The Influence Of Organizational Factors on Compliance With The Standard Planning Process in Primary Health Care

Ayun Sriatmi; Sutopo Patria Jati; Eka Yunila Fatmasari

doi:10.14710/jphtcr.v3i1.7531

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jphtcr.v3i1.7531

The Influence Of Organizational Factors on Compliance With The Standard Planning Process in Primary Health Care

Ayun Sriatmi , Sutopo Patria Jati, Eka Yunila Fatmasari

Health Policy and Administration, Faculty of Public Health, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

Received: 8 Apr 2020; Published: 15 Apr 2020.

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{JPHTCR7531,
    author = {Ayun Sriatmi and Sutopo Patria Jati and Eka Yunila Fatmasari},
    title = {The Influence Of Organizational Factors on Compliance With The Standard Planning Process in Primary Health Care},
    journal = {Journal of Public Health for Tropical and Coastal Region},
  volume = {3},
    number = {1},
    year = {2020},
    keywords = {Planning of PHC;compliance of standards;organizational factors},
    abstract = {   Background  : Planning becomes the most important management function because it arranges all management activities. Non-compliance with the standards of the planning process has an impact on the quality of planning that is unable to bridge needs which ultimately lead to dissatisfaction. PHC as public organizations must meet public service standards. Organizational factors are determinants of organizational performance as they relate to the provision and arrangement of vaious resources  Aims  : The purpose of study was to determine affect of organizational factors on compliance with the standards of PHC planning process.    Methods  : An observational study with cross sectional design. All 56 PHC in the 2 districts in Central Java province (Semarang and Kudus) became the samples. The respondents are officer in charge of the PHC planning programme.. Data collection by interviews using questionnaires and observations. Data were analyzed descriptively and statistically.    Results  : Only 55.4% of PHCs comply with standard planning process. Weaknesses and inconsistencies still occur at every stage, especially with regard to inaccuracy of time, incomplete and inappropriate data, and low understanding of members of the team. Study shows that the aspect of manpower, infrastructure, organizing and monitoring-evaluation function are positively correlated with adherence to standard planning processes, where monitoring-evaluation factors are the dominant factor.   Conclusion  : All the gaps identified as the cause of puskesmas non-compliance to the standard planning process can be overcome through increasing staff commitment and competency by providing structured managerial training and routine socialization. Strengthening the monitoring-evaluation function needs to be pursued consistently to ensure the quality of the puskesmas planning process and the implementation of the work plan produced},
   issn = {2597-4378},   pages = {9--16}  doi = {10.14710/jphtcr.v3i1.7531},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jphtr/article/view/7531}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Background: Planning becomes the most important management function because it arranges all management activities. Non-compliance with the standards of the planning process has an impact on the quality of planning that is unable to bridge needs which ultimately lead to dissatisfaction. PHC as public organizations must meet public service standards. Organizational factors are determinants of organizational performance as they relate to the provision and arrangement of vaious resourcesAims: The purpose of study was to determine affect of organizational factors on compliance with the standards of PHC planning process.Methods: An observational study with cross sectional design. All 56 PHC in the 2 districts in Central Java province (Semarang and Kudus) became the samples. The respondents are officer in charge of the PHC planning programme.. Data collection by interviews using questionnaires and observations. Data were analyzed descriptively and statistically.Results: Only 55.4% of PHCs comply with standard planning process. Weaknesses and inconsistencies still occur at every stage, especially with regard to inaccuracy of time, incomplete and inappropriate data, and low understanding of members of the team. Study shows that the aspect of manpower, infrastructure, organizing and monitoring-evaluation function are positively correlated with adherence to standard planning processes, where monitoring-evaluation factors are the dominant factor.Conclusion: All the gaps identified as the cause of puskesmas non-compliance to the standard planning process can be overcome through increasing staff commitment and competency by providing structured managerial training and routine socialization. Strengthening the monitoring-evaluation function needs to be pursued consistently to ensure the quality of the puskesmas planning process and the implementation of the work plan produced

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: Planning of PHC;compliance of standards;organizational factors

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Journal of Public Health for Tropical and Coastal Region

Recent articles

The Influence Of Organizational Factors on Compliance With The Standard Planning Process in Primary Health Care Examining the Smoking Levels of Junior High School Students in Semarang City, Indonesia STRENGTHENING MATERNAL AND CHILD PROGRAM IN INDONESIA THROUGH INTEGRATED PLANNING AND BUDGETING More recent articles

