skip to main content

Evaluation of Hazard Communication Implementation in the “X” Limited Liability Company (LLC) based on OSHA Document Standard

Public Health Study Program, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Jember, Jember, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Received: 19 Jul 2024; Published: 30 Aug 2024.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 The authors. Published by Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Diponegoro
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Abstract

Introduction: Based on a report from the Ministry of Manpower, throughout 2021 there have been around 48,195 cases of occupational accidents and diseases in various industries. One worker factor affecting work accidents is the lack of OSH knowledge. Hazard communication is important in improving workers' expertise and safe behavior. “X” LLC is one of the high-risk industries where the application of hazard communication components, especially training at “X” LLC , is still very limited and has not fulfilled the training components in the OSHA standard. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of hazard communication at “X” LLC  with the guidance of OSHA documents.[SDL1] [SDL2] 

Methods: This research is evaluative. The unit of analysis in this research is the hazard communication facility implemented by “X” LLC  Includes information from HSE officers and workers. Observation results were compared with the implementation of hazard communication with OSHA documents.

Results: Based on the results of observations made, it was found that the suitability of the implementation of hazard communication implemented by “X” LLC  by OSHA documents of 65% (good) [SDL3] with a percentage of hazard classification suitability was 50% (sufficient), suitability of labeling was 71% (good), suitability of installation of signs and posters was 80% (very good), suitability of safety data sheets was 100%, suitability of socialization was 57% (good), and of implementation of training was 33% (sufficient). With these observations, it affects workers' understanding of hazards and hazard handling in their work area where workers' understanding of hazard communication comes more from experience and initial information due to limited forms of communication and training.

Conclusion: Evaluation of the implementation of hazard communication at “X” LLC  obtained a conformity percentage of 65% (good) with several components requiring improvement started from the arrangement of production materials according to health hazards, adding communication media and increasing the implementation of OHS training, especially training in chemical handling, risk control and first aid in work accidents.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: evaluation; hazard communication; OHS communication; OHS socialization

Article Metrics:

