang-mangkrak-dinas-terkait-lepas-tangan/
Sujarwoto, S. (2012). Political Decentralization and Local Public Services Performance in Indonesia. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 2(3), 55-84.
Talitha, T., Firman, T., & Hudalah, D. (2020). Welcoming Two Decades of Decentralization in Indonesia: A Regional Development Perspective. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(5), 690-708. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2019.1601595
Usman, S. (2003). Politik Lokal di Era Desentralisasi: Menuju Otonomi Rakyat. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/51147-EN-politik-lokal-di-era-desentralisasi-menuju-otonomi-rakyat.pdf
Vries, M. S. D. (2000). The Rise and Fall of Decentralization: A Comparative Analysis of Arguments and Practices in European Countries. European journal of political research, 38(2), 193-224. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00532
Woller, G. M., & Phillips, K. (1998). Fiscal Decentralisation and IDC Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation. The Journal of Development Studies, 34(4), 139-148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389808422532
Yuna, F., Yenny, S., Ucok Sky, K., Lukman, H., Eva, M., & Hadi, P. (2012). Kupas Tuntas Hubungan Keuangan Pusat Daerah. Jakarta: Sekretariat Nasional Forum Indonesia Untuk Transparasi Anggaran.
Zanetta, C. (2007). Seeking Better Policies or Just Giving Up Responsibility: The Decentralization of Argentina’s National Housing Fund. Global Urban Development Magazine, 3(1), 1-14.
Zhang, T., & Zou, H.-f. (1998). Fiscal Decentralization, Public Spending, and Economic Growth in China. Journal of Public Economics, 67(2), 221-240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00057-1
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Pengembangan Kota
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0