Symond D. Penentuan Prioritas Masalah Kesehatan dan Prioritas Jenis Intervensi Kegiatan Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan Di Suatu Wilayah. J Kesehat Masy 2013; 7: 95–100
Mosadeghrad AM. Factors Influencing Healthcare Service Quality. Int J Heal Policy Manag 2014; 3: 77–89
Farzana N, Suparwati A, Arso SP. Analisis Kesiapan Akreditasi Dasar Puskesmas Mangkang Di Kota Semarang. J Kesehat Masy 2016; 4: 94–103
Maghfiroh L, Rochmah TN. Analisis Kesiapan Puskesmas Demangan Kota Madiun Dalam Menghadapi Akreditasi. Media Kesehat Masy Indones 2017; 13: 329–336
Prihandari H. Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Penilaian Kinerja Puskesmas di Kabupaten Jepara Tahun 2012. Universitas Diponegoro, 2014
Purnamasari W, Marhaeni D. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Perencanaan dan Penganggaran Kesehatan Bersumber APBD : Suatu Kajian Literatur. 2009; 1–8
Winardi. Asas-Asas Manajemen. Cet.2. Bandung.: CV Mandar Maju, 2000
Dhewi SB, Heldy B, Fauzi. Analisis Perencanaan Tingkat Puskesmas Di Kota Medan Tahun 2012. J Kebijakan, Promosi Kesehat dan Biostat FKM-USU 2013; 2: 1–7
Mebri II. Evaluasi Proses Perencanaan Tingkat Puskesmas di Lingkungan Dinas Kesehatan Kota Jayapura Provinsi Papua. Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 2009
Hasan AG, Adisasmito WBB. Analisis Kebijakan Pemanfaatan Dana Kapitasi JKN Pada FKTP Puskesmas Di Kabupaten Bogor Tahun 2016. Kebijak Kesehat Indones 2017; 06: 127–137
Meldayeni. Analisis Konsistensi Perencanaan dan Penganggaran Bidang Kesehatan di Kota Solok Tahun 2007-2010. Universitas Andalas. Padang., 2011
Gibson JL, Ivancevich JM, Jr JHD. Organisasi: Perilaku, Struktur, Proses. Edisi 5. J. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1987
Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CH. Measuring Factors Affecting Implementation of Health Innovations : a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient and innovation level measures. J Implement Sci 2013; 8: 1–20
Manojlovich M, Ketefian S. The Effects of Organizational Culture on Nursing Professionalism: Implication for Health Resources Planning. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research Archive 2002; 33: 15–34
Choudhary GB, Puranik S. A Study on Employee Performance Appraisal in Health Care. Asian J Manag Sci 2014; 02: 59–64
Harsasto P. Manajemen dan Pengukuran Kinerja Pemerintahan. Semarang, 2004
Shukla A, Khanna R, Jadhav N. Using community-based evidence for decentralized health planning : insights from Maharashtra , India. Health Policy Plan 2018; 33: e34–e45
Lawn S, Delany T, Sweet L, et al. Please cite this article as : Barriers and enablers to good communication and information-sharing practices in care planning for chronic condition management. Aust J Prim Heal 2013; 21: 84–89
Handayani L, Ma’ruf NA, Sopacua E. Peran Tenaga Kesehatan sebagai Pelaksana Pelayanan Kesehatan Puskesmas. Bul Penelit Sist Kesehat 2009; 13: 12–20
Santrić Milicevic MM, Bjegovic-Mikanovic VM, Terzic-Supić ZJ, et al. Competencies gap of management teams in primary health care. Eur J Public Health 2011; 21: 247–253
Almalki MJ, FitzGerald G, Clark M. The relationship between quality of work life and turnover intention of primary health care nurses in Saudi Arabia. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12: 314
Alhassan RK, Spieker N, van Ostenberg P, et al. Association between health worker motivation and healthcare quality efforts in Ghana. Hum Resour Health 2013; 11: 1–11
Malik AA, Yamamoto SS, Souares A, et al. Motivational determinants among physiciansin Lahore, Pakistan. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10: 201–211
Nawawi M. Pengaruh Motivasi dan Kompetensi Tenaga Kesehatan terhadap Kinerja Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat. Mimb J Sos dan Pembang 2012; XXVIII: 93–102
Frenk J, Moon S. Governance Challenges in Global Health. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 936–942
Tsofa B, Molyneux S, Gilson L, et al. How does decentralisation affect health sector planning and financial management ? a case study of early effects of devolution in Kilifi County , Kenya. Int J Equity Health 2017; 16: 1–12
Reynolds HW, Sutherland EG. A systematic approach to the planning , implementation , monitoring , and evaluation of integrated health services. BMC Heal Serv Res 2013; 13: 1–11

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Starting in 2021, the author(s) whose article is published in the JPHTCR journal attain the copyright for their article. By submitting the manuscript to JPHTCR, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.

The author(s) guarantee that their article is original, written by the mentioned author(s), has never been published before, does not contain statements that violate the law, does not violate the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is held exclusively by the author(s), and is free from the rights of third parties, and that the necessary written permission to quote from other sources has been obtained by the author(s).

The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:

Copyright and other proprietary rights related to articles, such as patents,
The right to use the substance of the article in its own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce articles for its own purposes,
The right to archive articles yourself (please read our deposit policy), and
The right to enter into separate additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of published versions of articles (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Journal of Public Health for Tropical and Coastal Region).
If the article was prepared jointly by more than one author, each author submitting the manuscript warrants that they have been given permission by all co-authors to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf, and agree to notify the co-authors of the terms of this policy. JPHTCR will not be held responsible for anything that may arise because of the writer's internal dispute. JPHTCR will only communicate with correspondence authors.

Authors should also understand that once published, their articles (and any additional files, including data sets, and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently featured on the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. JPHTCR allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and JPHTCR to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.