  1. Ubaidillah I, Ekawati, Wijasena B. Hubungan Pengetahuan dan Sikap Mengenai Informasi Peta Hazard dengan Praktik Pekerja dalam Mencegah Kecelakaan Kerja di Industri Manufaktur. J Kesehat Masy. 2021;9(1):38–43
  2. Kemenaker RI. Profil Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Nasional Indonesia Tahun 2022. 2022. 251 p
  3. Rahmadani DA. Teori Perilaku Karyawan. Pusdansi. 2022;2(4):1–8
  4. Fitriyani, Putri NW, Khairunisa M, Fiqran WA, Angela M, Marianda IB. Komunikasi Bahaya Dan Edukasi Budaya K3 Pada Pekerja Industri Mebel Kayu Di Kota Payakumbuh. Bul Ilm Nagari Membangun. 2023;6(2):132–41
  5. Ali RF, Fachrin SA, Alwi MK. Analisis Penerapan Komunikasi K3 Terhadap Kecelakaankerja Pada Pekerja Di Bagian Produksi Dan Pergudangan PT. Japfa Comfeed Tbk Unit Makassar. Wind Public Heal J. 2023;4(6):1007–14
  6. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Standar Komunikasi Bahaya OSHA dan Pedoman OSHA. CDC. 2022
  7. OSHA. 1910.1200 Hazard Communication Standard. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200. 2019
  8. OSHA. Hazard Communication: Small Entity Compliance Guide for Employers That Use Hazardous Chemicals. Osha 3695-03. 2014
  9. Mukti Mulyojati PA, Yuamita F. Analisis Potensi Bahaya Kerja Pada Proses Pencetakan Pengecoran Logam Menggunakan Metode Job Safety Analysis (JSA). J Teknol dan Manaj Ind Terap. 2023;2(2):90–7
  10. Wulandari Y. Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja di Industri Besi Baja PT. Krakatau Steel Cilegon. 2009. (Skripsi)
  11. Mangiwa GGR. Pelaksanaan Hazard Communication Bahan Kimia Pada Perusahaan Pengecatan Mobil di Kota Makassar. 2013
  12. Nur M. Analisis 5S Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Kecelakaan Kerja Pada Gudang Material Di “X” LLC YZ. J Tek Ind Terintegrasi. 2022;5(1):13–9
  13. Wahid A, Munir M, Hidayatulloh AR. Analisis Resiko Kecelakaan Kerja Menggunakan Metode HIRARC PT. SPI. J Ind View. 2020;2(2):45–52
  14. Ramadhani DAN. Penggunaan Job Safety Analysis dalam Menganalisis Potensi Bahaya pada Praktikum Kimia Organik sebagai Upaya Penerapan Keselamatan dan Keamanan Kerja Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia. 2022
  15. Herudiansyah G, Candera M, Pahlevi R. Penyuluhan Pentingnya Label Pada Kemasan Produk Dan Pajak Pada Usaha Kecil Menengah (UKM) Desa Tebedak II Kecamatan Payaraman Ogan Ilir. Suluh Abdi J Ilm Pengabdi Kpd Masy. 2019;1(2):84–9
  16. Indrayani R, Syamila AI, Permatasari ER, Katsiiroh AQ, Aulia MA, Nurvita AR. Upaya Pengendalian Administratif Bahaya Pelarut Organik (Organic Solvent) pada Industri Sektor Informal. ABDIMAYUDA Indones J Community Empower Heal. 2022;1(2):75
  17. Purnama R, Garmini R, Febiola A. Penggunaan APD Dan Kepatuhan Rambu Keselamatan Terhadap Keberhasilan Zero Accident Di PT Jatimulia Indonesia. Masker Med. 2023;11(1):203–8
  18. Amri A.K. Analisa Penerapan Promosi Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja Di PT. Wijaya Karya PPB Majalengka. J Kesehat Tambusai. 2023;4(3):3028–33
  19. Elyas AH, Iskandar E, Suardi. Inovasi Model Sosialisasi Peran Masyarakat Kecamatan Hamparan Perak dalam Pemilu. J War. 2020;14(1):137–49
  20. Priyatna BS, Latif I, Rahayu DH. Pengaruh Penerapan Safety Patrol terhadap Kepatuhan Pemakaian Alat Pelindung Diri (APD) di “X” LLC . Hosp MAJAPAHIT J Ilm Kesehat Sekol Tinggi Ilmu Kesehat Majapahit. 2024;16(1):76–83
  21. Kirom Ramadhani H, Sunaryo M, Trio Afandy BA, Cristyanto RM, Rhomadhoni MN. Sosialisasi Bahaya Bekerja di Tempat Panas Pada Pekerja di UD. Griya Berkah. J Pengabdi Kpd Masy Nusant. 2024;5(1):600–6
  22. Purba FMAV, Widjanarti MP, Haryati S. Pengaruh Video Edukasi terhadap Tingkat Pengetahuan tentang APAR pada Pekerja Stationery di “X” LLC Tangerang. J Kesehat Masy. 2023;11(3):341–9
  23. Tamsuri A. Literatur Review Penggunaan Metode Kirkpatrick untuk Evaluasi Pelatihan di Indonesia. J Inov Penelit. 2022;2(8):2723–34
  24. Hartayu R, Andriawan AH, Setyadjit K, Swarga LA, Ridho’i A, Hariadi HB. Pelatihan Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) Di Perusahaan Plywood CV. Wana Indo Raya Lumajang. J Pengabdi Masy. 2023;8(2):9–13
  25. Safitri DM, Azmi N, Utami IW, Putri LR, Yuniarti H, Hanifati AN. Pelatihan Pengendalian Risiko pada Keselamatan Kerja di Jasa Binatu. Abdimas Univers. 2023;5(2):211–7
  26. Tambipi FJ, Multazam A, Ikhtiar M. Penerapan Pertolongan Pertama Pada Kecelakaan (P3K) Kontruksi Kapal Di Kota Makassar. J Muslim Community Heal. 2020;1(2):97–106
  27. Prengky Pardede. Analisis Kecelakaan Kerja pada Saat Bongkar Muat Di Kapal Mt. Grace Harmony. 2020
  28. Ariyani R, Suarantalla R, Mashabai I. Analisa Potensi Kecelakaan Kerja Pada PT. PLN (Persero) Sumbawa Menggunakan Metode Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP). J Ind Teknol Samawa. 2021;2(1):11–21

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.